Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Jul 2014, 20:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 10:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (02:02) correct 38% (01:43) wrong based on 58 sessions
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey parrots, seem to exhibit cognitive functions typically associated with higher-order primates such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Some parrots, for example, have vocabularies of hundreds of words that they can string together in a comprehensible syntax. This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate. One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

A. Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
B. Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
C. Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense sadness.
D. Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
E. Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.

is it C?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html


Last edited by ankurgupta03 on 27 Feb 2014, 02:32, edited 1 time in total.
added the OA
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 246

Kudos [?]: 628 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 14:00
E will certainly strengthen the conclusion. The stem tells us that Alex becomes aggressive if a requested gesture is not proffered. Taken on its own, this is evidence of nothing - maybe Alex always becomes aggressive after requesting a gesture, regardless of whether it's offered or not. From Alex's aggression alone, we don't know whether Alex truly understands the meaning of his communication; Alex might have no more understanding of language than an mp3 player (an aggressive one!). If E could be proven, that would provide evidence that Alex understands the meaning of his communication, and can associate his communication with the response it receives.

Answers A, C and D have a much more tenuous relationship with the conclusion of the passage, which is about learning language, and not about learning other tasks, and D is especially irrelevant because chimpanzees are specifically excluded from the group of animals the author is discussing. Answer B only confirms what the passage tells us: gorillas are capable of using some form of language.

_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 372
Location: PDX
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 24

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 14:04
The conclusion says that all animals such as dogs, parrots are capable of using language for communication.

A.Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues. - Can be taught - does not explicitly say anything about dolphins communicating back.
B.Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water. - Gorillas are primates, as per the argument.
C.Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense
sadness. Perfect.
D.Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food. Again, primates.
E.Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested. This is implicit in the argument.

_________________

In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 372
Location: PDX
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 24

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 14:18
IanStewart wrote:
E will certainly strengthen the conclusion. The stem tells us that Alex becomes aggressive if a requested gesture is not proffered. Taken on its own, this is evidence of nothing - maybe Alex always becomes aggressive after requesting a gesture, regardless of whether it's offered or not. From Alex's aggression alone, we don't know whether Alex truly understands the meaning of his communication; Alex might have no more understanding of language than an mp3 player (an aggressive one!). If E could be proven, that would provide evidence that Alex understands the meaning of his communication, and can associate his communication with the response it receives.

Answers A, C and D have a much more tenuous relationship with the conclusion of the passage, which is about learning language, and not about learning other tasks, and D is especially irrelevant because chimpanzees are specifically excluded from the group of animals the author is discussing. Answer B only confirms what the passage tells us: gorillas are capable of using some form of language.


Can you please elaborate on this Ian:

The stem states that Alex requests a specific gesture and gets annoyed if that specific gesture is not offered. Based on this how can you decipher that Alex does not truly understand the meaning of his communication ? If Alex were to uniformly express aggression for any kind of response - wouldn't that be mentioned in the argument ?

- pradeep

_________________

In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead

1 KUDOS received
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 246

Kudos [?]: 628 [1] , given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 15:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
pbanavara wrote:
Can you please elaborate on this Ian:

The stem states that Alex requests a specific gesture and gets annoyed if that specific gesture is not offered. Based on this how can you decipher that Alex does not truly understand the meaning of his communication ? If Alex were to uniformly express aggression for any kind of response - wouldn't that be mentioned in the argument ?


If the argument needs to be strengthened, which is what the question asks us to do, then certainly something hasn't been mentioned in the argument. Here, what hasn't been mentioned is how Alex behaves when he does receive what he asks for. We have no information about that (without using answer choice E), and in GMAT CR questions, you certainly can't make assumptions about anything not mentioned in the passage.

_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 372
Location: PDX
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 24

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 17:17
IanStewart wrote:
pbanavara wrote:
Can you please elaborate on this Ian:

The stem states that Alex requests a specific gesture and gets annoyed if that specific gesture is not offered. Based on this how can you decipher that Alex does not truly understand the meaning of his communication ? If Alex were to uniformly express aggression for any kind of response - wouldn't that be mentioned in the argument ?


If the argument needs to be strengthened, which is what the question asks us to do, then certainly something hasn't been mentioned in the argument. Here, what hasn't been mentioned is how Alex behaves when he does receive what he asks for. We have no information about that (without using answer choice E), and in GMAT CR questions, you certainly can't make assumptions about anything not mentioned in the passage.


Thanks Ian, much appreciated.

