Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 19:39
Customize  |  Hide

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:15
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.
B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.
C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.
D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.
E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:32
According to the argument experiments serve no purpose if they are not interpreted according to some belief. But this does not prove that experiments are irrelavent.

I would go with (A) on this one.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 11 Oct 2004, 17:54
I'd go with A
Scientific theories depend on beliefs rather than experimentation. Hence, give up some beliefs and you will get the theories you want.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 929
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2004, 19:37
Agree with A. We can still retain the theory by not considering the experimental observations - IF the experiment has a conflict with some theory or set of beliefs.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2004, 21:02
A yes. Looks like I have solved this one
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Oct 2004, 06:26
OA is A
  [#permalink] 14 Oct 2004, 06:26
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious anuramm 4 24 Jul 2004, 22:37
New posts Need some serious help AlexT 5 15 Aug 2005, 05:58
Popular new posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious u2lover 10 14 Jul 2006, 21:03
New posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious durgesh79 3 26 Jun 2008, 21:09
New posts 1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Some philosophers of science claim that no serious skbjunior 4 07 May 2011, 11:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.