Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 05:22

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 798
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 02:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.
Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.

If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturerâ€™s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining companyâ€™s own business
(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
(E) establishes that even the mining companyâ€™s business will prosper if the mining companyâ€™s proposal is rejected
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

If you have any questions
New!
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1731
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 05:20
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining companyâ€™s own business
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 484
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 06:09
IMO clearly C
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 38
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 06:16
I'll go for B.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2005
Posts: 363
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 06:42
I think C
Manager
Joined: 03 Sep 2005
Posts: 135
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 14:37
Can someone explain how importing quota would be a negative effect? Doesn't that mean that the prices from other countries will be higher, thus, more people would purchase from US?
_________________

Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the number of moments that take your breath away.

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 14:47
trulyblessed wrote:
Can someone explain how importing quota would be a negative effect? Doesn't that mean that the prices from other countries will be higher, thus, more people would purchase from US?

Not necessarily. It's the whole supply and demand thing. The mining company is proposing a quota on RAW copper.

If only a certain amount of copper is let into the country then US companies will have to buy more US copper at the US price (higher than international).

That increased cost will be passed on to consumers in the form of a higher price for US copper wire. Sales will go down because the US copper wire is more expensive than foreign made copper wire (at the lower foreign price.)
Director
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 904
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 15:50
Agree with (C). The proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining companyâ€™s own business
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 798
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

13 Sep 2005, 16:43
OA is C.
Though, I got stuck between C and E. Why not E? IS it becasue it uses thw word prosper (which we are not sure of?)
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Intern
Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 13:05
E) assumes too much. We do not know if mining company's business will prosper under any conditions
CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2911
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 13:18
C

If the demand for US copper will go down then, along with wire manufacturer company's business, the business of mining company will also go down.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2006
Posts: 276
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 179 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 16:08
It's C.
_________________

Trying hard to achieve something unachievable now....

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 17:15
The copper mining company says import quotas should be imposed to protect interests of local mining companies (keep higher price than overseas miners). The copper wire manufacturers counters this by saying that keeping the price levels high will cause decline in sales and subsequently demand for U.S Copper (by the mere fact they purchase mainly U.S copper).

C shows the relationship between the two statements clearly. By imposing quotas, the mining companies will not lower prices to stay competitive. This will result in the manufacturers having to pass on the cost to consumers, which will in turn cause a drop in sales. Drop in sales will result in less demand from manufacturers for U.S copper. This hurts the mining company's buisness.

E is not so good as nothing from the two statements suggests that the mining company's business will prosper (key word here) even without imposing quotas.

C is good.
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 576
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 18:52
C.

If the import quotas are imposed then the wire manufacturers will be forced to buy copper at lower prices from the international markets which will hurt the copper mining industry in the US.
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Jul 2006, 21:01
Clear winner C

The wire manufacturer makes it clear that without international level prices their sales will go down which will lead to a decreased demand in copper. And since their inventory is 70% cooper from US mines, a decreased demand will hamper the mining companies as well
Intern
Joined: 20 May 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Los Angles
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Jul 2006, 05:22
C Should be.
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1575
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 2

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Feb 2008, 18:56
clear C for me. After reading the second statement, its clear that the wire manufacturer is saying that if what the mining company wants actually happens, it will only end up hurting the mining company !!
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 793
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - US Copper [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Feb 2008, 23:16
(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company [ not self-serving – clearly points out the affect on the Copper industry – eliminate it]

(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company [It is not presupposing – eliminate it]

(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining company’s own business [hold it]

(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business [Has provided information and reason – eliminate it]

(E) establishes that even the mining company’s business will prosper if the mining company’s proposal is rejected [Hold it]

Between C and E: never mentions mining company business will prosper

Re: CR - US Copper   [#permalink] 22 Feb 2008, 23:16
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 11 17 Aug 2009, 07:07
1 Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 2 27 Jun 2009, 07:52
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 4 04 Aug 2008, 10:29
5 Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 7 07 May 2008, 09:58
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 5 06 Aug 2007, 04:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by