Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 16:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2769
Location: New York City
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 4

Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2007, 11:46
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:13) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
977. Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(A) scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(B) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be required of scholars
(C) require that scholars are to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(D) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be a scholarly requirement
(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy

Please explain why an asnwer is wrong.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 104
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2007, 11:55
E for parallelism.

C is gud for paralalelism but not concise and unidiomatic.

others are bad with parallelsim.

~sara
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 329
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: SC1000 #977 tablets [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2007, 12:04
Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy

...that the tablets found at Ebla could force..., alter..., make..., and (+verb).. (E) best answer, (C) is wordy! idiom is credit with! cheers
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 7

Re: SC1000 #977 tablets [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2007, 12:05
bmwhype2 wrote:
977. Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(A) scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ---> not || - should start with verb, doesn't make sense at all - could force...., alter.....,make....., and scholars...?
(B) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be required of scholars ---> not || - should start with "require" , doesn't make sense either
(C) require that scholars are to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ---> not ||, 1st 6 words are akward construction
(D) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be a scholarly requirement ---> not || - should start with "require" , doesn't make sense either
(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ----> Correct - is ||, idiomatic

Please explain why an asnwer is wrong.


How I dream to finish 1000SC ....I envy you :)
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2769
Location: New York City
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 4

Re: SC1000 #977 tablets [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2007, 22:36
botirvoy wrote:
bmwhype2 wrote:
977. Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(A) scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ---> not || - should start with verb, doesn't make sense at all - could force...., alter.....,make....., and scholars...?
(B) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be required of scholars ---> not || - should start with "require" , doesn't make sense either
(C) require that scholars are to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ---> not ||, 1st 6 words are akward construction
(D) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be a scholarly requirement ---> not || - should start with "require" , doesn't make sense either
(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy ----> Correct - is ||, idiomatic

Please explain why an asnwer is wrong.


How I dream to finish 1000SC ....I envy you :)


I did cursory preparation of SC1000. I'm doing this for the second time, learning all the concepts inside out, posting the questions on GMATClub that were not previously posted.


OA is E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 34
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2007, 01:38
I read in one of the Manhattan Review guides that command verbs like require need "that" after them.

So I choose C or E.

Any thoughts?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Jun 2007
Posts: 297
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2007, 08:23
tgalligan wrote:
I read in one of the Manhattan Review guides that command verbs like require need "that" after them.

So I choose C or E.

Any thoughts?


Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.


What if and wasn't there. Would option A still be wrong?
I mean, why not we can treat and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.
this as a seperate clause without complying to the requirements of parallelism?
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

Re: SC1000 #977 tablets [#permalink] New post 18 Sep 2007, 21:21
bmwhype2 wrote:
977. Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(A) scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(B) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be required of scholars
(C) require that scholars are to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(D) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be a scholarly requirement
(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy

Please explain why an asnwer is wrong.


I say E.

Follow ||ism: could "force", alter, make, and scholars?/crediting? No

require? yes.

Now btwn C and E. since that is not used in the original "could force" I dont see why we should use it here. are to is unnessicary "to credit" is just fine and less wordy.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 767
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Re: SC1000 #977 tablets [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2007, 08:32
bmwhype2 wrote:
977. Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla could force a revision of current theories on the origins of Judaism and Christianity, alter many scriptural interpretations, make all current Bible translations obsolete, and scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy.

(A) scholars may be required to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(B) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be required of scholars
(C) require that scholars are to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy
(D) crediting the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy may be a scholarly requirement
(E) require scholars to credit the Old Testament with greater historical accuracy

Please explain why an asnwer is wrong.


I pick E straight off the bat. '....could force, alter, make and require...'
Parallelism is maintained by E
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 767
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Sep 2007, 08:34
tgalligan wrote:
I read in one of the Manhattan Review guides that command verbs like require need "that" after them.

So I choose C or E.

Any thoughts?


I would say that don't make that a rule of thumb; it depends on the context of the rest of the sentence. In this case, we are not using 'require' as a command verb, we are simply stating a requirement :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2007
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Oct 2007, 05:09
E looks alright, but I am not sure how we can remove the uncertainty part mentioned in the original sentence "scholars may be required"....

Any thoughts!!!!
  [#permalink] 01 Oct 2007, 05:09
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Some psychologists claim that iyersu 2 04 Jan 2014, 01:51
4 Archaeologists have recently found in various grave sites in veenu08 16 16 Jun 2013, 00:24
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious durgesh79 0 27 Jun 2008, 12:53
Archaeologists have found wheeled ceramic toys made by the apache 4 07 May 2007, 20:02
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious u2lover 0 19 Jul 2006, 07:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some archaeologists claim that the tablets found at Ebla

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.