Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Jun 2013, 14:02
Customize  |  Hide

Spectroscopic analysis has revealed the existence of frozen

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 29
Location: SE Michigan
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 09:16
ywilfred wrote:
C doesn't contradict the passage.

We're told nothing on pluto vaporizes faster than methane, and slower than carbon monoxide.

That means there cannot be anything in between methane and carbon monoxide. The order Nitrogen->Carbon Monixide->Methane will not be changed.

In fact, A can be refuted to say there are other substances like frozen oxygen, and they could be higher in quantity. C cannot be challenged by this assumption even if you really had frozen oxygen, because we know that this frozen oxygen is not going to vaporize faster than methan and slower than carbon monoxide.


I disagree.


A few thing's I'd like to mention.

1. Ice vaporizes and produces gas. THe more vapor there is, the more concentration of that gas in the atmosphere. ( I think ywilfed is probably taking it to mean the other way i.e. more vaporization means less concentration in the atmosphere.)

2. So, from the passage, Nitrogen vaporizes faster than the other tow in the order Nitrogen > Carbon Mono > Methane, given that we start with similar quantities of each. If we start with 2 m^3 of Nitro vs. 100000 m^3 of methane, after a certain amount of time, the amount of Nitro gas in the atmosphere is going to be proportional to the 2m^3 even though it vaporizes much faster.


Choice C => There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.
which contradicts #2 above. There actually are two substances that vaporize more readily than methane.

I see your point abt frozen oxygen, but with the given info, choice A is still the best.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR030119--spectroscopic [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 10:24
This question puzzles me too. The question stem could lead to many good choices but the choices given are not exactly what you'd expect. Anyways here's what I think.

Fact: There are frozen N2, Methane, and CO on the surface of Pluto.
Fact: Such ice tend to vaporize and produce an atmosphere.
Fact: The proportion of any gas depends on how readily the corresponding ice vaporizes.
Conclusion: The components of Pluto's atmosphere are N2, CO, and methane, with N2>CO>Methane.

Ask for assumptions.

The obviouse assumption I can see from the passage is that N2 is more readily vaporized CO follows, and Methane is least readily vaporized.

(A) There is no more frozen nitrogen on the surface of Pluto than there is either frozen carbon monoxide or methane.
This almost feels like the only possible correct answer that they want to test you. However it should have been "there is no less frozen nitrogen than carbon monoxide or methane", instead of "no more... than". The way it is formulated now, it doesn't seem to be an assumption that the scientists need to make. Even if there is more frozen N2 than the others, this would make the N2 gas more abundant than the others, and will not overthrow the conclusion.

(B) Until space probes reach Pluto, direct analysis of the atmosphere is impossible.
This is a bit out of scope I think.

(C) There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.
This looks like a trap. What one is supposed to think is that "well what if there's some other frozen gas that is not discovered whose readiness to vaporize is between Methane and CO?" However, I think the way the conclusion is spelled out has ruled out this possibility. The conclusion says "The components of Pluto's atmosphere are" this this and that. In other words, it didn't say these three are in the atmosphere. The subtle difference to me is that the second way you can say other things may also be in the atmosphere, but the first way you are sure the only components are these three.

(D) Nitrogen is found in the atmosphere of a planet only if nitrogen ice is found on the surface of that planet.
As I said before, the problem with this is "only if".

(E) A mixture of nitrogen, carbon monoxide, and methane is characteristic of the substances from which the Solar System formed.
I tried to see if there's something here. But it looked out of scope to me.

Therefore among the five choices C looks like the closest to me.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 29
Location: SE Michigan
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 10:41
HongHu,
What do you think about the point I raised that C contradicts the passage?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 10:44
amit_upasani@hotmail.com wrote:
HongHu,
What do you think about the point I raised that C contradicts the passage?


Can C really contradict the passage ? It doesn't. If there was some other gases (assuming there are any), then (C) ensures that the order Nitrogen > CO > Methane is not going to be upset in anyway.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 10:45
amit_upasani@hotmail.com wrote:
ywilfred wrote:
C doesn't contradict the passage.

We're told nothing on pluto vaporizes faster than methane, and slower than carbon monoxide.

That means there cannot be anything in between methane and carbon monoxide. The order Nitrogen->Carbon Monixide->Methane will not be changed.

In fact, A can be refuted to say there are other substances like frozen oxygen, and they could be higher in quantity. C cannot be challenged by this assumption even if you really had frozen oxygen, because we know that this frozen oxygen is not going to vaporize faster than methan and slower than carbon monoxide.


I disagree.


A few thing's I'd like to mention.

1. Ice vaporizes and produces gas. THe more vapor there is, the more concentration of that gas in the atmosphere. ( I think ywilfed is probably taking it to mean the other way i.e. more vaporization means less concentration in the atmosphere.)

I do get the point that more vaporization will result in a higher concentration of that gas in the atmosphere, and that's what I've been hitting at in this thread. We are told there is a direct relationship between vaporization of the frozen gas, and the proportion of that gas in the atmosphere. The faster the frozen gas vaporizes, the more of that gas we get.

