|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 442
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86
Kudos [?]:
352
[0], given: 74
|
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave [#permalink]
 02 Feb 2013, 10:23
Question Stats:
76% (01:41) correct
23% (00:54) wrong based on 1 sessions
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong. (A) its legal definition is someone who is unable (B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable (C) it is legally defined as the inability (D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability (E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable
_________________
Press Kudos if you want to say thanks
Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR
Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 29
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]
02 Feb 2013, 10:31
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.
(A) its legal definition is someone who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(C) it is legally defined as the inability-wordy
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability-Correct
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable - Pronoun must be singular
Please correct me if I am going wrong somewhere........................
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 442
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86
Kudos [?]:
352
[1] , given: 74
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]
03 Feb 2013, 08:10
1
This post received
KUDOS
prasannajeet wrote: Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong.
(A) its legal definition is someone who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable- Pronoun ref not correct
(C) it is legally defined as the inability-wordy
(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability-Correct
(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable - Pronoun must be singular
Please correct me if I am going wrong somewhere........................ Yes prasannajeet, you are correct. In GMAT if you see an underlined part starting with a pronoun, it is highly probable that the sentence is testing pronoun issues. As far as the explanation is concerned (A) contains a meaning error "its legal definition is someone" the definition can not be someone. (E) Clearly contains a pronoun number error. Choices (B), (C) and (D) are not exactly grammatically incorrect, however (D) conveys the meaning without any ambiguity and hence the correct answer choice. Both (B) and (C) have the ambiguous pronoun "its". Vercules
_________________
Press Kudos if you want to say thanks
Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR
Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2011
Posts: 17
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 11
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]
13 Feb 2013, 07:59
Is there a significance to the semicolon here. Is that a reason for the second independent clause to have the 'insanity' explicitly mentioned?
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 442
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 86
Kudos [?]:
352
[0], given: 74
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]
13 Feb 2013, 09:29
ramanujanu wrote: Is there a significance to the semicolon here. Is that a reason for the second independent clause to have the 'insanity' explicitly mentioned? Hi ramanujanu, The word "insanity" is used in the second clause to remove any pronoun reference ambiguity. The importance of the semicolon is not very significant in this question. If we use "it" in the second clause then "it" will have no clear antecedent. In the first clause the word "insane" (an adjective) is used; however a pronoun "it" can not refer to an adjective. That's why we have to explicitly mention "insanity" (a noun) in the second clause. Hope that helps, Vercules
_________________
Press Kudos if you want to say thanks
Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR
Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 259
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 68
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who [#permalink]
13 Feb 2013, 21:47
Some people may believe that a person, who does not behave normally in public, should be declared insane; however its legal definition is someone who is unable to distinguish right from wrong. (A) its legal definition is someone who is unable Its should logically refer to Insane but the subject of previous clause is "a Person" (B) legally, it refers to a person who is unable Pronoun error(C) it is legally defined as the inability Pronoun error(D) the legal definition of insanity is the inability Correct(E) legally, they refer to someone who is unable.. It changes the meaning
_________________
YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Some people may believe that a person, who
[#permalink]
13 Feb 2013, 21:47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|
close
