Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 03 May 2016, 18:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 159 [2] , given: 51

### Show Tags

12 May 2011, 08:31
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (01:58) correct 23% (01:22) wrong based on 840 sessions

### HideShow timer Statictics

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 27
Page: 125
Difficulty:

State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson’s argument?

(A) In the spokesperson’s state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past six years than it has in several other states.
(B) Adequacy of a state’s road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing business there than is the availability of qualified employees.
(C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have moved into the state.
(D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state’ road system depends on both the area and the population of the state.
(E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road improvements.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Last edited by Narenn on 16 Oct 2013, 07:44, edited 2 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1353
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

12 May 2011, 22:29
A,C and D clearly misses the point.

B and E debunk the conclusion.

B - brings along a new element into consideration.
E - Gives a qualified reasoning for money/mile.

E.

timing is around 1min and 10 sec.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 159 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

13 May 2011, 03:03
mine is 1:09 min . will post the OA soon .
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1673
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

16 May 2011, 02:20
I got E in 45 sec. E clearly suggests that the suspicion of Businesspeople could be correct, while the spokesperson is trying to deviate the actual reason by masking it with another explanation.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 07:25
E in 1:08
Intern
Joined: 09 May 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 13:11
Can someone explain why D) cannot be the right answer.
Current Student
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 326
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V46
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 13:21
D is incorrect as we have no information as to how many people are in the state vs other states so it's a non starter. Further, it doesn't really weaken the argument. Even if we knew that per capita spending was low in this state, it doesn't necessarily imply that the roading quality was low.

Posted from my mobile device
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2022
Followers: 154

Kudos [?]: 1420 [0], given: 376

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 13:36
eshabhide wrote:
Can someone explain why D) cannot be the right answer.

The passage doesn't give us any information as to how the determining factors for miles of road may influence the adequacy of the road system. Thus, "D" is merely an information which is detached from the argument or reasoning. Out of scope.

"E" is a very strong contender because it proves the argument's reasoning, relatively higher spending, as an effect of inadequate road system, directly undermining the argument that people were mistaken in their belief.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 83
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 42

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 16:10
chose E in 1:05
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 267
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

17 May 2011, 19:12
E
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [1] , given: 5

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2012, 19:40
1
KUDOS
I chose E for this question:

The conclusion of this passage is: [highlight]Those people are mistaken.[/highlight]

A. Although this answer choice may appear to weaken the argument, the fact that this state still spends more money per mile on road improvements still stands. Therefore, this answer is incorrect.

B. We are not concerned about what a business person finds important. We are trying to highlight a weakness with the relationship between adequate road systems and amount of money spent.

C. The answer choice does not specifically mention that the people leaving the state are doing so because of the roads. Also, the statement says that similar amounts of people are entering the state as leaving, so this wouldn't weaken the argument anyway.

D. We are not concerned about the number of miles of roads and what they depend on.

E. This answer choice illustrates a point that large amount of spending is needed to improve roads that are inadequate. Therefore, this is the correct choice.
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 31

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2012, 23:19
E is the best among the options
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 174
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 24

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 02:46
E Shows that spending large amounts in fact goes against his argument
Current Student
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 915
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 519 [0], given: 322

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 01:43
A silly point with a silly doubt:

each of the past six years, our state
has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.

improvements.

Ok accepted that states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts .

But this state has already spent more in last six years, so it can be the case that CURRENTLY it has adequate ROAD system as the spokesperson talks about PRESENT and not PAST status of ROAD system.

Why (D) cannot be correct.

As in new information answers we are allowed to assume 1-2 assumptions as per RON's videos.

Per (D) it can be true that the state's population and SIZE is more and thus the $$/mile would be more. And this More$$/mile wouldn't necessarily imply the ADEQUATE ROAD SYSTEM

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Current Student
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [2] , given: 309

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2013, 06:55
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
TGC wrote:
A silly point with a silly doubt:

each of the past six years, our state
has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.

improvements.

Ok accepted that states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts .

But this state has already spent more in last six years, so it can be the case that CURRENTLY it has adequate ROAD system as the spokesperson talks about PRESENT and not PAST status of ROAD system.

