Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 29 Aug 2014, 06:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 10:14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on the export of a strategic metal to country Zenda, if imposed, would drive up the price of the metal in Zenda at least tenfold. They note that few other countries export the metal and that, with an embargo, Zenda might have to depend on as-yet-unexploited domestic sources of the metal.
Which of the following, if true, constitutes the most serious objection to the analysis above?
(A) Litora’s economy depends heavily on foreign currency earned by the export of the strategic metal to other countries.
(B) There are foreign-policy steps that Zenda could take to appease Litora and avoid being subjected to an embargo on the metal.
(C) Geologists believe that additional deposits of the metal could possibly be found within the territory of Litora.
(D) Only a small proportion of Zenda’s import expenditures is devoted to the import of the metal from Litora.
(E) In case of an embargo, Zenda could buy the metal indirectly from Litora on the world market at a less than one-third increase in cost.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 12:11
E for me.
Embargo + other alternative + price increase is less than tenfold
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 13:44
Economist wrote:
E for me.
Embargo + other alternative + price increase is less than tenfold


i agree with that, but, what about b?it´s also an objection...isnt it?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 909
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 14:25
B says "Zenda could take to appease" which itself is weak in tone because there is no guarantee that Zenda will take such steps and also if it takes we dont know if Litora will be appeased.

Also B tries to KILL the argument itself by saying that embargo can be avoided. We have to play with facts and not completely kill the argument :)

What is the OA BTW?
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 228 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 15:37
Economist wrote:
B says "Zenda could take to appease" which itself is weak in tone because there is no guarantee that Zenda will take such steps and also if it takes we dont know if Litora will be appeased.

Also B tries to KILL the argument itself by saying that embargo can be avoided. We have to play with facts and not completely kill the argument :)

What is the OA BTW?


OA is E.

Thanks ofr your explanation, you are good man.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 220
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2009, 19:20
Noboru, here is one more reason why B cannot be the answer, or atleast why E is better than B. Read the argument carefully - "Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on the export of a strategic metal to country Zenda, if imposed, would"

Pay attention to the highlighted words - "if imposed". The argument talks about the embargo, if imposed. So the argument already takes into consideration, that there can be a situation in which the embargo may not be imposed. B gives one situation in which the embargo can be avoided. But we are asked find out, what weakens the arguments, if the embargo is imposed. Thats why E is better, because it explains that even if the embargo is imposed,Country Z could buy metal on world market for a cheaper price (hence the ten fold increase that is mentioned in the argument could be reduced to some extent).
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 359
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: Litora and Zenda [#permalink] New post 25 Aug 2009, 01:28
sdrandom1 wrote:
Noboru, here is one more reason why B cannot be the answer, or atleast why E is better than B. Read the argument carefully - "Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on the export of a strategic metal to country Zenda, if imposed, would"

Pay attention to the highlighted words - "if imposed". The argument talks about the embargo, if imposed. So the argument already takes into consideration, that there can be a situation in which the embargo may not be imposed. B gives one situation in which the embargo can be avoided. But we are asked find out, what weakens the arguments, if the embargo is imposed. Thats why E is better, because it explains that even if the embargo is imposed,Country Z could buy metal on world market for a cheaper price (hence the ten fold increase that is mentioned in the argument could be reduced to some extent).


good catch!
Re: Litora and Zenda   [#permalink] 25 Aug 2009, 01:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on vshaunak@gmail.com 4 03 May 2007, 01:53
Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on Riuscita 4 03 Apr 2006, 21:08
Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on nakib77 6 15 Oct 2005, 04:48
For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, sgrover 7 02 Oct 2005, 21:12
8 For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed, WinWinMBA 12 02 May 2005, 14:24
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some analysts maintain that an embargo by country Litora on

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.