Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 07:55

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2004, 17:06
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (02:49) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions
11. Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great works of art are housed in huge metropolitan museums, since the populations served by these museums already have access to a wide variety of important artwork. But this criticism is in principle unwarranted because the limited number of masterpieces makes wider distribution of them impractical. Besides, if a masterpiece is to be fully appreciated, it must be seen alongside other works that provide a social and historical context for it.

Which one of the following, if established, could most logically serve as the principle appealed to in the argument countering the critics┬б┬п claim?

(A) In providing facilities to the public, the goal should be to ensure that as many as possible of those people who could benefit from the facilities are able to do so.

(B) In providing facilities to the public, the goal should be to ensure that the greatest possible number of people gain the greatest benefit possible from them.

(C) It is unreasonable to enforce a redistribution of social goods that involves depriving some members of society of these goods in order to supply others

(D) For it to be reasonable to criticize an arrangement as unfair, there must be a more equitable arrangement that is practically attainable.

(E) A work of art should be displayed in conditions resembling as closely as possible those in which the work was originally intended to be displayed.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2004, 21:43
Answer is D.
I doubt ths answer. I chose E. If D were corect then counter argument is also questionable because it does not provide any other alternative either. How do we know the critics dont have any practical means to achieve what they are proposing.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 265
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2004, 22:40
I think answer should be C.
E : how do u know that those artifacts are intended to be displayed in a museum?

C: it striks the prmises given in the argument.

thoughts?
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2004, 23:36
We are asked to find a principle that goes against the critics of the proposal. As per C if the artifacts are destributed to people how does it deprive some other members. I think C neither weakens or strengthens the postion taken by the critics.
GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 771
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Art works [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2004, 23:49
anandnk wrote:
11. Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great works of art are housed in huge metropolitan museums, since the populations served by these museums already have access to a wide variety of important artwork. But this criticism is in principle unwarranted because the limited number of masterpieces makes wider distribution of them impractical. Besides, if a masterpiece is to be fully appreciated, it must be seen alongside other works that provide a social and historical context for it.

Which one of the following, if established, could most logically serve as the principle appealed to in the argument countering the critics┬б┬п claim?

(A) In providing facilities to the public, the goal should be to ensure that as many as possible of those people who could benefit from the facilities are able to do so.

(B) In providing facilities to the public, the goal should be to ensure that the greatest possible number of people gain the greatest benefit possible from them.

(C) It is unreasonable to enforce a redistribution of social goods that involves depriving some members of society of these goods in order to supply others

(D) For it to be reasonable to criticize an arrangement as unfair, there must be a more equitable arrangement that is practically attainable.

(E) A work of art should be displayed in conditions resembling as closely as possible those in which the work was originally intended to be displayed.


I believe it is D. The counter-critics claim that since there are a limited number of masterpieces, a more equitable distribution is impractical hence it is unreasonable to criticize the status quo.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2012
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great [#permalink] New post 12 Jul 2012, 16:45
Answer: D

Author states, "But this criticism is in principle unwarranted because the limited number of masterpieces makes wider distribution of them impractical." Conclusion.

Question reads: "Which one of the following, if established, could most logically serve as the principle appealed to the argument countering the critics' claim?"

Answer D states: "For it to be reasonable to criticize an arrangement as unfair, there must be a more equitable arrangement that is practically attainable."

The answer is saying the same thing as the conclusion; you shouldn't do this because it's not practical, is in principle, the same thing as saying that "this criticism is in principle unwarranted because the limited number of masterpieces makes wider distribution of them impractical."
Re: Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great   [#permalink] 12 Jul 2012, 16:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests d vards 0 02 Jul 2014, 01:21
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Many critics claim that federally mandated car safety sajini 4 17 Sep 2012, 04:12
3 Although many claim, rightfully so, that selfish interests shrive555 11 03 Oct 2010, 13:42
Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great vineetgupta 5 23 Mar 2007, 09:47
Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great WinWinMBA 7 06 Jun 2005, 11:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some critics claim that it is unfair that so many great

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.