Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 14:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some companies in fields where skilled employees are hard to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3573
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 367

Kudos [?]: 1853 [1] , given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Some companies in fields where skilled employees are hard to [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2008, 11:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (06:14) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions
Some companies in fields where skilled employees are hard to find make signing an agreement not to compete a condition of employment. In such an agreement the employee promises not to go work for a competing firm for a set period after leaving his or her current employer. Courts are increasingly ruling that these agreements are not binding. Yet paradoxically, for people who signed such agreements when working for competing firms, many firms are unwilling to consider hiring them during the period covered by the agreement.

Which one of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?

(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favorable outcome.
(B) In some industries, for example the broadcast media, companies main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms.
(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding.
(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm.
(E) Many companied consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets.

Please, explain
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 709
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: an agreement not to compete [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2008, 12:06
is it A? the paradox is though courts are ruling in favor of employees, the companies are not willing to hire them

I see only A supporting it. Rest of them seem to be noise or not apt.
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: an agreement not to compete [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2008, 17:05
Conclusion: Many firms are unwilling to hire prospective candidates who signed the non competing agreement.
The answer choice that supports this is to do with why emploeer is not hiring candidates with non-competing agreement signed.


(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favorable outcome. [Hold it – This choice makes it clear why the employer is unwilling to hire]

(B) In some industries, for example the broadcast media, companies main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms. [This weakens the conclusion – eliminate it]

(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding. [Fine – but this doesn’t address paradox – eliminate it]

(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm. [What individuals are doing is irrelevant – we have to see why employer is not hiring – eliminate it]

(E) Many companied consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets. [What many companies want is out of scope – eliminate it]

Answer: A
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 315
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 48 [1] , given: 1

Re: CR: an agreement not to compete [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2008, 18:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
A for me, because it helps to explain that paradox by stating that Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even thouch they expect to have a favourable outcome.

The other options don't help to explain the paradox in anyway.
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3573
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 367

Kudos [?]: 1853 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR: an agreement not to compete [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2008, 20:17
Expert's post
Thanks!
OA is A
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 106
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: an agreement not to compete [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2008, 08:52
A
thanks
Re: CR: an agreement not to compete   [#permalink] 26 Mar 2008, 08:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y Maksym 1 05 Aug 2014, 07:16
2 An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y Maksym 4 05 Aug 2014, 07:16
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic In a company with 48 employees, some part-time and some full alex1233 9 12 May 2012, 05:26
At a certain company, some of the employees have advanced adarsh12345 3 02 Nov 2009, 03:06
Company A has a total of n employees, where n is an odd haichao 1 17 Nov 2008, 14:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some companies in fields where skilled employees are hard to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.