Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2014, 08:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 101 [1] , given: 18

GMAT Tests User
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2012, 19:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (02:08) correct 18% (01:24) wrong based on 56 sessions
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

(A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
(B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
(C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
(D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
(E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before


I correctly picked OA as an answer, but I chose it because others didn't make sense.
Can anyone explain the logic that shows why OA is correct ?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 291
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2012, 21:16
A is the best answer possible .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: May The Force Be With Me (D-DAY 15 May 2012)
Joined: 06 Jan 2012
Posts: 292
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 16

Reviews Badge
Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 31 Jan 2012, 21:27
(A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
= >
oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled

=> Oil needs to be recovered from these areas, hence A is correct

(B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
=> It is stated in the prompt that consumption will increase rapidly but the oil can sustain this growth in consumption

(C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
= > Irrelevant, though I almost selected this answer

(D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
=> Irrelevant Information

(E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
= > Irrelevant Information

I hope this helps :)
_________________

Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 36
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 8

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 22 Feb 2012, 19:47
This question puzzled me a lot more than some of harder CR questions.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 66
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [1] , given: 14

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2012, 04:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
I also had to eliminat the others to come to A:

(A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
(B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly this has been stated
(C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years this need not be true, it says at least 5 centuries

(D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth this is not needed as acceleration is mentioned already

(E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before
we were never told drilling needs to be more feasible for achieving this
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 106
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.28
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 72

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2012, 05:09
eybrj2 wrote:
Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled areas of the world as it is in those already sampled, our current estimate of reserves that exist underground must be multiplied by a factor of 10,000. From this we can conclude that we can meet the oil needs of the entire world for at least five centuries, even assuming that future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

To reach the stated conclusion, the author must assume which of the following?

(A) It is possible to recover the oil contained in unexplored areas of the world
(B) The consumption rate for oil will not grow rapidly
(C) Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
(D) The world will achieve and maintain zero population growth
(E) New technology will make oil discovery and drilling more feasible than ever before


I correctly picked OA as an answer, but I chose it because others didn't make sense.
Can anyone explain the logic that shows why OA is correct ?

I reached the correct answer A by eliminatin the other choices.
B) The statement itself says that the future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.
C) It says for at least 5 centuries and not 500 years so eliminate.
D) As the consumption is increasing , the rise in the population can be one reason behind it and therefore eliminate this option.
E) Out of scope.
_________________

If you like my post, Press +1 KUDO. It is the best way to say Thanks .

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 196
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2012, 01:23
IMO A.... coz that is assumption and others are not
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 213
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 13

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2012, 10:29
I agree with ans choice - A

,and I also agree with C (why is C wrong ?)

isnt 5 centuries = 500 years?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 370
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 31

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2012, 01:39
kuttingchai wrote:
I agree with ans choice - A

,and I also agree with C (why is C wrong ?)

isnt 5 centuries = 500 years?


C. Oil will remain an important energy source for at least 500 years
negate :Oil will not remain an important energy source for at least 500 years

okay so what it is still an energy source, not important though, now as it is an energy source, the same conclusion can again be drawn without any harm i.e. C doesnt affects the conclusion.

Hence C is wrong.

HTH
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If my reply /analysis is helpful-->please press KUDOS
If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2012
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2012, 01:56
This is a strengthen question and thus, the answer to this qns should be a new premise.
C does nothing but repeat what has been written in the passage (500 years).

I agree that A is the right answer.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 196
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2012, 03:48
I agree with ans choice - A
Re: PT #2 CR9 Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2012, 03:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled reply2spg 38 17 Feb 2009, 18:03
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical mm007 10 26 Dec 2006, 11:32
Most geologists believe oil results from chemical sushom101 7 18 Oct 2005, 16:47
Some geologist argue that if oil is as common in unsampled jpv 9 13 Feb 2005, 18:23
CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL gmatblast 9 10 Aug 2004, 13:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some geologists argue that if oil is as common in unsampled

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.