The question stem says that this state is spending more money per mile compared to other states. This amount is relative to the amount of money spent by other states. But, the statement doesn't say whether the money that was spent by this state was sufficient to get the road system to a adequate condition.

Let us say that the road system of this state was absolutely horrible 6 years ago, whereas the road system of other states were already in a great condition. The other states with good road system may have to spend only $1 per mile to maintain it. But, this state may have to spend$10 per mile to get the roads to a good condition. Now, if the state with bad roads spends only $2 per mile, it satisfies the condition that it is spending more than other states, but, the road condition is not going to improve considerably because$10 per mile is necessary.

From Option E we can infer that if a state is spending lot of money on roads then it has inadequate road systems. If the state's road condition had improved because of the amount of money invested by the state, then after say 3 or 4 years the state's spending on road system should have decreased. But the question stem says that this state has been spending more than other states from the past 6 years. So, there is a good chance that the roads of this state are still in a bad state.

TGC wrote:
Why (D) cannot be correct.

As in new information answers we are allowed to assume 1-2 assumptions as per RON's videos.

Per (D) it can be true that the state's population and SIZE is more and thus the $$/mile would be more. And this More$$/mile wouldn't necessarily imply the ADEQUATE ROAD SYSTEM

Option D doesn't give much information. The number of miles depends on the area of the state. So, the number of miles of road system is more for a state with bigger area and population. If the number of miles is more, then the TOTAL amount of money spent on road system may be more. But the question stem says spending PER MILE.

Eg: A state with 100 miles may have to spend $100 A state with 500 miles may have to spend$500

The spending per mile for both the states is \$1. So, the number of miles within a state doesn't help in weakening or strengthening the argument as the question stem says that the spending per mile is more for this state compared to other states.

Hope this helps.
Director
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 633
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Followers: 39

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 292

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 03:52
I was trapped for D, my efficiency has decreased in CR for not practicing from more than 45 days.
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Manager
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 103
Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 31

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2014, 02:57
I was trapped in D. Mistakenly, I assumed the dependencies in positive side.
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 291
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 46

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2014, 12:19
Got E in 00:35.. How I wish I can repeat this performance on D-Day !!
Manager
Status: Please do not forget to give kudos if you like my post
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 128
Location: United States (CA)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 257

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2014, 19:18
to break the conclusion one must look for why this state needs to spend so much money on road improvement and E correctly undermines the conclusion.

garimavyas wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 27
Page: 125
Difficulty:

State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to our state believe that we have an inadequate road system. Those people are mistaken, as is obvious from the fact that in each of the past six years, our state has spent more money per mile on road improvements than any other state.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the spokesperson’s argument?

(A) In the spokesperson’s state, spending on road improvements has been increasing more slowly over the past six years than it has in several other states.
(B) Adequacy of a state’s road system is generally less important to a businessperson considering doing business there than is the availability of qualified employees.
(C) Over the past six years, numerous businesses have moved into the state.
(D) In general, the number of miles of road in a state’ road system depends on both the area and the population of the state.
(E) Only states with seriously inadequate road systems need to spend large amounts of money on road improvements.

_________________

[Reveal] Spoiler:

Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 14

### Show Tags

17 Feb 2016, 03:58
pike wrote:
D is incorrect as we have no information as to how many people are in the state vs other states so it's a non starter. Further, it doesn't really weaken the argument. Even if we knew that per capita spending was low in this state, it doesn't necessarily imply that the roading quality was low.

Posted from my mobile device

Large spending was also not talked about in argument. Given that "spent more money per mile" doesn't mean that State spent large amount of money. Spending can be high only if area of state is large and if area is less then total spending will be less too.
State spokesperson: Many businesspeople who have not been to   [#permalink] 17 Feb 2016, 03:58
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
18 Art restorers who have been studying 4 16 Oct 2013, 07:40
3 Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiles brings many 4 21 Jul 2012, 17:18
Older United States automobiles have been identified as 9 08 Mar 2008, 08:19
State Spokesperson: Many business people who have not been 3 23 May 2007, 19:56
Older United States automobiles have been identified as 4 16 Nov 2006, 05:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by