|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 64
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Some historians of science have argued that science moves [#permalink]
 05 Jan 2005, 08:26
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.
(A) because of the insights of great thinkers but because of
(B) because of the insights of great thinkers as the result of
(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of
(D) through the insights of great thinkers but through
(E) through the insights of great thinkers but result from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 993
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
(C)..
Question stem is testing parallelism as well as idiom.
correct idiom is..... "not so much.... as"
(A), (D) and (E) are out.
Between (B) and (C), (C) maintains parallelism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 137
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Agree with jpv. Idiom is not so much as. Will go with C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 738
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
re reading the question.. yup C is testing both.. idiom and parallelism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2004
Posts: 64
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
not so much because of X as because of Y
is both idiomatic and parallel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
