Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 May 2013, 14:25

# stolyar , i am assuming that you did not see my post

Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 781

stolyar , i am assuming that you did not see my post [#permalink]  29 Sep 2003, 21:24
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
stolyar ,

i am assuming that you did not see my post about "successively". The problem had a typo.

A certain number when[b] successively [/b]divided by 8 and 11 leaves remainders of 3 and 7 respectively. What will be remainder when the number is divided by the product of 8 and 11, viz 88?

(1) 3
(2) 21
(3) 59
(4) 68

lets say the integer is N

1. divide by 8
(N-3)/8 = M (some integer )

2. divide M by 11 (successive division according to stem)

[ M - 7]/11
= [((N -3)/8 ) - 7] / 11

= [ (N - 59) / (8 *11)

= (N -59)/88

now lets put it in standard from

(N - 59)/88 = K ( some integer)

N = 88 K + 59

Thus , 59 is the remainder...

agree now?

thanks
praetorian

Last edited by Praetorian on 08 Oct 2003, 00:59, edited 3 times in total.
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 238
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Well the first number that satisfies the conditions is 51. But it's not a choice here so not sure now...
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

N=8n+3
N=11k+7
------------
N=88z+R, in which 0<=R<=87
88z is divisible by 8 and 11; therefore, the remainders of divisions of N by 8 and 11 are equal to the remainders of divisions of R by 8 and 11.

{R=8p+3
{R=11q+7
{0<=R<=87

R=51
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2003
Posts: 262
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

stolyar how do u get R=51 from the equations below:
{R=8p+3
{R=11q+7
{0<=R<=87

One method is trial and error(write all mutiples of 8 & 11 side by side and check), is there any other way...?
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1683
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

I employed this method, but usually there should be a correct answer among options, so we just have to check five numbers, no more, maybe less.
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 781

stolyar wrote:
I employed this method, but usually there should be a correct answer among options, so we just have to check five numbers, no more, maybe less.

When a number is successively divided by two divisors d1 and d2 and two remainders r1 and r2 are obtained, the remainder that will be obtained by the product of d1 and d2 is given by the relation

d1r2 + r1.

Where d1 and d2 are in ascending order respectively and r1 and r2 are their respective remainders when they divide the number.

In this case, the d1 = 8 and d2 = 11. And r1 = 3 and r2 = 7
Therefore, d1r2 + r1 = 8*7 + 3 = 59.

thanks
praetorian

Last edited by Praetorian on 07 Oct 2003, 19:17, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 238
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

But how can 59 be the answer, when:

59 mod 11 = 4
59 mod 88 = 59
?!?!
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3550
Followers: 55

Kudos [?]: 626 [0], given: 781

wonder_gmat wrote:
But how can 59 be the answer, when:

59 mod 11 = 4
59 mod 88 = 59
?!?!

A brilliant guy pointed out that the "successfully " should be "successively"

thanks
praetorian
Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 238
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

praetorian123 wrote:
wonder_gmat wrote:
But how can 59 be the answer, when:

59 mod 11 = 4
59 mod 88 = 59
?!?!

A brilliant guy pointed out that the "successfully " should be "successively"

thanks
praetorian

Makes sense if it's successively.
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
You gotta register to see it, and I won't re-post it here. 18 17 Nov 2003, 10:41
I'm curious, did any of you who already sat for the GMAT see 2 18 Jun 2007, 07:46
I am posting this again as I see two different (OA) 19 14 Aug 2007, 12:26
How would I see my posts ? 2 16 Jul 2010, 00:21
dear all i am working out to see what scaled score you get 4 07 Aug 2011, 06:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by