Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 350,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
19 Jun 2012, 02:34

8

This post received KUDOS

17

This post was BOOKMARKED

Solving Inequalities

I was going through the posts on inequalities and found that many good concepts are explained here, but still people do have trouble solving the question using these concept. In these posts, there were quadratic equations, curves, graphs and other mathematical stuff. With this post, I am trying to provide a simple method to solve such questions quickly. I won't be writing the concepts behind it. Remember this is the same OLD concept, it's just presented differently.

Case 1: Multiplication

for example: (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-7) \leq 0

To check the intervals in which this inequality holds true, we need to pick only one value from the number line. Lets say x = 10, then (9)(8)(7)(3) > 0, in every alternate interval the sign would be + for the above expression

Thus, inequality would hold true in the intervals: 1 \leq x \leq 2 3 \leq x \leq 7,

Note that intervals are inclusive of 3 & 7

Case 2: Division

In case of division: \frac{(x-1)(x-2)}{(x-3)(x-7)} \leq 0 Using the same approach as above; 1 \leq x \leq 2 3 < x < 7,(x\neq3,7)

Since (x-3)(x-7) is in denominator, its value can't be 0.

Following things to be kept in mind while using above method: 1. Cofficient of x should be positive: for ex - (x-a)(b-x)>0, can be written as (x-a)(x-b)<0 2. Even powers: for ex - (x-9)^2(x+3) \geq 0, (x-9)^2 is always greater than 0, so, it should be only considered to check the equality (=0) 3. Odd powers: (x-a)^3(x-b)^5>0, will be same as (x-a)(x-b)>0 4. Cancelling the common terms:

for ex - \frac {(x^2+x-6)(x-11)}{(x+3)} >0, it can be simplified as (x-2)(x-11)>0 or, ---(+)-----2---(-)-------------11----(+)------ thus x <2 or x>11, but since at x = -3 (in the original expression), we get undefined form, so, x

\neq -3

A question for you: For what values of x, does the following inequality holds true? (x-a)(x-b)...(x-n)...(x-z) \geq 0, where {a, b, c,...} are integers.

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
20 Jun 2012, 00:24

So that problem that you posted, let me give it a try:

A question for you: For what values of x, does the following inequality holds true? (x-a)(x-b)...(x-n)...(x-z) \geq 0, where {a, b, c,...} are integers.

Roots are: a,b,c,d...z The condition will hold true for these intervals: x\geq{z} x =x {x}\leq{x}\leq{y} {v}\leq{x\leq{w} {s}\leq{x\leq{t} {p}\leq{x\leq{t} {m}\leq{x\leq{n} {j}\leq{x\leq{k} {g}\leq{x\leq{h} {d}\leq{x\leq{e} {a}\leq{x\leq{b}

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
20 Jun 2012, 00:33

macjas wrote:

So that problem that you posted, let me give it a try:

A question for you: For what values of x, does the following inequality holds true? (x-a)(x-b)...(x-n)...(x-z) \geq 0, where {a, b, c,...} are integers.

Roots are: a,b,c,d...z The condition will hold true for these intervals: x\geq{z} x =x {x}\leq{x}\leq{y} {v}\leq{x\leq{w} {s}\leq{x\leq{t} {p}\leq{x\leq{t} {m}\leq{x\leq{n} {j}\leq{x\leq{k} {g}\leq{x\leq{h} {d}\leq{x\leq{e} {a}\leq{x\leq{b}

Is this correct??

Hi,

You have identified everything, but give a close tought again. The answer is pretty much straight forward.

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
20 Jun 2012, 00:48

cyberjadugar wrote:

macjas wrote:

So that problem that you posted, let me give it a try:

A question for you: For what values of x, does the following inequality holds true? (x-a)(x-b)...(x-n)...(x-z) \geq 0, where {a, b, c,...} are integers.

Roots are: a,b,c,d...z The condition will hold true for these intervals: x\geq{z} x =x {x}\leq{x}\leq{y} {v}\leq{x\leq{w} {s}\leq{x\leq{t} {p}\leq{x\leq{t} {m}\leq{x\leq{n} {j}\leq{x\leq{k} {g}\leq{x\leq{h} {d}\leq{x\leq{e} {a}\leq{x\leq{b}

Is this correct??

Hi,

You have identified everything, but give a close tought again. The answer is pretty much straight forward.

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
25 Jun 2012, 04:05

nice one - and a great link .. inequalities

kudos to cyberjadugar as well as gurpreet singh, veritas karishma...

is the answer to macjas quest is - 4 ( -2, -3, 3,4) -? kindly correct with explaination.

and to the solution to cyberjadugar - is it as follows? x<=a = +ve a>=x>=b = -ve b>=x>=n = +ve n>=x>=z = -ve x>=z = +ve

i may have done above wrong. pls do correct. and if the above is right , how the whole thing can be put together? like is it possible to write - z<=x<=a ot like z<=x<=a is +ve.

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
05 Nov 2012, 05:23

gpk wrote:

Edit: The 'x' before the inequality caused the confusion. I checked and that 'x' doe not exist.

What about '0' and '-4', '-5' '-6'...? 0<5, -4<5 ...

macjas wrote:

This one is a really useful trick cyberjadugar. Kudos to you and gurpreetsingh.

Example for practice from OG13 PS229:

How many of the integers that satisfy the inequality \frac{{(x+2)(x+3)}}{{x-2}}x\geq{0} are less than 5?

A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4 E 5

OldFritz wrote:

-3,-2,3,4

Therefore, there are 4 integers less than 5 that satisfy the inequality.

