Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 May 2013, 17:35
Customize  |  Hide

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2008, 21:09
00:00

Question Stats:

50% (00:00) correct 50% (02:42) wrong based on 0 sessions
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs. If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 101
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR scientific theory [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2008, 23:17
durgesh79 wrote:
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs. If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.


I went for D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 418
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR scientific theory [#permalink] New post 26 Jun 2008, 23:41
durgesh79 wrote:
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs. If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.


Author is trying to prove: Relying on beliefs, scientist can test experimentally any theories. Without beliefs, there is no theory can be tested experimentally.

B,C,D are comparing experimental evidence, IRRELEVANT.
E say: The best theories: We dont care which theory is the best.

A says: We can retain a theory even there is evidence encountering it if we has belief (eliminate other beliefs).

A is best.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1384
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: CR scientific theory [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2008, 13:53
Got A by POE.

ARgument says theories cannot be tested without assuming certain beliefs.
(outside knowlegde: theorems cannot be proved without axioms)

We cannot conclude B,C,D,E from the above information
Re: CR scientific theory   [#permalink] 27 Jun 2008, 13:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious anuramm 4 24 Jul 2004, 22:37
New posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious dj 5 11 Oct 2004, 17:15
New posts Need some serious help AlexT 5 15 Aug 2005, 05:58
Popular new posts Some philosophers of science claim that no serious u2lover 10 14 Jul 2006, 21:03
New posts 1 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Some philosophers of science claim that no serious skbjunior 4 07 May 2011, 11:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.