Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Aug 2016, 18:37
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 68 [2] , given: 13

Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 17:41
2
This post received
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:59) correct 48% (00:58) wrong based on 1164 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.

(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 608 [4] , given: 20

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2011, 11:13
4
This post received
KUDOS
akhil911 wrote:
can someone explain why e is not correct.
I fell for e although after reading the posts c looks correct but important to understand the reason why e is not correct.


Compare the two sentences:

C: ownership is regarded as an individual's inalienable rights NOT as...a license...
X: an individual's inalienable rights; Y: a license
ownership is regarded as X not as Y: X and Y are nouns and parallel.

E: ownership is regarded as the inalienable rights...ts NOT when it is
X: the inalienable rights; Y: when it is a license (refers to a period)
in this case, X and Y are not parallel:

Hope that helps.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2012
Posts: 51
Location: United States
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 84 [3] , given: 26

Re: Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2012, 06:17
3
This post received
KUDOS
Questions that deal with subject-verb agreements can be tricky as the verb can be placed far away from the subject that refers to it.
Most questions that contain subject verb agreement errors contain many "smoke and mirrors" nouns. The intention of placing these nouns in the sentence is to deflect the attention of the reader from the REAL subject. For most questions, the good news is that the key to answer such questions is to understand that one CAN IGNORE subjects within prepositional phrases. I use the word "most" because sentences that contain SANAMO (Some, Any, None, Most, All, One) rely on the subject within the prepositional phrase to determine if the verb needs to be singular or plural.

Ok, now on to the question . I have reordered the answer choices for the purpose of explanation.


Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.



(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
Ok, so there are many nouns - Analysts, Capitalism, ownership, property, means of production, inalienable right etc etc
There are many verbs - contend, exists, "is", etc

"The noun "Analysts " matches with the verb "contend" - Plural
"The noun True capitalism" matches with the verb "exists" - Singular

Let's ignore the nouns within prepositional phrases. In this case, the prepositional phrase starts with "of". So let's chuck out the nouns property and means of production.
This leaves us with the noun "ownership" which is singular and hence the correct verb is "is" and not "are".
Lets read the sentence once again - Some analysts contend ...blah blah... exists only when the ownership of both blah.....blahon .....IS regarded as ...


(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
Ok, this one contains the right verb "is" . Lets examine the other aspects of this sentence.
Look at the usage - regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s. Seems like the sentence is missing a noun after the word "individual's".
E.g : The headlights of John's car failed to work.
The headlights of John's failed to work. - Doesn't make sense.

(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
OK in both the aspects.
Subject verb agreement.
Correct usage of 's - individual's inalienable right .
From a parallelism perspective - the usage of regarded as...not as is correct.


(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
Look at explanation for (B)

(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is

The subject - verb agreement is ok ,
The error with the 's is no longer present
However, there is a parallelism error here. The correct usage is "regarded as ...not as "..
The meaning of the sentence takes a turn for the worse.





IT TAKES A LOT OF EFFORT TO POST DETAILED RESPONSES.
YOUR KUDOS IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED.
IT DOESN'T COST A DIME TO GIVE A KUDOS.

_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IT TAKES QUITE A BIT OF TIME AND TO POST DETAILED RESPONSES.
YOUR KUDOS IS VERY MUCH APPRECIATED

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 491
Schools: Fuqua
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 245 [1] , given: 15

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2009, 21:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
Here is my take.

Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.

I tried reading the above sentence as follows -

The ownership is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual, not as a license granted by govt and revokable at whim.

Among the ans choices, only C is close enough. So my pick is C.

In E the problem is - The ownership is a license.......(how can a ownership be a license. It can be regarded as a license.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 9

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 17:45
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
C...uses "is", matches "a license"...and "as..., not as...." is parallel
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 372
Location: India
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 1

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2009, 23:32
IMO C

correct verb is IS for singular subj. ownership
A & E have ambiguous it. So left out with C.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 2

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2009, 21:33
IMO E

S-V argument and ||ism

sher676 wrote:
Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is -- when it is ||el


OA Please
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 163
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 8

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Aug 2009, 22:54
I will go with C....

E also looks good but "a license granted by government and revokable at whim" refers to ownership and not to capitalism...

