Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2014, 05:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some governments have tried to make alcohol and tobacco

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some governments have tried to make alcohol and tobacco [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2003, 09:39
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:35) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Some governments have tried to make alcohol and
tobacco less attractive to consumers by regulating
what can be shown in advertisements for these prod-
ucts, rather than by banning advertising of them
altogether. However, the need to obey the letter of
these restrictions has actually stimulated advertisers
to create advertisements that are more inventive and
humorous than they were prior to the restrictions'
introduction.

which of the following, if true, would, in conjunc-
tion with the statements above, best support the
conclusion that the government policy described
above fails to achieve its objective?
(A) Because of the revenues gained from the sale of
alcohol and tobacco, governments have no
real interest in making these products less
attractive to consumers.
(B) Advertisers tend to create inventive and humor-
ous advertisements only if they have some
particular reason to do so.
(C) Banning advertising of alcohol and tobacco is a
particularly effective way of making these
products less attractive to consumers.
(D) With the policy in place, advertisements for
alcohol and tobacco have become far more
inventive and humorous than advertisements
for other kinds of products.
(E) The more inventive an advertisement is, the more
attractive it makes the advertised product appear.

The correct answer is E, but I don't know why my answer, D, is wrong?
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 665 [0], given: 781

Re: CR question1 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2003, 10:18
chihao wrote:
Some governments have tried to make alcohol and
tobacco less attractive to consumers by regulating
what can be shown in advertisements for these prod-
ucts, rather than by banning advertising of them
altogether. However, the need to obey the letter of
these restrictions has actually stimulated advertisers
to create advertisements that are more inventive and
humorous than they were prior to the restrictions'
introduction.

which of the following, if true, would, in conjunc-
tion with the statements above, best support the
conclusion that the government policy described
above fails to achieve its objective?
(A) Because of the revenues gained from the sale of
alcohol and tobacco, governments have no
real interest in making these products less
attractive to consumers.
(B) Advertisers tend to create inventive and humor-
ous advertisements only if they have some
particular reason to do so.
(C) Banning advertising of alcohol and tobacco is a
particularly effective way of making these
products less attractive to consumers.
(D) With the policy in place, advertisements for
alcohol and tobacco have become far more
inventive and humorous than advertisements
for other kinds of products.
(E) The more inventive an advertisement is, the more
attractive it makes the advertised product appear.

The correct answer is E, but I don't know why my answer, D, is wrong?



How does D support the argument...

if advertisments became more inventive and humorous...so what?

was the policy meant to regulate the humor and the inventiveness...no..it was meant to regulate the ways in which these advt. could be shown.

but what happened...it actually may cause the product to look more attractive.

thanks
praetorian
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Apr 2003
Posts: 180
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR question1 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2003, 15:40
Hi praetorian
Thank your response...........
But, I'm sorry that I can't understand what you mean for this question?
I'm non-native English...........
So, I maybe need an explanation in simple word.
Sorry!! if you have willing to do so again.............

Anyway...........thank you a lot.............

Chih-Hao
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 13
Location: LA
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2003, 01:22
Perhaps my answer will be clearer than praetorian123 has to offer...

D is wrong because it compares advertisement of alcohol and tobacco against some other advertisements. Sure, the advertisement has become more humorous than it once was....but we don't know if it's more humorous than other products' advertisement. Hope you get it now.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 665 [0], given: 781

Re: CR question1 [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2003, 02:32
chihao wrote:
Hi praetorian
Thank your response...........
But, I'm sorry that I can't understand what you mean for this question?
I'm non-native English...........
So, I maybe need an explanation in simple word.
Sorry!! if you have willing to do so again.............

Anyway...........thank you a lot.............

Chih-Hao


1. Whats the argument ?

Government restrictions on the advertisements did not have the intended impact. advertisers created more inventive and humorous Advertisments.

2. We need something that will support the argument.

D says the advertisments have become more humorous than the other advertisments. But that does not support the argument.

3. Why?

It does not matter if the advertisments are more humorous , inventive than others..Government regulations were meant to reduce the "impact" of these advertisments on the audiences.

Remember, we have to stay " within " the boundaries of the argument.
so we cannot assume that "more inventive and humorus" means "more attractive" or " more sales"

E directly supports the argument...it says the more inventive the Advertisements are , the more attractive it makes the advertised product appear. Government regulations were intended to prevent that.
Re: CR question1   [#permalink] 12 Oct 2003, 02:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Some governments have tried to make alcohol and tobacco less PUNEETSCHDV 2 20 Sep 2012, 21:19
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to chaiku 3 04 Mar 2007, 17:45
The government should stop permitting tobacco companies to AK47 3 21 Jan 2007, 00:26
16 In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco winskc 20 16 Oct 2006, 19:49
They tried to make it trickier. sharadGmat 6 03 Jul 2006, 18:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some governments have tried to make alcohol and tobacco

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.