Some philosophers of science claim that no serious : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 21 Jan 2017, 12:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some philosophers of science claim that no serious

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 0

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2004, 21:37
1
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

57% (02:53) correct 43% (01:56) wrong based on 120 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs. If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.

If you have any questions
New!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 429 [1] , given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2004, 16:54
1
KUDOS
I'd go with A
Scientific theories depend on beliefs rather than experimentation. Hence, give up some beliefs and you will get the theories you want.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Posts: 180
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 158 [1] , given: 10

### Show Tags

07 May 2011, 10:36
1
KUDOS
skbjunior wrote:
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs for we can not interpret any experimental results without replying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A. Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.
B. Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.
C. Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulations.
D. Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulations of scientific theories than to their testing.
E. The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.

According to me its A

author is saying that in order to prove some serious scientific theory one has to ignore or take granted the other body of scientific belief.

B,C,D tells us only about the experiment and thus irrelevant.
E tells us about the best theories thus irrelevant.

A says: a theory, which does not have enough evidences, can be retained, only if we give up some other beliefs.... thats exactly what stimulus tells us

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 07:44
I think its B. My reasoning is that the philsophers ae essentially stating the caveats associated with experimental evidence of their theories. Meaning, they really dont believe its important to prove their theory.
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 09:59
my FA is C (Please provide reasoning with your answers - STOP the spirit of this forum getting under threat!)

My reasons:
A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.
<B> "taking for granted such scientific beliefs" could mean taking for granted a set of universally accepted beliefs - this option goes too far </B>

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.
<B> Eliminate this option as evidence could be relavant to scientific theorizing which is based upon a set of established scientific beliefs</B>

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.
<B> I like the use of the word "more" - very GMATish. Also, this option concisely puts the intended summary of the argument </B>

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.
<B> completely negates whatever is stated in the argument</B>

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.
<B> out of scope of the argument as the author is not trying to compare scientific theories</B>
Manager
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 214
Location: US
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 20:06
sorry guys, the OA is A -

Choice A is the conclusion which follows most directly from the philosophical thesis. If an experimental result is in conflict with some theory or set of beliefs, by discarding those experimental observations, we can retain the theory. Choices B,C, D, are incorrect, because the passage does not address the issue of the relevance of experimentation. Choice E may be true, but does not follow from the argument presented in the passage.
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2004, 16:15
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.
B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.
C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.
D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.
E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2004, 16:32
According to the argument experiments serve no purpose if they are not interpreted according to some belief. But this does not prove that experiments are irrelavent.

I would go with (A) on this one.
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2004, 18:37
Agree with A. We can still retain the theory by not considering the experimental observations - IF the experiment has a conflict with some theory or set of beliefs.
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2004, 20:02
A yes. Looks like I have solved this one
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2004, 05:26
OA is A
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 20:03
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.

Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 21:11
u2lover, this was brutal.

I choose D here.
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2006, 22:05

I can't understand what A is trying to say???? But I rejected others using POE.

I go with A. Will explain, if correct.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 231
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 11:45
first of all, ps_dahiya, that is pretty nasty...and wrong...ahhahaaa

from the passage, I am understanding it as scientific theory can not be tested without some other scientific belief (may be some foundation of science,..ie gravety, atoms...) and that we are not able to interpret them correctly if some of the foundations are not applied.

A. for me, A is restating the passage in a shorter way. Will hold on to it and see if there is something better.

B. irrelevant? passage states that they are relevant...

C and D are comparing "Experimental evidence, testing of scientific theory, and initial formulation"

E. Passage does not talk the "best," more like "no serious scientific theory "

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 473
Location: united states
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 18:42
The paragraph implies that to test the theory, you need to take some scientific beliefs for granted. This means that these scientific beliefs actually form the basis of the formulation of the theory. So, either A or D.
D looks more promising as A talks about giving up other scientific beliefs.

Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs.

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing.

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation.

D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing.

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.

_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 244
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Philosophers of science [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 22:47
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious scientific theory can be tested experimentally without taking for granted some other body of scientific beliefs, for we cannot interpret any experimental results without relying on such beliefs.

If this is true, then which of the following conclusions seems most likely?

A) Any particular scientific theory can be consistently retained, even in the face of apparently incompatible evidence, if we are willing to give up certain other scientific beliefs. conclusion rely on experimental result out

B) Experimental evidence is really irrelevant to scientific theorizing. passage does not says that ..look first sentence

C) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the testing of scientific theories than to their initial formulation. out we are trying to link old scientific beliefs and experiments....
D) Experimental evidence is more relevant to the initial formulation of scientific theories than to their testing. seems the one

E) The best scientific theories are those which are formulated in such a way as to be subject to conclusive experimental refutation.
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 352
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 23:05
I find C to be more appropriate.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2006, 23:14
Spent four minutes on this one and still feel confused.

Using a little reverse psychology, the question writer seems to be testing the difference between C and D because of their similiar nature.

Only (D) relates to the passage as written.

4:14
VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1415
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2006, 19:02
I picked C

OA is A

dahiya, acfuture nice job!!! i really thought this one was tough especially with time constraint

OE:
Choice A is the conclusion which follows most directly from the philosophical thesis. If an experimental result is in conflict with some theory or set of beliefs, by discarding those experimental observations, we can retain the theory.
Choices B,C, D, are incorrect, because the passage does not address the issue of the relevance of experimentation.
Choice E may be true, but does not follow from the argument presented in the passage.
16 Jul 2006, 19:02

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 33 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Some psychologists claim that 3 04 Jan 2014, 01:51
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious 0 04 Jul 2013, 19:17
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious 0 27 Jun 2008, 12:53
1 Some educators claim that it is best that school courses 7 01 Mar 2007, 12:38
Some teachers claim that students would not learn curricular 6 01 Mar 2007, 11:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by