_________________

In the land of the night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 652
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 19:23
nitya34 wrote:
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey parrots, seem to exhibit cognitive functions typically associated with higher-order primates such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Some parrots, for example, have vocabularies of hundreds of words that they can string together in a comprehensible syntax. This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate. One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

A.Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
B.Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
C.Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense
sadness.
D.Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
E.Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.

is it C?


I also think of E. I did POE to find the answer: B and D are out because chimpanzees & gorillas are considered higher-order primates. Dogs are capable of doing something but that is not characterisitc of higher-order primates, so C is out. Dolphins are trained so NO "cognitive functions" - A is out.

_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 11 Mar 2009, 20:55
OA-E
I eliminated the Choices related to Primates and then picked up wrong one

_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 00:09
Though im late but E definitely
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 432
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 17 Mar 2009, 08:06
Nitya,

What is the source of the question?

I find one problem in E - It is a mistaken negation of the last sentence of the argument. Ideally the correct answer should be the contra positive of the original argument

or is it that I'm missing something?

Cheers,
Unplugged
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 18 Mar 2009, 08:07
Good one fell for C. But as Ian said E is the one that is perfect.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 138 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2009, 01:46
The conclusion is about "using language in communication by some animals". Then, the last sentence provides example of that communication.

E, correctly, validates that example.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 01:52
nitya34 wrote:
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey parrots, seem to exhibit cognitive functions typically associated with higher-order primates such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Some parrots, for example, have vocabularies of hundreds of words that they can string together in a comprehensible syntax. This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate. One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

A.Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
B.Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
C.Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense
sadness.
D.Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
E.Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.

is it C?

We must identify the conclusion first :" humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate". So other option except E are out because mention nothing of the capability of using language
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 11:54
good one. only E supports the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Posts: 96
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 42

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2013, 01:26
nitya34 wrote:
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey parrots, seem to exhibit cognitive functions typically associated with higher-order primates such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Some parrots, for example, have vocabularies of hundreds of words that they can string together in a comprehensible syntax. This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate. One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

A.Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
B.Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
C.Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense
sadness.
D.Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
E.Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.

is it C?


B,D out - talk about primates.
A - no communication thing mentioned.

I see showing care as a kind of a communication .. I marked C. E is correct but C is better. E just tells a little more about an example cited in argument ...

_________________

Forget Kudos ... be an altruist

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1932
Followers: 465

Kudos [?]: 1836 [1] , given: 29

Re: Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey [#permalink] New post 28 Oct 2013, 10:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
nitya34 wrote:
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey parrots, seem to exhibit cognitive functions typically associated with higher-order primates such as chimpanzees, gorillas, and humans. Some parrots, for example, have vocabularies of hundreds of words that they can string together in a comprehensible syntax. This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate. One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

A. Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
B. Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
C. Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense sadness.
D. Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
E. Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.

SaraLotfy wrote:
Hello Mike, Would you please take a look at this question: it's becoming rather controversial. Thanks

I don't know the source, but my understanding is that the OA is (E).

The argument takes for granted that higher-order primates (chimpanzees, gorillas, and human) have higher cognitive function, including language. The argument asserts that many other animals, including parrots and possibly dogs & dolphins, also have the ability to use language to communicate. That phrase is key to understanding this question.

First of all, choices (B) & (D) add further examples of higher-order primates doing sophisticated thinking. No matter how sophisticated the thinking of higher-order primates, this tells us zilch about whether animals outside of the higher-order primates have any sophisticated abilities. These are irrelevant.

Choice (A) is deceptive. As you may know from outside sources, dolphins are pretty clever. If this had been an example of dolphins doing something very sophisticated, then that could be a strengthener. As it happens, many many animals (even insects!!) can be trained to do things. It's not at all clear whether being trained to assist in ocean rescues would involve very sophisticated skills or tremendously easy things to do (e.g. tow someone or something to the surface). Because the nature of this activity is not clear, we cannot say this is a clear strengthener, so it cannot be correct.

Choice (C) is about emotions. The abilities to feel emotions and to sense emotions in others are not cognitive abilities at all. Yes, the ability to talk about emotions, or write poetry evoking emotions, or something such as that --- those involve cognitive skills, but simply feeling emotions or sensing emotions is not cognitive at all. That's why (C) is irrelevant.

This only leave (E). Think if this were false. If the parrot Alex were always aggressive, then the aggression would have nothing to do with what he said in words, and this would destroy the only solid piece of evidence in the argument. The only way Alex's aggression to an unrequested gesture would make sense as a piece of evidence would be if he show no aggression to a requested gesture. Therefore, (E) is a clear strengthener --- it reinforces one assumption of the argument.

