|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 178
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 13
|
Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when [#permalink]
 05 Aug 2009, 17:41
Question Stats:
57% (01:42) correct
42% (00:51) wrong based on 1 sessions
Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim. (A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not (B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be (C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as (D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are (E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 305
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 6
|
C...uses "is", matches "a license"...and "as..., not as...." is parallel
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 375
Location: India
Followers: 16
Kudos [?]:
42
[0], given: 1
|
IMO C
correct verb is IS for singular subj. ownership
A & E have ambiguous it. So left out with C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 563
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
21
[0], given: 2
|
IMO E S-V argument and ||ism sher676 wrote: Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is -- when it is ||el
OA Please
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 168
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 8
|
I will go with C....
E also looks good but "a license granted by government and revokable at whim" refers to ownership and not to capitalism...
OA plz...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 270
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
26
[0], given: 23
|
Another forum confirms that the OA is C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 498
Schools: Fuqua
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
101
[0], given: 15
|
Here is my take.
Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
I tried reading the above sentence as follows -
The ownership is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual, not as a license granted by govt and revokable at whim.
Among the ans choices, only C is close enough. So my pick is C.
In E the problem is - The ownership is a license.......(how can a ownership be a license. It can be regarded as a license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 01 Apr 2010
Posts: 168
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 6
|
late response.. but C for me too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 179
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 33
|
C here also 
_________________
Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1570
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
121
[0], given: 6
|
good question. I fell for E.
good explanation by mrsmarthi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 694
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
50
[0], given: 15
|
Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND?
_________________
Consider kudos, they are good for health
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Preparing for the another shot...!
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1322
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 720 Q V
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 64
Kudos [?]:
312
[0], given: 52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
130
[0], given: 20
|
Agree with the last post. OWNERSHIP of (x and y) implies the subject of preposition is "ownership" and it is singular.
_________________
KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 13
GMAT Date: 01-10-2012
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 2
|
can someone explain why e is not correct.
I fell for e although after reading the posts c looks correct but important to understand the reason why e is not correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 592
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
130
[0], given: 20
|
akhil911 wrote: can someone explain why e is not correct.
I fell for e although after reading the posts c looks correct but important to understand the reason why e is not correct. Compare the two sentences: C: ownership is regarded as an individual's inalienable rights NOT as... a license... X: an individual's inalienable rights; Y: a license ownership is regarded as X not as Y: X and Y are nouns and parallel. E: ownership is regarded as the inalienable rights...ts NOT when it isX: the inalienable rights; Y: when it is a license (refers to a period) in this case, X and Y are not parallel: Hope that helps.
_________________
KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Struggling hard to maintain focus
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 122
Location: Kolkata
Schools: ISB, IIM
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 11
|
mainhoon wrote: Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND? Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
_________________
* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
** Every single second counts.
*** One KUDO earned is One step closer to GMAT. Help me in getting closer to GMAT.
**** i-invite-you-in-my-gmat-journey-121396.html.
Test Description_______Date____Total___Quant_____ Verbal
GMAT PREP1_____________________610
GMAX online test 1____29.07.2011__540_____43________19
MGMAT CAT 1_________03.09.2011__580____42________28
MGMAT CAT 2_________02.10.2011__690____48________36
GMAX online test 2_____16.10.2011__640____48________32
MGMAT CAT 3_________23.11.2011__670____47________34
Veritas free CAT______ 31.10.2011___630___ 46________33
MGMAT CAT 4_________06.11.2011__690____48________36
MGMAT CAT 5_________13.11.2011__660____46________34
MGMAT CAT 6_________19.11.2011__680____51________33
GMAT PREP2__________23.11.2011__680
GMAT Exam___________24.11.2011__690____50________34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 192
Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 25
|
mainhoon wrote: Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND? Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim. (A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not (B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be (C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as (D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are (E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is I am also confused between B and C! Reason - I chose 'are' initially because 2 things are joined using 'and', but C is the answer because 'ownership of both property and the means of production' made me think that there have to be 2 things after both - property and means! Hence our subject is ownership, which is singular! if we did not have 'both' there then we would have had 2 things - 'ownership of property and the means of production' followed by 'are'. I hope you got my point!
_________________
Working towards a goal...
V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1987
Location: India
Followers: 130
Kudos [?]:
667
[0], given: 170
|
Let us look at the structure of this sentence to ward any possible confusion in SV agreement, This complex-compound sentence has the following clauses 1 Some analysts contend --- main clause 2 that true capitalism exists only ----- Subordinate clause 1 3 When the ownership of both property and the means of production are regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s Subordinate clause 2. 4 and it is not a license granted by government and revocable at whim. – another independent clause Whether it is both property and the means of production or simply property and the means of production, it does not matter. The subject of the subordinate clause remains the ownership, a singular one. So the verb has to be necessarily the singular ‘is’. Therefor B is simply out. In addition, ‘regarded as’ is not // with the subjunctive verb ‘that it not be’. Use of the subjunctive imperative mood verb ‘that it not be’ will not go with the non-bossy verb ‘contend ‘
_________________
” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”
Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 314
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
Schools: Wharton '14 (D), CBS '14 (WL), Ross '14 (WL), Haas '14 (D), Johnson '14 (A), McCombs '14, Kenan-Flagler '14 (M), Madison (A), Consortium (D), Consortium (A), Consortium (M), Consortium, Consortium (A), Consortium (WL)
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
41
[0], given: 56
|
I picked C.....subject verb agreement "ownership...is" and parallelism "regarded as..., not as..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 212
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 11
|
mainhoon wrote: Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND? here the subject is "the Ownership"(singular) and not [of both property and the means of production] which is prepositions so we use IS and not ARE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