Cheers, Der alte Fritz.

Yes, the extra 'x' is a typo. Of course, none of the options match if that x was still present in the inequality. _________________

Kudos is the currency of appreciation.

You can have anything you want if you want it badly enough. You can be anything you want to be and do anything you set out to accomplish, if you hold to that desire with the singleness of purpose. ~William Adams

Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close to success they were when they gave up. ~Thomas A. Edison

Wir müssen wissen, Wir werden wissen. (We must know, we will know.) ~Hilbert

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
05 Nov 2012, 05:33

cyberjadugar wrote:

2. Even powers: for ex - (x-9)^2(x+3) \geq 0, (x-9)^2 is always greater than 0, so, it should be only considered to check the equality (=0) 3. Odd powers: (x-a)^3(x-b)^5>0, will be same as (x-a)(x-b)>0

Hello cyberjadugar,

Could you illustrate (2) and (3) with examples. Though (3) is kind of clear, I do not understand what exactly you mean in (2). _________________

Kudos is the currency of appreciation.

You can have anything you want if you want it badly enough. You can be anything you want to be and do anything you set out to accomplish, if you hold to that desire with the singleness of purpose. ~William Adams

Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close to success they were when they gave up. ~Thomas A. Edison

Wir müssen wissen, Wir werden wissen. (We must know, we will know.) ~Hilbert

2. Even powers: for ex - (x-9)^2(x+3) \geq 0, (x-9)^2 is always greater than 0, so, it should be only considered to check the equality (=0) 3. Odd powers: (x-a)^3(x-b)^5>0, will be same as (x-a)(x-b)>0

Hello cyberjadugar,

Could you illustrate (2) and (3) with examples. Though (3) is kind of clear, I do not understand what exactly you mean in (2).

Re: Solving Inequalities [#permalink]
15 May 2013, 22:55

shelrod007 wrote:

closed271 wrote:

cyberjadugar wrote:

2. Even powers: for ex - (x-9)^2(x+3) \geq 0, (x-9)^2 is always greater than 0, so, it should be only considered to check the equality (=0) 3. Odd powers: (x-a)^3(x-b)^5>0, will be same as (x-a)(x-b)>0

Hello cyberjadugar,

Could you illustrate (2) and (3) with examples. Though (3) is kind of clear, I do not understand what exactly you mean in (2).

Could some one please explain point 2 ??

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply.

For even powers, such as (x-9)^2, if you check for various values of x, for example, x = 1, (x-9)^2 = 64(>0) x=-1, (x-9)^2 = 100(>0) x =10, (x-9)^2=1(>0) but for x = 9, (x-9)^2=0 so, for every value of x, the even powers will always be greater or equal to 0, i.e. the sign of the expression doesn't change from positive to negative.

I was going through the posts on inequalities and found that many good concepts are explained here, but still people do have trouble solving the question using these concept. In these posts, there were quadratic equations, curves, graphs and other mathematical stuff. With this post, I am trying to provide a simple method to solve such questions quickly. I won't be writing the concepts behind it. Remember this is the same OLD concept, it's just presented differently.

Case 1: Multiplication

for example: (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-7) \leq 0

To check the intervals in which this inequality holds true, we need to pick only one value from the number line. Lets say x = 10, then (9)(8)(7)(3) > 0, in every alternate interval the sign would be + for the above expression

Thus, inequality would hold true in the intervals: 1 \leq x \leq 2 3 \leq x \leq 7,

Note that intervals are inclusive of 3 & 7

Case 2: Division

In case of division: \frac{(x-1)(x-2)}{(x-3)(x-7)} \leq 0 Using the same approach as above; 1 \leq x \leq 2 3 < x < 7,(x\neq3,7)

Since (x-3)(x-7) is in denominator, its value can't be 0.

Following things to be kept in mind while using above method: 1. Cofficient of x should be positive: for ex - (x-a)(b-x)>0, can be written as (x-a)(x-b)<0 2. Even powers: for ex - (x-9)^2(x+3) \geq 0, (x-9)^2 is always greater than 0, so, it should be only considered to check the equality (=0) 3. Odd powers: (x-a)^3(x-b)^5>0, will be same as (x-a)(x-b)>0 4. Cancelling the common terms:

for ex - \frac {(x^2+x-6)(x-11)}{(x+3)} >0, it can be simplified as (x-2)(x-11)>0 or, ---(+)-----2---(-)-------------11----(+)------ thus x <2 or x>11, but since at x = -3 (in the original expression), we get undefined form, so, x

\neq -3

A question for you: For what values of x, does the following inequality holds true? (x-a)(x-b)...(x-n)...(x-z) \geq 0, where {a, b, c,...} are integers.

PS: I hope you find this post useful, please provide feedback to improve the quality of the post.

Thanks,

Hi,

I have question with the below one,

[list]for ex - \frac {(x^2+x-6)(x-11)}{(x+3)} >0, it can be simplified as (x-2)(x-11)>0 or, ---(+)-----2---(-)-------------11----(+)------ thus x <2 or x>11, but since at x = -3 (in the original expression), we get undefined form, so, [m]x

using the plot of + ,- , how to identify x<2 or x>2 . I have a impression like if > is the used then it should be always x>2 & x>11 but the answer u have mentioned again confused me. Please help

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

I´ve done an interview at Accepted.com quite a while ago and if any of you are interested, here is the link . I´m through my preparation of my second...

It’s here. Internship season. The key is on searching and applying for the jobs that you feel confident working on, not doing something out of pressure. Rotman has...