Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 28 Aug 2016, 17:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Some statisticians believe that the method called extreme

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Posts: 30
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Some statisticians believe that the method called extreme [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2011, 11:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (00:00) correct 33% (01:40) wrong based on 6 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Some statisticians believe that the method called extreme value theory (EVT) is a powerful analytical tool. The curves generated by traditional statistical methods to analyze empirical data on human longevity predict that some humans would live beyond 130 years. According to the curves EVT generates, however, the limit on human life spans is probably between 113 and 124 years. To date, no one has lived beyond the upper limits indicated by EVT analysis. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the statements above?

(A) EVT is, in general, a more reliable method for projecting future trends based on past observations than are traditional statistical methods.
(B) EVT fits the data about the highest observed human life spans more closely than do traditional statistical methods.
(C) According to the findings derived through the use of EVT, it is physically impossible for any human being to live longer than 124 years.
(D) Given the results generated by EVT, there is no point in conducting research aimed at greatly extending the upper limit on human life spans.
(E) Traditional statistical methods of empirical data analysis should eventually be replaced by some version of EVT.

I am on B, but my trainer says A, please explain
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: Magoosh
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 293

Kudos [?]: 316 [1] , given: 5

Re: critical reasoning question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2011, 18:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The crucial difference between A and B is that A mentions projecting future trends, while B is about fitting in a pattern of observed data.

I generally find that for CR questions, it helps me to turn them into "equations" so I can just pull out the arguments without getting caught up in wording. The notation is up to you (arrows, math symbols, logic symbols, etc.)-- whatever helps you understand how the facts work together will work:

Traditional methods: predicts humans = 130+
EVT: predicts humans = 113-124
To date: humans != 124+

Every part of answer A matches with a piece of information given in the stem "EVT is, in general, a more reliable method for projecting future trends ("predict", humans = 113-124) based on past observations (humans != 124+) than are traditional statistical methods (predicts humans = 130+)."

Answer B ("EVT fits the data about the highest observed human life spans more closely than do traditional statistical methods.) is incorrect mainly because of the phrase "fits the data". The curves "analyze empirical data on human longevity [to] predict...", so they are creating predictions and new curves based on data (data --> curves) , not fitting existing curves to data (curves --> data). It's slightly out of scope.

Hope that helps, let me know if you have any questions!
_________________

Margarette
Magoosh Test Prep

Intern
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Japan
GMAT Date: 03-29-2012
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 9

Re: critical reasoning question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2011, 19:29
margarette wrote:
Answer B ("EVT fits the data about the highest observed human life spans more closely than do traditional statistical methods.) is incorrect mainly because of the phrase "fits the data". The curves "analyze empirical data on human longevity [to] predict...", so they are creating predictions and new curves based on data (data --> curves) , not fitting existing curves to data (curves --> data). It's slightly out of scope.

I thought that the answer is B and didn't know why B isn't correct. So, your explanation is of great help for me! But I'm wondering I can eliminate incorrect alternatives as they way you did in the actual test...

I need to practice more!
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 6

Re: critical reasoning question [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 12:08
B but needed real good read of explanation to fix my doubt
Re: critical reasoning question   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2011, 12:08
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Many New Yorkers falsely believe that extreme temperatures 7 31 Jul 2011, 14:01
Some statisticians claim that the surest way to increase the 6 13 Dec 2010, 13:08
8 Many New Yorkers falsely believe that extreme temperatures 8 02 Oct 2010, 09:02
1 Some plants have extremely sensitive biological 16 26 Sep 2010, 10:27
Some plants have extremely sensitive biological 4 08 Feb 2008, 07:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Some statisticians believe that the method called extreme

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.