Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 May 2013, 03:24
Customize  |  Hide

Some judges complain about statutes that specify mandatory

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some judges complain about statutes that specify mandatory [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 06:20
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Some judges complain about statutes that specify mandatory minimum sentences for criminal offenses. These legal restrictions, they complain, are too mechanical and prevent judges from deciding when a given individual can or cannot be rehabilitated. But that is precisely why mandatory minimum sentences are necessary. History amply demonstrates that when people are free to use their own judgement they invariably believe themselves to act wisely when in fact they are often arbitrary and irrational. There is no reason to think that judges are an exception to this rule.

Which one of the following sentences most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

A) People beleive that they have good judgement but never do
B) Mandatory minimum sentences are too mechanical and reduce judicial discretion.
C) Judges should be free to exercise their own judgement
D) Judges are often arbitrary and irrational
E) Mandatory minimum sentences are needed to help prevent judicial arbitratriness.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 07:16
E should be the answer
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 07:17
E should be the answer
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 356
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 07:26
Another E.

From the argument it is clear that we can weed out A, B and C, as they directly contradict the author's point of view. D is too strongly worded, and that leaves us with the more acceptable E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 08:11
Agree with E.
Director
Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 12:23
Yes, E is my choice too.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 491
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 18:08
I agree with E too, A is too general and other choices are too narrow and does not cover the whole argument, E focuses on the central theme of the passage.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 189
Location: Atlanta , GA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2005, 20:16
E sounds good to me
Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 648
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2005, 00:38
I will disagree with everyone here by choosing (B). The argument states that

These legal restrictions, they complain, are too mechanical and prevent judges from deciding when a given individual can or cannot be rehabilitated.

So mechanical and prevention of use of judges discretion does it. (B).
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 207
Location: Ghana
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2005, 03:33
E looks best.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Director
Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 648
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2005, 02:52
OA ps?
Director
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2005, 13:52
OA is E. I fell for the trap. i chose D. After looking at Darth's explanation i understand how its AC D is too far reaching.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 335
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2005, 17:16
E.

GA
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 30 Jul 2005, 17:56
gmataquaguy wrote:
OA is E. I fell for the trap. i chose D. After looking at Darth's explanation i understand how its AC D is too far reaching.
BTW, this is a key point with RCs too. Be wary of a statement that is too strong or neutral. The answer choices for "conclusion" or "main purpose" type questions usually tend to be moderately conclusive.
  [#permalink] 30 Jul 2005, 17:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Voters who complain about a trusted politician's betrayal Paul 5 04 Apr 2004, 09:39
Popular new posts Some commentators complain that a litigation explosion wunderbar03 11 02 May 2005, 02:07
New posts Some commentators complain that a litigation explosion ywilfred 6 03 Sep 2005, 02:33
Popular new posts Mayor Delmont s critics complain about the jobs that were joemama142000 10 22 Jan 2006, 04:38
Popular new posts Some commentators complain that a litigation explosion in JCLEONES 10 07 Jan 2008, 16:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some judges complain about statutes that specify mandatory

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.