Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Jun 2016, 02:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Stations X and Y are connected by two separate, straight,

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 417 [0], given: 0

Stations X and Y are connected by two separate, straight, [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 10:19
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Stations X and Y are connected by two separate, straight, parallel rail lines that are 250 miles long. Train P and train Q simultaneously left Station X and Station Y, respectively, and each train traveled to the otherâ€™s point of departure.
The two trains passed each other after traveling for 2 hours. When the two trains passed, which train was nearer to its destination?

(1) At the time when the two trains passed, train P had averaged a speed of 70 miles per hour.

(2) Train Q averaged a speed of 55 miles per hour for the entire trip.
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Posts: 69
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 11:44
Only A is sufficient.

B is not because it qoutes the average speed of Q for the entire journey. We cannot calculate the average speed of B till the trains crossed each other.
VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1440
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 12:16
ssumitsh wrote:
Only A is sufficient.

B is not because it qoutes the average speed of Q for the entire journey. We cannot calculate the average speed of B till the trains crossed each other.

Are we saying that, for a given avg speed, if a different ques asks that how many miles car X wud cover in 2 hrs, we can't ans that ques ??
Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3385
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 237 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 12:24
banerjee

avg speed is given by, total distance over total time, the trains crossed well before the entire journey was over right? so for all we know, train Y went at 200mph for the first 30 minutes and then slowed down to maybe 10 mph for the remainder of the journey, giving an avg speed of 50mph...however, the question asks which train had travelled the furthest when the crossed each other, clearly its the train which had covered the most ground and we cant tell that by avg speed...
VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1440
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 12:31
fresinha12 wrote:
banerjee

avg speed is given by, total distance over total time, the trains crossed well before the entire journey was over right? so for all we know, train Y went at 200mph for the first 30 minutes and then slowed down to maybe 10 mph for the remainder of the journey, giving an avg speed of 50mph...however, the question asks which train had travelled the furthest when the crossed each other, clearly its the train which had covered the most ground and we cant tell that by avg speed...

Not to be a pain....I know what u guys r saying, makes sense.....however, for any other ques where u r given avg speed and asked how many miles wud it cover in 2 hrs......u will just mupltiply speed * time for distance...right? Even here,....u don't really know what was the avg speed for those first 2 hrs ???
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 12:44
If you are given the average speed in a time period, but asked about the total distance in a portion of that time period, you can't solve it.

A nice example is this:

Did John violate the 55mph speed limit?

I. John travelled 100 miles in 2 hours.
II. Somthing else.

I is not sufficient.
Director
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 613
Location: PA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 545 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 16:05
I am gogin with E on this as we do not know at what point did P and Q pass each other

what sis the OA
Director
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 613
Location: PA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 545 [0], given: 22

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 16:17
can you explain how you can get A
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jan 2005, 16:21
Train P drove for 2 hours at average speed of 70, so distance is 140. Total distance is 200. It is closer to its destination. (60 miles away, vs train Q, 140 miles away.)
Intern
Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 04:01
hello
Ans is D.
I think it is the relative speed concept.
When the two trains pass each other it is the
total distance/cumulative avg speed = time
here since in opp directions cumulative forms summation.
So answer has to be D.
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 610
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 09:43
speed * time= distance
70* 2 hrs= 140 ..
i.e 60 miles left..
but we dunno anything abt Q right.. how is it A?
Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 69
Location: san diego
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 19:10
Ok so I am very confused on how you all are getting A.

From the question we know both are traveling a total of 250 miles and that they cross after 2 hours.

I) We know the speed of Train 1 is 70 MPH so from there we can calculate how far that train travled. 140 miles. But we know nothing about the speed of train 2. If train 2's speed was also 70 MPH then, at 2 hours they would cross and they EACH would have travled 140 miles and be equally close to their destination

II) Not sufficent becaues it is the average speed of the whole trip and we have no idea of its speed when they cross.

In combination we still down't know the speed of train 2 when they trains crossed

So I say E..... have we been given the OA, if so... what am i doing wrong here
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 21:54
What do you think "cross" means? That means they were at the same point at the 2 hour point of time. If both trains have travelled 140 miles, considering the total miles (250) they would have crossed each other earlier than 2 hours, don't you think?
Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 69
Location: san diego
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:08
HongHu wrote:
What do you think "cross" means? That means they were at the same point at the 2 hour point of time. If both trains have travelled 140 miles, considering the total miles (250) they would have crossed each other earlier than 2 hours, don't you think?

I have no idea.... that is why i am asking
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:11
Well, "cross" means that they are at one point at the same time. That is what it means. Why are you not sure?
Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2004
Posts: 69
Location: san diego
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:14
No i understand what cross means.... I am just not sure why A is sufficent

unles we are saying based on the distance, and when the trains crossed we can tell how fast the second train was going thus could determine its distance and which was closer.....

Crossed is not what i have an issue with, its how A is sufficent.
Director
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 610
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:17
I agree with thenine. Can somebody pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeaseeeeeee explain..
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:23
Question is "When the two trains passed, which train was nearer to its destination?"

We know that when they passed each other, train P is 140 miles away from its origination and 110 miles (250-140) from its destination. Train Q is 110 miles from its origniation and 140 miles from its destination. So this information is sufficient for us to determine that train P is nearer to its destination.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2243
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2005, 22:30
No problem.
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1218
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 417 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2005, 09:05
I'm sorry for the late OA

The OA is A.

thanks
[#permalink] 23 Jan 2005, 09:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Stations X and Y are connected by two separate, straight,

 post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.