Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 02 Sep 2014, 11:06

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 262
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 9

GMAT Tests User
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 07:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument.

B. Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage.

C. Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

D. Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

E. Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion.
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 08:45
rampuria wrote:
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument.

B. Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage.

C. Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

D. Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

E. Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion.


What is the conclusion?

some thing must be done or so, Anti S regulations must be enacted to to stop unsolicited advertising

The word so and the logical order says that the latter is the C

Down to A & B, I will chose A as it more seems like the background than part of evidence.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 181 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 10:03
A with the similar explanation as by icandy.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 286
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 10:24
rampuria wrote:
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument.

B. Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage.

C. Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

D. Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion.

E. Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion.



Part 2 is the conclusion/inference. So, only A and B remain. The first part is not an evidence; it's a statement that tells us how things were in the past. So, B is out. A should be it.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 10:26
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 11:25
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


My Explanation:

Premise 1: In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement.

Premise 2: but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world.

Premise 3: Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers.

Premise 4: As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day.

Conclusion: Something must be done to stop spam.

Conclusion/Inference: So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.
---> Conclusion because it uses the keyword 'So'
---> Inference because the first sentence of the passage looks more as a conclusion than this one i.e., the second boldfaced statement.

On the basis of above info, we can eliminate at least option C, D & E. Now we have only options A & B left.

If we assume that option A is correct, then the second boldface statement should be the conclusion but IMO, the first statement of the passage should be the conclusion. Also, if you go through option A, it states that the first boldface is a 'Background that the argument depends on'. Do you really think that the argument (conclusion) depends on the first boldface? Had that not been present, we could have still arrived at the conclusion with the help of remaining premises. If anything, the first boldface should only act as a supporting premise.

------------------------
A. Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument. ---> Explained above.

B. Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage. ---> Explained above.

C. Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.

D. Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.

E. Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.
------------------------

So, by process of elimination, I go for option B.

IMO, the options are not worded correctly. Is it from a GMAT source?


Regards,
Technext
_________________

+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++
+++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++

~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 997
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 11:29
Went with B as well.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 286
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 11:52
Technext wrote:
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement; but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world. Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers. As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day. So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.

The two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


My Explanation:

Premise 1: In early days, people seldom received unsolicited email advertisement.

Premise 2: but now that numerous bulk email software and email address finders are developed to collect email address all around the world.

Premise 3: Advertisers use email addresses to market their products and even sell such email lists to other advertisers.

Premise 4: As a result, almost everyone ever get junk email, and sometime several and even tens of annoying emails a day.

Conclusion: Something must be done to stop spam.

Conclusion/Inference: So, relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising.
---> Conclusion because it uses the keyword 'So'
---> Inference because the first sentence of the passage looks more as a conclusion than this one i.e., the second boldfaced statement.

On the basis of above info, we can eliminate at least option C, D & E. Now we have only options A & B left.

If we assume that option A is correct, then the second boldface statement should be the conclusion but IMO, the first statement of the passage should be the conclusion. Also, if you go through option A, it states that the first boldface is a 'Background that the argument depends on'. Do you really think that the argument (conclusion) depends on the first boldface? Had that not been present, we could have still arrived at the conclusion with the help of remaining premises. If anything, the first boldface should only act as a supporting premise.

------------------------
A. Background that the argument depends on and conclusion that can be drawn from the argument. ---> Explained above.

B. Part of evidence that the argument includes, and inference that can be drawn from this passage. ---> Explained above.

C. Pre-evidence that the argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.

D. Background that argument depends on and part of evidence that supports the conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.

E. Pre-evidence that argument includes and a method that helps to supports that conclusion. ---> Second boldface is a conclusion/inference. So, discard it.
------------------------

So, by process of elimination, I go for option B.

IMO, the options are not worded correctly. Is it from a GMAT source?


Regards,
Technext



Technext, you might be right, but what I gather from this passage is that the author is comparing the present situation with the almost spam free world that used to exist in the past. This comparison is vital for the argument, as without knowing how things were before, how would you decide that it's time to pull the plug on spammers.. So, I choose A.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 374
Location: India
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 12:50
I too feel we are inferring instead of drawing conclusion.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 18:25
Nitya, the url is this page itself
nitya34 wrote:
pls try once then only check the url below

t76282-cr-boldface
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2009, 18:28
After reading Technext's explanation, i also feel B shld be the ans. though on exam day, i would have chosen A.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2009, 01:25
sanjay_gmat wrote:
Technext, you might be right, but what I gather from this passage is that the author is comparing the present situation with the almost spam free world that used to exist in the past. This comparison is vital for the argument, as without knowing how things were before, how would you decide that it's time to pull the plug on spammers.. So, I choose A.

