Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 12:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 0

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false [#permalink] New post 23 Sep 2006, 23:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

63% (02:28) correct 38% (00:42) wrong based on 8 sessions
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.
B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.
C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.
D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.
E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.

Highlight below for the answer.

OA is C. Am not impressed. Am thinking that A answers/supports better than option C, as A negates the Prank calls by tracing back to the person who called, without compromising the ability of the people to report.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 245
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2006, 06:00
I agree with C, since the statement said that a vast majority were prank calls but not all, since there could be still some correct calls from fire alarm boxes, once boxes are removed, there will be no doubt left. Private phones are still numerous to report fire.

C is a very strong statement, nature and size of fire is very important so it gives the strongest support
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2006, 08:27
I did not go with C for two reasons.

i) C is not clear on whether it is referring to Private or Public phones.
ii) Also the question is more on how to reduce the prank calls. C gives us no explanation on how prank calls are/will be reduced. Some one in City A can call from a telephone and say that City B building X is on fire.

However if we do consider A as the option

i) It supports that Prank calls can be reduced as we can clearly trace to the person who used the private phone
ii) As almost every one has access to private phone, people can still report the alarms.

What do you think?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2006
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2006, 08:37
The basic purpose is: Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls.

So it's A cause the objective is to reduce false calls and A supports that conclusion. Also POE is good: B,C and D support the removal but NOT the reasons of the Fire Commissioner.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 385
Location: TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2006, 08:40
I think this should be A .

A clearly address the assumption that a telephone call is as easily traceable as a fire alarm call and can clearly function as one.

Do you have the OE for this ?
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 Sep 2006, 19:17
posted before. Answer is A.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 05:59
OK - I wanted to open this up again. Sometime ago this question was disucssed. One source claimed the OA is C with which I agreed. However discussions amidst the august house yielded A as the answer. People did not agree with C.

My reasoning for C is this -

The fact that removing the alarm boxes will eliminate Prank calls has been stated directly in the passage. So, there's no further corroboration required on that front.

C affirms that a Phone call can better describe the size and nature of the fire (thus establishing a direct advantage over a fire alarm call from the sought-to-be-displaced alarm box). Thus C asserts and validates what has been announced in the passage that removing the alarm box will reduce prank calls without hampering people's ability to report fires.

Please provide your opinion(s)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Commissioner [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 08:31
withme wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.
B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.
C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.
D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.
E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.

Highlight below for the answer.

OA is C. Am not impressed. Am thinking that A answers/supports better than option C, as A negates the Prank calls by tracing back to the person who called, without compromising the ability of the people to report.


This one is hard - we want to make sure we understand and address the question asked at hand: Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

Main conclusion: proposal to remove the fire alarm boxes
Supporting conclusion: removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people's ability to report a fire

Based on this information, I feel answer A is the best since being able to trace the calls to the origin would deter and reduce the prank calls and since everyone has access to telephones (as stated in the argument), it would still give everyone access.

Any other thoughts?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 14:58
I think A is a better answer.
It is the only answer claiming to solve two issues. Firstly, it reduces the numberr of prank calls while establishing identity of the caller.
Secondly, it ensures that the reporting ability of the public will not be compromised.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2007, 15:17
dwivedys wrote:
OK - I wanted to open this up again. Sometime ago this question was disucssed. One source claimed the OA is C with which I agreed. However discussions amidst the august house yielded A as the answer. People did not agree with C.

My reasoning for C is this -

The fact that removing the alarm boxes will eliminate Prank calls has been stated directly in the passage. So, there's no further corroboration required on that front.

C affirms that a Phone call can better describe the size and nature of the fire (thus establishing a direct advantage over a fire alarm call from the sought-to-be-displaced alarm box). Thus C asserts and validates what has been announced in the passage that removing the alarm box will reduce prank calls without hampering people's ability to report fires.

Please provide your opinion(s)


Agree with C. Proposal to remove alarm box is already made. We need to show more reason(s) as to why this is justified. C does it.

"A" requires you make assumptions. Ability to trace back says nothing by itself, unless a clear link is showed as to how it could help
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Commissioner [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 09:56
bump
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2501
Followers: 53

Kudos [?]: 506 [0], given: 19

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Commissioner [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 13:20
withme wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from.
B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately five million dollars annually.
C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.

Highlight below for the answer.
OA is C. Am not impressed. Am thinking that A answers/supports better than option C, as A negates the Prank calls by tracing back to the person who called, without compromising the ability of the people to report.


Tough call among a, C and D.

Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire. and C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.

same. so c is logical.
_________________

Verbal: new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 217 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Commissioner [#permalink] New post 11 Jan 2009, 13:49
Whew! Extremely close.

The proposed effect is "Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire"

C is just throwing out extra info

A is saying that The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from


Stimulus does not state that telephone calls are traceable. We cannot assume that they are traceable. Alarm boxes provide the traceability option because the FD knows the locations. Every home has a phone. If FD cannot trace it, the plan will not have announced effect. So it is needed for the plan to have the announced effect.

A is good.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: ==GMAT Ninja==
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Schools: ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - Commissioner [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2011, 22:26
withme wrote:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms
are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street
corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone,
these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we
propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the
number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the
proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?

A. The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones
and records where they came from.
B. Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately
five million dollars annually.
C. A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information
about the nature and size of a fire than can an alarm placed
from an alarm box.
D. Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s
capacity for responding to fires.
E. On any given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones
in Springfield are out of service.

Highlight below for the answer.

OA is C. Am not impressed. Am thinking that A answers/supports better than option C, as A negates the Prank calls by tracing back to the person who called, without compromising the ability of the people to report.


Brother OA is A only
you must have seend wrong answer
its 109th question in OG12th edition
go back to the book again
although i got it wrong i marked C :( :( :(
_________________

WarLocK
_____________________________________________________________________________
The War is oNNNNNNNNNNNNN for 720+
see my Test exp here http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-test-experience-111610.html
do not hesitate me giving kudos if you like my post. :)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: ==GMAT Ninja==
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Posts: 247
Schools: ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 46

GMAT Tests User
Re: [#permalink] New post 25 Jun 2011, 22:33
dwivedys wrote:
OK - I wanted to open this up again. Sometime ago this question was disucssed. One source claimed the OA is C with which I agreed. However discussions amidst the august house yielded A as the answer. People did not agree with C.

My reasoning for C is this -

The fact that removing the alarm boxes will eliminate Prank calls has been stated directly in the passage. So, there's no further corroboration required on that front.

C affirms that a Phone call can better describe the size and nature of the fire (thus establishing a direct advantage over a fire alarm call from the sought-to-be-displaced alarm box). Thus C asserts and validates what has been announced in the passage that removing the alarm box will reduce prank calls without hampering people's ability to report fires.

Please provide your opinion(s)


I Agree with your reasoning man
thats why only i chose C as the answer
but unfortunately the OA is A...OG 12th Edition 109th question :roll: :roll:
_________________

WarLocK
_____________________________________________________________________________
The War is oNNNNNNNNNNNNN for 720+
see my Test exp here http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-test-experience-111610.html
do not hesitate me giving kudos if you like my post. :)

Re:   [#permalink] 25 Jun 2011, 22:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
26 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false gmatbull 19 22 Mar 2010, 12:29
Q22. Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of alimad 2 19 Jun 2008, 14:50
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false prasannar 3 27 Apr 2008, 10:57
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false singh_amit19 9 17 Oct 2007, 11:57
Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false jerrywu 8 12 Sep 2006, 05:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.