Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 04:48
Customize  |  Hide

Spending on research and development by United States

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Spending on research and development by United States [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2005, 01:55
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8% over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 - when outlays for reserch and development increase 16.4% over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25% tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

A: Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.
B: Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.
C: Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
D: In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
E: Tax credits marked for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.
_________________

Best regards,

VP
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1255
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - R&D [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2005, 02:10
Taku wrote:
Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8% over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 - when outlays for reserch and development increase 16.4% over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25% tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

A: Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.
B: Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.
C: Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
D: In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
E: Tax credits marked for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.


1980-1981 16.4%
1983-1984 8%
------------------------
downward trend
------------------------
conclusion: 25% tax credit did little or nothing.
--------------------------------------
ask for assumption:
the argument said 25% tax credit did little or nothing.
To support the conclusion, we can assume that if no 25%, the downard trend might exist or not exist. That is, try to mitigate the necessary of 25% tax credit.

So, D is the answer

That's like the rule of thumb. If A, then B, if not A, then not B. Support!
Director
Director
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 589
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Mar 2005, 13:26
D)
Think about it, you will figure it out.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 50
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2005, 11:18
My answer D
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1581
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - R&D [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2005, 14:57
D: In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 08 Feb 2005
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Mar 2005, 15:20
Another one for 'D'
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - R&D [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2005, 01:21
As everyone went with, yes OA is (D). Mine was (E)....

Hello chunjuwa,
you are stating "if A, then B, if not A, then not B". In this case, would (D) mean " if there is no tax credit, business spending for R&D after 1981 would be nearly the same as it was". Am I correct?


chunjuwu wrote:
Taku wrote:
Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8% over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 - when outlays for reserch and development increase 16.4% over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25% tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

A: Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.
B: Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.
C: Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
D: In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
E: Tax credits marked for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.


1980-1981 16.4%
1983-1984 8%
------------------------
downward trend
------------------------
conclusion: 25% tax credit did little or nothing.
--------------------------------------
ask for assumption:
the argument said 25% tax credit did little or nothing.
To support the conclusion, we can assume that if no 25%, the downard trend might exist or not exist. That is, try to mitigate the necessary of 25% tax credit.

So, D is the answer

That's like the rule of thumb. If A, then B, if not A, then not B. Support!

_________________

Best regards,

Re: CR - R&D   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2005, 01:21
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Spending on research and development by United States saurya_s 6 31 Aug 2004, 14:51
New posts From 1965 to 1988, spending on food in the United States gayathri 9 17 Jan 2005, 20:53
New posts Spending on research and development by United States kdhong 7 08 Aug 2005, 20:48
New posts In developed countries, such as the United States, the x97agarwal 6 12 Jul 2008, 20:56
Popular new posts Spending on research and development by United States ykaiim 11 08 May 2010, 05:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Spending on research and development by United States

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.