Overall, this is a good question, although it may demand an awfully sophisticated understanding of either psychology or cognitive science --- a little more background than the GMAT would typically expect.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 26

Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2014, 07:56
IanStewart wrote:
E will certainly strengthen the conclusion. The stem tells us that Alex becomes aggressive if a requested gesture is not proffered. Taken on its own, this is evidence of nothing - maybe Alex always becomes aggressive after requesting a gesture, regardless of whether it's offered or not. From Alex's aggression alone, we don't know whether Alex truly understands the meaning of his communication; Alex might have no more understanding of language than an mp3 player (an aggressive one!). If E could be proven, that would provide evidence that Alex understands the meaning of his communication, and can associate his communication with the response it receives.

Answers A, C and D have a much more tenuous relationship with the conclusion of the passage, which is about learning language, and not about learning other tasks, and D is especially irrelevant because chimpanzees are specifically excluded from the group of animals the author is discussing. Answer B only confirms what the passage tells us: gorillas are capable of using some form of language.


Hi Sir

I have a doubt here.....how does agression related to the conclusion which says that "This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate "....agression no where deals with the conclusion...so its difficult for me to relate with E...Please help
Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 1932
Followers: 465

Kudos [?]: 1836 [0], given: 29

Re: CR-Primates and Humans [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2014, 10:36
Expert's post
AnmolKukreja wrote:
Hi Sir

I have a doubt here.....how does agression related to the conclusion which says that "This clearly shows that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate "....agression no where deals with the conclusion...so its difficult for me to relate with E...Please help

Dear AnmolKukreja,
I'll add my two cents here. :-)

Context is everything in GMAT CR & RC. It's perfectly true that aggression or the lack of it, by itself, tells us zilch about language. Animals that have absolutely no connection with language, such as lizards and squid, still can be aggressive. What matters here, and what always matters, is the context. Here's the relevant sentence.

One parrot, named Alex, has been known to ask to be petted or kissed and will exhibit aggression if the gesture offered is not the specific one requested.

So, the parrot uses language to make a request, and then, if that specific request, the request specified in the parrot's spoken language, is not given, then the parrot becomes aggressive. Well, the cynic could object, maybe the parrot is aggressive all the time. That's why (E) is such a powerful strengthener. If the parrot speaks a request, with language, and gets exactly what he asked for, then he is not aggressive. He is only aggressive when what he asked for, in language, doesn't match what he receives. This demonstrates that he understands language, because in order to respond in this differentiated way, he would have to understand the content of what he requested verbally.

Does this make sense?
Mike :-)

_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2013
Posts: 173
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [1] , given: 56

Re: Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey [#permalink] New post 27 Feb 2014, 02:17
1
This post received
KUDOS
Straight E for me.

Conclusion: ...that humans and primates are not the only animals capable of using language to communicate.

A. Dolphins can be trained to assist divers in ocean rescues.
Dolphins can be trained alright, but there is no mention of their ability to use language, remember we MAY have outside knowledge that dolphins do communicate using some sort of language in training, but this info we cannot bring in to this CR... hence not enough to strengthen the argument by itself.
B. Gorillas in captivity often learn hand signals for food and water.
Gorillas are primates, and we are not interested in humans and primates - incorrect
C. Dogs are capable of sensing their owners' moods and often exhibit concern if they sense sadness.
There is no language involved in this answer, plus to strengthen the above argument, something has to link dogs made some sort of language communication which is missing here, hence incorrect.
D. Chimpanzees can memorize long sequences of key punches on machines that dispense food.
Same as B, chimps are primates hence this answer is irrelevant.
E. Alex does not exhibit aggression when offered a gesture that he specifically requested.
This completes the info given in the question stem and proves that Alex indeed communicated using language first and further reacted with no aggression when given what it needed. Hence correct

_________________

Click on Kudos if you liked the post!

Practice makes Perfect.

Re: Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey   [#permalink] 27 Feb 2014, 02:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Animals that were originally feral, such as dogs, horses, goodyear2013 1 07 Apr 2014, 05:29
Experts publish their posts in the topic HELP!!! = Since all dogs are animals, and cats are animals, omraan 4 19 Oct 2013, 00:42
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic Animals which were originally feral, such as dogs, horses, gmatpapa 18 05 May 2011, 03:56
8 Experts publish their posts in the topic Of 100 dogs at an animal shelter, some are doxin and the rxs0005 9 10 Nov 2010, 03:47
Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey Juaz 14 16 Apr 2007, 23:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some animals, such as dolphins, dogs, and African grey

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.