Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Jul 2015, 19:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

solely in that?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

solely in that? [#permalink] New post 20 Nov 2008, 05:34
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alone
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoided
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoided
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoided

I was wondering why "solely in" is not the correct answer :cry:
is it (E) however it looks like not strong enough? could someone clarify the weakness of each option, pleassssssse
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2008
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: solely in that? [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2008, 05:03
IMO A, what is wrong with it?
in E, 'if only because' doesn't sound good... is E OA?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 199
Schools: Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 3

Re: solely in that? [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2008, 07:50
jugolo1 wrote:
Building large new hospitals in the bistate area would constitute a wasteful use of resources, on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alone.
(A) on the basis of avoidance of duplicated facilities alonelooks redundant..on the basis of avoidance..is same as to avoid.. hold
(B) on the grounds of avoiding duplicated facilities alonehold
(C) solely in that duplicated facilities should be avoidedsolely in that... does not refer to anything specific.. awkward.. Out
(D) while the duplication of facilities should be avoidedwhile changes the meaning...
(E) if only because the duplication of facilities should be avoidedif only because... looks awkward construction..and if and because.. don't go together.

I was wondering why "solely in" is not the correct answer :cry:
is it (E) however it looks like not strong enough? could someone clarify the weakness of each option, pleassssssse


IMO its B.
Official Answer please.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 60
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: solely in that? [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2008, 07:53
B for me too
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1431
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 1

Re: solely in that? [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2008, 09:01
B is wrong because the idiom is grounds for. grounds of is incorrect.

It comes down to A & E.

This looks like a conditional statement if X then Y. I would take E over A for that reason and also because A has avoidance, which seems to be a noun. I feel that avoid should be used as a verb here and NOT as a noun.

Solely in that is wrong for the same reason as it does not fit the conditional clause. It would not be a waste of resources if duplication of facilities does not need to be avoided.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Posts: 77
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [1] , given: 0

Re: solely in that? [#permalink] New post 28 Nov 2008, 10:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
E for me as well.

I think 'Duplication of facilities' is the correct term here, duplicated facilities is incorrect
'Duplicated facilities should be avoided' refers to the facilities themselves
'Duplication of facilities should be avoided' refers to the act of duplication, which is what we want to avoid.
Re: solely in that?   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2008, 10:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

solely in that?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.