Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 06:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Sorry for posting this CR again, I know it has been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Location: Basel
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Sorry for posting this CR again, I know it has been [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2007, 04:42
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Sorry for posting this CR again, I know it has been discussed a lot but I can t agree with the OA. In my view , A has to be assumed else the argument falls apart. Here is my explanation:

regulations on local industry increase number of birds

similar regulations in other major cities -> that means, regulations on local industry are expected to have the same effect as in London -> increase number of birds

What if the pollution is not caused by the local industry? The plan of implementing the regulations would be flawed .

Can someone help me on this one?



In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 4

Re: CR - air pollution [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2007, 05:10
tobiastt wrote:
Sorry for posting this CR again, I know it has been discussed a lot but I can t agree with the OA. In my view , A has to be assumed else the argument falls apart. Here is my explanation:

regulations on local industry increase number of birds

similar regulations in other major cities -> that means, regulations on local industry are expected to have the same effect as in London -> increase number of birds

What if the pollution is not caused by the local industry? The plan of implementing the regulations would be flawed .

Can someone help me on this one?



In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.


"almost entirely" in A is too extreme...may be it is only possible to control pollution created by local industry. There can be other sources of pollution too, which are impossible to control.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Location: Basel
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2007, 05:13
I agree that A is a bit too extreme but that the only thing that speaks for A ... in B , air quality is not mentioned in the passage...why is B wrong then?
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 4

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2007, 05:18
tobiastt wrote:
I agree that A is a bit too extreme but that the only thing that speaks for A ... in B , air quality is not mentioned in the passage...why is B wrong then?


I think..we can safely assume that pollution affects the quality of air..and reducing the pollution increases the quality of air.

B says "Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air" That is the reason, author of the argument is recommending pollution control measures in other cities.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 274
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jan 2007, 07:14
This is what I thought.
It is an assumption question by analogy. Just because London saw an increase in the bird sightings with tighter controls on air regulations, the conclusion is that the other cities would also see a similar increase with tighter controls being applied. But the tighter controls is on the local industry and the assumption is air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.

The use of extreme language is reduced by using the word almost entirely as opposed to entirely.

I like A. Would be interested in knowing what is the OA?

axl_oz
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 00:21
I would guess E.

It appears that the argument assumes that an increase in bird sightings is the same as an increase in the number of birds overall. All resulting from the decrease in air pollution.

OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Location: Basel
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2007, 03:39
OA is A - I can t agree with it
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 64
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2007, 20:07
I picked E.

I followed the same logic above when working on this question.
There is no way A is the correct answer.
If the negation test is applied, it can weaken the argument.

I do not agree "almost entirely" is too strong.
In GMAT sense, "almost" does not fall into the "all" category, but in the "some" category.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 45
Location: Seoul
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

[#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2007, 21:19
I would go for A either. The question asks EXCEPT, thus, we need to find an assumption that couldn't be made in the question. A represents the only assumption that is not necessary to reach a conclusion.
a) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
In order to increase the number of birds, reduction in local industry polution is needed. It means that local industry polution might be one of the major causes of polluted air in the city, but not necessarily the main one. The main cause of pollution and birds population increase has nothing to do with each other.
_________________

brainstorm

A   [#permalink] 13 Feb 2007, 21:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
sorry if this problem has already been posted, but I do not djhouse81 7 19 Jun 2007, 05:52
sorry if this problem has already been posted, but I do not djhouse81 5 19 Jun 2007, 05:47
I am sorry if this has been posted before. But I couldnt Priyah 1 02 Nov 2006, 20:42
I know this one has been posted before by Kevincan but i yezz 15 10 Aug 2006, 11:10
Sorry for post it again, but I really want to clear this ong 2 16 Nov 2005, 11:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Sorry for posting this CR again, I know it has been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.