Hi sanjay_gmat,


IMO, argument here is the first statement of the passage. If I’m correct then the comparison should not be vital to reach the conclusion (argument). I feel that we can reach the conclusion without its (first boldface) help too.

Let others share their thought on this.


Regards,
Technext
_________________

+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++
+++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++

~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2009, 02:06
Yes ia lso feel the same. If we remove the first BF and try 2 analyze the situation. Then still we can reachthe conclusion
Technext wrote:
sanjay_gmat wrote:
Technext, you might be right, but what I gather from this passage is that the author is comparing the present situation with the almost spam free world that used to exist in the past. This comparison is vital for the argument, as without knowing how things were before, how would you decide that it's time to pull the plug on spammers.. So, I choose A.

Hi sanjay_gmat,


IMO, argument here is the first statement of the passage. If I’m correct then the comparison should not be vital to reach the conclusion (argument). I feel that we can reach the conclusion without its (first boldface) help too.

Let others share their thought on this.


Regards,
Technext
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 06 Mar 2009, 02:19
Ohh
:oops:
post473413.html
post47029.html#p47029
post157318.html#p157318
ritula wrote:
Nitya, the url is this page itself
nitya34 wrote:
pls try once then only check the url below

t76282-cr-boldface

_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 967
Location: Toronto
Followers: 254

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2009, 00:04
I'm curious about the source of the question; while I could find the question in a few threads with a web search, none mentioned where the question was from.

The argument does not depend on the first bold-faced sentence, which rules out A. Still, the second bold-faced sentence is a conclusion, not an inference. An inference is a specific type of conclusion - it's a conclusion that can be deduced from facts, requiring no additional assumptions. An inference is not a viewpoint or a policy proposal. As we all know from GMAT CR questions, conclusions can be weakened or strengthened, and they can be flawed or they can be valid. An inference is always true, as long as the facts are true.

From the evidence presented, you might conclude that regulating junk email would be a good idea. Still, that's a point of view; it's not something you can logically deduce from the facts. It's only a logically valid inference if you make many assumptions not presented in the stem (junk email must be cut down, government regulation will be effective, there is no other alternative way the goal of reducing junk email could be achieved). It's a conclusion, not an inference.
_________________

Nov 2011: After years of development, I am now making my advanced Quant books and high-level problem sets available for sale. Contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com for details.

Private GMAT Tutor based in Toronto

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 111
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2009, 05:42
IanStewart wrote:
I'm curious about the source of the question; while I could find the question in a few threads with a web search, none mentioned where the question was from.

The argument does not depend on the first bold-faced sentence, which rules out A. Still, the second bold-faced sentence is a conclusion, not an inference. An inference is a specific type of conclusion - it's a conclusion that can be deduced from facts, requiring no additional assumptions. An inference is not a viewpoint or a policy proposal. As we all know from GMAT CR questions, conclusions can be weakened or strengthened, and they can be flawed or they can be valid. An inference is always true, as long as the facts are true.

From the evidence presented, you might conclude that regulating junk email would be a good idea. Still, that's a point of view; it's not something you can logically deduce from the facts. It's only a logically valid inference if you make many assumptions not presented in the stem (junk email must be cut down, government regulation will be effective, there is no other alternative way the goal of reducing junk email could be achieved). It's a conclusion, not an inference.

Even I am not totally convinced that the second boldface is an inference. This option was the choice solely based on process of elimination.

This doesn't look like a GMAT question. Can we have the source rampuria?


Regards,
Technext
_________________

+++ Believe me, it doesn't take much of an effort to underline SC questions. Just try it out. +++
+++ Please tell me why other options are wrong. +++

~~~ The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent. ~~~

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 119
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 09 Mar 2009, 09:45
We are wasting our time discussing this question. The stimulus and most of the answer choices contain major grammatical errors. At least one of the answer choices is incomprehensible. There is no point in posting garbage such as this.
_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 162
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 8

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2009, 20:03
I dont think it's a garbage
One more evidence to choose B rather than A is that "relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising" is only a suggestion, so can be considered inference, not a conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- Boldface [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2009, 12:29
I must be thinking totally wrong since E looks best to me.

Rampuria, what is OA?
Re: CR- Boldface   [#permalink] 27 Oct 2009, 12:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people eybrj2 8 15 Dec 2011, 23:06
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people circkit 9 26 Jul 2007, 03:48
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people AK47 8 22 Jan 2007, 04:53
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people sangarelli 20 05 Sep 2006, 06:34
Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people nakib77 7 27 Nov 2005, 10:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Something must be done to stop spam. In early days, people

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.