Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 14:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2005
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2006, 21:13
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import quotas should be imposed on the less expensive copper mined outside the country to maintain the price of copper in this country; otherwise, our companies will not be able to stay in business.
Response of a United States copper wire manufacturer: United States wire and cable manufacturers purchase about 70 percent of the copper mined in the United States. If the copper prices we pay are not at the international level, our sales will drop, and then the demand for United States copper will go down.
If the factual information presented by both companies is accurate, the best assessment of the logical relationship between the two arguments is that the wire manufacturerâ€™s argument

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining companyâ€™s own business
(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
(E) establishes that even the mining companyâ€™s business will prosper if the mining companyâ€™s proposal is rejected
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 476
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2006, 22:25
C impled the same thing what argument says.
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5238
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2006, 06:55
Agreed. (C) looks like the wire manufacturer has a legitimate reason to keep copper prices at the (low) international level.
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 269
Location: Chennai,India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2006, 12:23
ok... C is it.. Matts explanation is good...
_________________

vazlkaiye porkalam vazltuthan parkanum.... porkalam maralam porkalthan maruma

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1131
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2006, 22:11
C all the way
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 104
Location: Barcelona
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2006, 10:18
C and nothing else but C.
_________________

...................................................................

Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 57
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Feb 2006, 13:08
B
paraphrase:
Statement:
apply import quotas for copper mined outside the country. this copper is also less expensive. this is to maintain the prices of copper mined inside the country. otherwise the local companies will go out of business
repsonse:
The local cable/wire mfgrers purchase 70% of local mine outputs.
if the purchase price for copper at the intl level is not the same as local price, then their input cost is more and hence their product prices more and hence their sales will drop. and as a result, the demand for US copper (by the local cable/wire companies) will go down.

So the cable.wire mfgrs are supporting the quota, because theya re currently purchasing the local copper which is more expensive than that available internationally. so if the proposal is accepted, then the copper prices are at the same level everywhere and in turn, their own pricing of their product is equal and their sales are steady!

So any options supporting this is the answer: B
All the other 4 answers dont support the copper miners.

(A) is self-serving and irrelevant to the proposal of the mining company
(B) is circular, presupposing what it seeks to prove about the proposal of the mining company
(C) shows that the proposal of the mining company would have a negative effect on the mining companyâ€™s own business
(D) fails to give a reason why the proposal of the mining company should not be put into effect to alleviate the concern of the mining company for staying in business
(E) establishes that even the mining companyâ€™s business will prosper if the mining companyâ€™s proposal is rejected
26 Feb 2006, 13:08
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 11 17 Aug 2009, 07:07
1 Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 2 27 Jun 2009, 07:52
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 4 04 Aug 2008, 10:29
5 Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 7 07 May 2008, 09:58
Statement of a United States copper mining company: Import 5 06 Aug 2007, 04:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by