OA plz...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 265
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 23

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2009, 09:51
Another forum confirms that the OA is C.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2010
Posts: 165
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 6

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2010, 22:02
late response.. but C for me too...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 33

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2010, 01:02
C here also :)
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...:)
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1558
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 492 [0], given: 6

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2010, 09:30
good question. I fell for E.

good explanation by mrsmarthi.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Posts: 690
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 15

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2010, 10:36
Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND?
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1420
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 170

Kudos [?]: 1169 [0], given: 62

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2011, 06:54
the subject is " the ownership of x and y"...and it's singular
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 591
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 608 [0], given: 20

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2011, 10:38
Agree with the last post.

OWNERSHIP of (x and y) implies the subject of preposition is "ownership"
and it is singular.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 196
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 886

Reviews Badge
Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Aug 2011, 10:45
can someone explain why e is not correct.
I fell for e although after reading the posts c looks correct but important to understand the reason why e is not correct.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Struggling hard to maintain focus
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 122
Location: Kolkata
Schools: ISB, IIM
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 11

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2011, 12:42
mainhoon wrote:
Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND?


Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as a license granted by government and revokable at whim.
_________________

* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
** Every single second counts.
*** One KUDO earned is One step closer to GMAT. Help me in getting closer to GMAT.
**** http://gmatclub.com/forum/i-invite-you-in-my-gmat-journey-121396.html.


Test Description_______Date____Total___Quant_____ Verbal
GMAT PREP1_____________________610
GMAX online test 1____29.07.2011__540_____43________19
MGMAT CAT 1_________03.09.2011__580____42________28
MGMAT CAT 2_________02.10.2011__690____48________36
GMAX online test 2_____16.10.2011__640____48________32
MGMAT CAT 3_________23.11.2011__670____47________34
Veritas free CAT______ 31.10.2011___630___ 46________33
MGMAT CAT 4_________06.11.2011__690____48________36
MGMAT CAT 5_________13.11.2011__660____46________34
MGMAT CAT 6_________19.11.2011__680____51________33
GMAT PREP2__________23.11.2011__680
GMAT Exam___________24.11.2011__690____50________34

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 189
Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 25

Reviews Badge
Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Sep 2011, 05:07
mainhoon wrote:
Why is it IS and not ARE? Can someone please clarify why the subject here is not plural - the 2 things joined by AND?


Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when the ownership of both property and the means of production is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not a license granted by government and revokable at whim.

(A) is regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s, and it is not
(B) are regarded as individuals’ inalienable rights, and that it not be
(C) is regarded as an individual’s inalienable right, not as
(D) are regarded as an individual’s inalienable rights, not when they are
(E) is regarded as the inalienable rights of an individual, not when it is

I am also confused between B and C!

Reason - I chose 'are' initially because 2 things are joined using 'and', but C is the answer because 'ownership of both property and the means of production' made me think that there have to be 2 things after both - property and means! Hence our subject is ownership, which is singular! if we did not have 'both' there then we would have had 2 things - 'ownership of property and the means of production' followed by 'are'.
I hope you got my point!
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 581

Kudos [?]: 4660 [0], given: 321

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Oct 2011, 02:31
Let us look at the structure of this sentence to ward any possible confusion in SV agreement,

This complex-compound sentence has the following clauses

1 Some analysts contend --- main clause
2 that true capitalism exists only ----- Subordinate clause 1
3 When the ownership of both property and the means of production are regarded as an inalienable right of an individual’s Subordinate clause 2.
4 and it is not a license granted by government and revocable at whim. – another independent clause


Whether it is both property and the means of production or simply property and the means of production, it does not matter. The subject of the subordinate clause remains the ownership, a singular one. So the verb has to be necessarily the singular ‘is’. Therefor B is simply out.

In addition, ‘regarded as’ is not // with the subjunctive verb ‘that it not be’. Use of the subjunctive imperative mood verb ‘that it not be’ will not go with the non-bossy verb ‘contend
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 311
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 56

Re: Capitalism [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2011, 16:45
I picked C.....subject verb agreement "ownership...is" and parallelism "regarded as..., not as..."
Re: Capitalism   [#permalink] 08 Oct 2011, 16:45

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 658). Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only Gmatter111 5 08 Dec 2009, 16:45
Some analysts of retirement problems insist that the only fall2009 1 30 Nov 2009, 21:48
2 Some Marxist scholars contend that the true revolution will bhatiagp 3 24 Jul 2008, 01:00
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Some analysts of retirement problems insist that the only walker 5 26 Feb 2008, 02:26
16 Some scientists contend that many species of dinosaur had a marcodonzelli 14 10 Feb 2008, 05:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some analysts contend that true capitalism exists only when

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.