Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Aug 2014, 01:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Strange one !

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 390 [1] , given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2010, 22:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

66% (02:35) correct 34% (02:03) wrong based on 107 sessions
This one is strange. What do you think guys?

City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects. Because the interest paid to the bond holder is tax-exempt, municipal bonds are an attractive investment. So, to pay for the five state-of-the-art school buildings needed to accommodate our growing student population, Northopolis should issue a ten-year, $200 million bond, thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the likelihood that the bond issue recommended above will have the result that is claimed?
(A) Most Northopolis citizens would be reluctant to support a tax increase to pay for new school buildings.
(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.
(C) Many popular investments are created by pooling state and municipal bonds to create tax-exempt index funds.
(D) Estimates of the cost of five new school buildings vary from well below $200 million to well above $200 million.
(E) A significant percentage of municipal bonds issued by cities such as Northopolis are purchased by investors from other cities who aim to diversify their bond portfolios.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 443
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 112

Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2010, 01:16
1
This post received
KUDOS
nusmavrik wrote:
This one is strange. What do you think guys?

City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects. Because the interest paid to the bond holder is tax-exempt, municipal bonds are an attractive investment. So, to pay for the five state-of-the-art school buildings needed to accommodate our growing student population, Northopolis should issue a ten-year, $200 million bond, thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the likelihood that the bond issue recommended above will have the result that is claimed?
chain of events :
increased tax base by channelising investments in bonds ----> increased tax collections -----> money for building schools
(A) Most Northopolis citizens would be reluctant to support a tax increase to pay for new school buildings.
Distorted facts... possibility of tax increase has not been mentioned .... The plan is to increase the tax base ( i.e. number of people who will be paying the taxes ..

(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.
B -- directly hits the chain : hence correct answer


(C) Many popular investments are created by pooling state and municipal bonds to create tax-exempt index funds.
( irrelevant info ...because we donont know whether these invesments are channelised for social causes like making a school)
(D) Estimates of the cost of five new school buildings vary from well below $200 million to well above $200 million.
we are not concerned about the total cost of the making school as it is immaterial to people who will be investing in the bonds

(E) A significant percentage of municipal bonds issued by cities such as Northopolis are purchased by investors from other cities who aim to diversify their bond portfolios.
( it doesnot matter whether local people or peole from other cities are investing money in bonds ...it will strenghten as you will have more money in the fund )



regards
P S -- must be a question from LSAT or Kaplan
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 47

Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2010, 01:35
1
This post received
KUDOS
Yes it can affect a city's tax revenues but how it's connected with conclusion that bounds might not generate revenue??
3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 226
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 28 [3] , given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2010, 07:52
3
This post received
KUDOS
After a lot of POE, B it is.

The conclusion is:

thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

B said:

bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond

The city hoped to build the schools with a lot of revenues. B points out a reason that the revenues will not be as much as the city expected.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 399
Location: Chicago, IL
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2010, 08:10
1
This post received
KUDOS
nusmavrik wrote:
This one is strange. What do you think guys?

City Council: Cities may issue municipal bonds to fund public projects. Because the interest paid to the bond holder is tax-exempt, municipal bonds are an attractive investment. So, to pay for the five state-of-the-art school buildings needed to accommodate our growing student population, Northopolis should issue a ten-year, $200 million bond, thereby paying for the buildings with revenues from an expanding tax base.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the likelihood that the bond issue recommended above will have the result that is claimed?
(A) Most Northopolis citizens would be reluctant to support a tax increase to pay for new school buildings.
(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.
(C) Many popular investments are created by pooling state and municipal bonds to create tax-exempt index funds.
(D) Estimates of the cost of five new school buildings vary from well below $200 million to well above $200 million.
(E) A significant percentage of municipal bonds issued by cities such as Northopolis are purchased by investors from other cities who aim to diversify their bond portfolios.


Seems like the argument is based on the assumption that a $200 million bond is not significant enough to cause any changes in an expending tax base. However, B states the the possibility that this bond issue can severly affect the city's tax revenues in either positive or negative ways. In case of the latter, A bond issue can even preclude a tax revenue base from expanding making the bond issue really inattractive as a financing alternative.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Dec 2009
Posts: 227
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 3

GMAT Tests User
Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2010, 11:01
1
This post received
KUDOS
(B) Because municipal bond interest is tax-exempt, bond issues can severely affect a city's tax revenues for the life of the bond, despite the short-term benefits.

Because, the interest earned on the municipal bonds is tax-exempt, eventually government is losing that money and causing the tax revenues to decrease.

Hence B for me.
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1563
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 203 [1] , given: 6

Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2010, 11:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
B for me too.
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 513
Location: United States (FL)
Schools: UFL (A)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29
GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35
GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28
GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 247 [0], given: 629

Re: Strange one ! [#permalink] New post 03 Oct 2013, 21:28
This question is from GMAT HACKS daily question of the day archive. I'm not sure when this question originally appeared on Jeff Sackmann's site but it reappeared on March 19, 2013. Here is the link to the question from 2013 http://www.gmathacks.com/daily/20130319-gmat-question-of-the-day.html.

The Official Explanation is as follows:

Answer: B This is a weaken question. The argument makes a rather odd claim. Much of the passage concerns the benefits of municipal bonds, including a suggesting that Northopolis issue such a bond. Then the conclusion is that the city will pay for new school buildings with tax revenues. Money from bond issues is not the same thing, so it's unclear what one has to do with the other. To weaken the argument, that distinction--the assumption that issuing a bond will somehow increase tax revenues--must be made clear. Consider each choice:

(A) This is irrelevant, as it doesn't address either the bond issue or the effect of "reluctance" on tax revenues. (B) This is correct. It relates the existence of the proposed bond issue to tax revenues, which would decrease as a result of the bond issue. (C) This is irrelevant, as it doesn't address tax revenues. (D) Again, this choice is irrelevant; the cost of the buildings is not what the conclusion of the argument is about. (E) This is outside of the scope. If anything, it weakens the argument by suggesting that the bond issue will not have a direct impact on local finances.

NOTE: I added additional Tags to the question as there was only one field used.
_________________

Got Kudos? :) Tis better to give than receive | ANALYSIS OF MOST DIFFICULT QUESTION TYPES
Need motivation? check out this video or this one | "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." - Aristotle
100 HARDEST CR QUESTIONS | 100 HARDEST SC QUESTIONS | 100 HARDEST PS QUESTIONS| 25 HARDEST QUESTIONS | 225 RC PASSAGES W/ TIMER!!!
PS QUESTION DIRECTORY|DS QUESTION DIRECTORY | SC QUESTION DIRECTORY | CR QUESTION DIRECTORY | RC QUESTION DIRECTORY

BEST OVERALL QUANT BOOK FOR THE MONEY | MAXIMIZE YOUR STUDY TIME

Re: Strange one !   [#permalink] 03 Oct 2013, 21:28
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic Strange Profile energyprivateequity 2 28 May 2011, 21:01
Strange Formula TheRob 3 07 Sep 2009, 05:48
STRANGE BUT TRUE!!! bhaarat 6 21 Dec 2006, 17:09
Here`s a strange one.... If y is a positive integer, is 3y GMATT73 20 22 Apr 2006, 22:30
Strange English ywilfred 7 06 Apr 2005, 23:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Strange one !

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.