Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 May 2013, 04:42
Customize  |  Hide

Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2005, 22:07
00:00

Question Stats:

76% (01:44) correct 23% (00:38) wrong based on 3 sessions
Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.

A. far exceeds those that humans could consume
B. exceeds by far those humans can consume
C. far exceeds those humans are able to consume
D. exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans
E. far exceed those that humans could consume
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2005, 22:14
Answer is E
Subject - Verb agreement "Amounts...exceed"
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2005, 22:39
A. singular 'exceeds' is wrong
B. 'exceeds by far' is not idiomatic
C. singular 'exceeds' is wrong
D. 'exceed by far' is not idiomatic
E. far exceed those that humans could consume

E is the best choice.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 462
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC laboratory tests [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2005, 07:46
Go with E

A, B and C use exceeds which is wrong
D - awkward/wordy

laxieqv wrote:
Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.

A. far exceeds those that humans could consume
B. exceeds by far those humans can consume
C. far exceeds those humans are able to consume
D. exceed by far those able to be consumed by humans
E. far exceed those that humans could consume
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 167
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2005, 11:20
Subject "amounts" does not agree with verb in A, B and C so those are out

In D, those able to be consumed is an awkward construction

that leaves E
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 06 Oct 2005, 22:14
gsxr pinned the S-V agreement flaw.

Unquestionably E.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2005, 03:25
You all got it!!! :wink:
OE: The plural verb exceed agrees in number with its subject, amounts, and the phrase those that humans could consume conveys the intended meaning clearly and without unnecessary wordiness. In choices A, B and C, the singular exceeds does not agree in number with its plural subject, amounts. Choice B and C omit the conjunction that an omission that is grammatically acceptable, but in the case of this sentense diminishes clarity. In D, the use of the passive voice in the phrase those able to be consumed by humans is unjustified, as it increases wordiness while stating the meaning less precisely: it is accurate to call humans " able", but not to call those( amounts) "able".
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 90 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2005, 07:31
laxieqv> kaitou no setsume o kanpeki ni kaku no wa sugoi desu ne!! Jibun de kakimasu ka? copii to haritsukemasu ka?? kimi wa GMAT o zettai 800 ten dekiru to omoimasu!! Ooen shimasu yo :-D
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 07 Oct 2005, 10:28
( sorry for being off-topic)
@GMATT73: iie, watashi wa mada dame desu :oops: . I am not such a GMAT guru to provide all OAs and OEs myself. Indeed, I grabbed a SC book from my univ's library, which I find a great one. I really don't know its original English version, but I'm sure my book is a Chinese version of one since it contains quite a lot similar examples to those posted here so far. My motto is to share what I've got. Thus, I've posted those SCs with OAs and OEs here. Not to be humble, I indeed still need to learn a lot from all of you here!! :oops:
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2797
Location: New York City
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jun 2007, 13:49
gsr wrote:
Answer is E
Subject - Verb agreement "Amounts...exceed"


the amounts of carcinogins exceed

is there usage of this syntax below?
amount ...exceeds
  [#permalink] 15 Jun 2007, 13:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have likar 13 16 Jul 2006, 06:59
New posts Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have LM 2 23 Jun 2007, 02:18
New posts 7 Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have sondenso 7 03 May 2008, 00:07
New posts Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have tarek99 5 01 Jul 2008, 09:14
Popular new posts 5 Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have Nihit 33 25 Sep 2008, 06:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.