Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 02:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Some historians of science have argued that science moves

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Some historians of science have argued that science moves [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2005, 19:53
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

78% (03:35) correct 22% (00:46) wrong based on 2 sessions
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.

(A) because of the insights of great thinkers but because of
(B) because of the insights of great thinkers as the result of
(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of
(D) through the insights of great thinkers but through
(E) through the insights of great thinkers but result from
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2005, 20:06
:no
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Jun 2005, 20:07
:oops it should be C (not so much because of....as because of) for parallelism!
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Historians [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 17:00
OA is C. parallel structure.

HIMALAYA wrote:
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.
(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 167
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2005, 17:12
Yes .. Answer has to be "C"

Parallelism is the reason
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Historians [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2005, 12:59
HIMALAYA wrote:
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.

(A) because of the insights of great thinkers but because of
(B) because of the insights of great thinkers as the result of
(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of
(D) through the insights of great thinkers but through
(E) through the insights of great thinkers but result from


I'm not so sure the OA is correct. I think it should be A. And here is why: From a "meaning" perspective the author is trying to employ a contrast. He is saying you dont need "high level thinking" but "mundane" stuff.

Himalaya, if you dont mind me asking, what is the source of this question?
In order to demonstrate the contrast you need to have "but" and not "as".

Anyone care to comment on this ?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Historians [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2005, 19:00
gmataquaguy wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.

(A) because of the insights of great thinkers but because of
(B) because of the insights of great thinkers as the result of
(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of
(D) through the insights of great thinkers but through
(E) through the insights of great thinkers but result from


I'm not so sure the OA is correct. I think it should be A. And here is why: From a "meaning" perspective the author is trying to employ a contrast. He is saying you dont need "high level thinking" but "mundane" stuff.

Himalaya, if you dont mind me asking, what is the source of this question?
In order to demonstrate the contrast you need to have "but" and not "as".

Anyone care to comment on this ?


pls note that we have so much in the not underlined part. so we need as to complete the correct idiom. and also it should be parallel. therefore, it should be C.

if need more explanation, we should request paul, supercat, honghu, saurabhmalpani, banerjee, vithal, praveen, ywilfred and other SC experts. :wink:

it is from a collection of some SC questions, which i got from one of my friend.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 104
Location: Austin, Texas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Historians [#permalink] New post 05 Jun 2005, 21:08
HIMALAYA wrote:
Some historians of science have argued that science moves forward not so much because of the insights of great thinkers but because of more mundane developments, such as improved tools and technologies.

(C) because of the insights of great thinkers as because of



Sometimes you can over-think these bad boys. I'd see no reason to dispute the OA (C), it's just a standard not so much x as y construction.

I'd think any philosophical argument you'd use to attack that, could equally be used to attack any other not so much x as y construction, and that would just get you into trouble.
1 KUDOS received
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2769
Location: New York City
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 254 [1] , given: 4

 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2007, 14:10
1
This post received
KUDOS
i was fooled!!!!!!!

i thought the idiom was Not X but Y
but we have a middleman here. Not SO MUCH X but Y

so the Not X but Y has to look like this to stand
Not so much because of but so much because of

so the correct idiom (that i never seen before) is not so much X as Y
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2295
Followers: 276

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Some historians of science have argued that science moves [#permalink] New post 21 Jul 2014, 04:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Some historians of science have argued that science moves   [#permalink] 21 Jul 2014, 04:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Some historians of science have argued that science moves nik1608nik 1 01 Jul 2009, 14:57
Some historians of science have argued that science moves Mishari 3 10 Jun 2007, 13:54
Some historians of science have argued that science moves Zimmer 3 11 Mar 2007, 05:33
Some historians of science have argued that science moves arjsingh1976 3 24 Nov 2006, 11:32
Some historians of science have argued that science moves prasad_bgv 4 05 Jan 2005, 07:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some historians of science have argued that science moves

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.