2. So, from the passage, Nitrogen vaporizes faster than the other tow in the order Nitrogen > Carbon Mono > Methane, given that we start with similar quantities of each. If we start with 2 m^3 of Nitro vs. 100000 m^3 of methane, after a certain amount of time, the amount of Nitro gas in the atmosphere is going to be proportional to the 2m^3 even though it vaporizes much faster.


Choice C => There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.
which contradicts #2 above. There actually are two substances that vaporize more readily than methane.

I see your point abt frozen oxygen, but with the given info, choice A is still the best.


Let's look at it another way. I'll employ the diagramming method I used earlier on, and insert the assumption in, then we'll see which one really plug the gap and hold the conclusion up. Also, we'll use the 'therefore' test to see if it fits in logically with the conclusion.

Here's the diagram of the passage.

1) Spectroscopic analysis revealed existence of frozen nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide on surface of pluto
2) Such ice have tendency to vaporize, producing an atmosphere
3) Proportion of any gas in atmosphere depends directly on how readily corresponding ice vaporize
4) Therefore, Astronomers concluded that components of Pluto's atmosphere are nitrogen, Carbon monixide and methane in decreasing abundance.

Clearly, something is missing. The astronomers managed to conclude Nitrogen > CO > Methane in the atmosphere, just from the premise these ice vaporize to produce an atmosphere. We need something else, an assumption, to hold up the conclusion.

Let's try A. where I inserted it as premise 4 in the diagram.

1) Spectroscopic analysis revealed existence of frozen nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide on surface of pluto
2) Such ice have tendency to vaporize, producing an atmosphere
3) Proportion of any gas in atmosphere depends directly on how readily corresponding ice vaporize
4) There is no more frozen nitrogen on the surface of Pluto than there is either frozen carbon monoxide or methane.
5) Therefore, Astronomers concluded that components of Pluto's atmosphere are nitrogen, Carbon monixide and methane in decreasing abundance.
Does it help understand why the astronomers made that conclusion ? It doesn't.

Now let's try C, where I inserted as premise 4 in the diagram.

1) Spectroscopic analysis revealed existence of frozen nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide on surface of pluto
2) Such ice have tendency to vaporize, producing an atmosphere
3) Proportion of any gas in atmosphere depends directly on how readily corresponding ice vaporize
4) There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide
5) Therefore, Astronomers concluded that components of Pluto's atmosphere are nitrogen, Carbon monixide and methane in decreasing abundance.

Now this ties in more logically and the Astrnomers could conclude why it is Nitrogen > CO > Methan and not any other order.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2322
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 158 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 10:46
amit_upasani@hotmail.com wrote:
Choice C => There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.
which contradicts #2 above. There actually are two substances that vaporize more readily than methane.


There are two substances that vaporize more readily than methane, but neither of them vaporize less readily than CO. So in other words, no substance vaporizes more readily than methane and less readily than CO. Therefore it is ok, not contraditing to your point #2.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Posts: 29
Location: SE Michigan
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 11:37
>> (C) There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.

Oops, my bad on C contradicts the passage. I read an "or" instead of but. So I agree that C does not contradict the passage.

However, it fills only one of the gaps. Nitro still has two positions left in the hierarchy.

What's the OA?
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5134
Location: Singapore
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 89 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 19:38
amit_upasani@hotmail.com wrote:
>> (C) There is no frozen substance on the surface of Pluto that vaporizes more readily than methane but less readily than carbon monoxide.

Oops, my bad on C contradicts the passage. I read an "or" instead of but. So I agree that C does not contradict the passage.

However, it fills only one of the gaps. Nitro still has two positions left in the hierarchy.

What's the OA?


Agree with you that (C) does fill only one gap, but i feel it holds up the conclusion much stronger than (A).

I'll stick with (C).

OA ?
VP
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2005, 20:01
Thank you all

All in all, the OA is indeed C.

Welcome more discussions.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 657
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR030119--spectroscopic [#permalink] New post 07 May 2011, 11:53
another tricky one , where the exact wordings of an option can not be overlooked , i got this wrong. 'less readily than CO but more readily than methane' this sets a boundary condition between which no other substance can lie, and the way it is worded , makes one think about nitrogen being the substance which is more readily vaporized.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Re: CR030119--spectroscopic   [#permalink] 07 May 2011, 11:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts a poll has revealed that 95% of the residents of essex surat 6 07 Jan 2004, 07:38
New posts Spectroscopic analysis has revelaed the existence of frozen afife76 4 24 Jul 2004, 08:28
New posts Spectroscopic analysis has revelaed the existence of frozen afife76 5 04 Aug 2004, 19:10
New posts Experts publish their posts in the topic Spectroscopic analysis has revealed the existence of frozen metallicafan 3 10 May 2012, 09:44
New posts 5 Experts publish their posts in the topic The existence of water on Mars has been the focus of intense actleader 7 31 Oct 2012, 12:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Spectroscopic analysis has revealed the existence of frozen

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.