Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Aug 2016, 05:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Status: All in for MBA
Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 38
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.39
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 34

Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2013, 18:32
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

80% (02:02) correct 20% (01:21) wrong based on 106 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturerâ€™s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I chose A on the following lines.

Scope of the Argument:

1. Investments in Patents
2. Productivity
3. Patent Laws

According to the scopes, options B, C, and D become out of scope. I am unable to choose between A & E.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 2994
Followers: 714

Kudos [?]: 5732 [0], given: 969

Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 03:49
ankit546 wrote:
Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturerâ€™s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I chose A on the following lines.

Scope of the Argument:

1. Investments in Patents
2. Productivity
3. Patent Laws

According to the scopes, options B, C, and D become out of scope. I am unable to choose between A & E.

i do not why you have doubts about A. A is clearly NOT stated in the argument at all. If you dissect the argument

1) Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. to prevent frauds

2) With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. is clear I guess

3) Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturers productivity. something leads to something else. is clear

Hope this helps
_________________
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 647
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 506 [0], given: 23

Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 05:20
ankit546 wrote:
Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturerâ€™s productivity.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I chose A on the following lines.

Scope of the Argument:

1. Investments in Patents
2. Productivity
3. Patent Laws

According to the scopes, options B, C, and D become out of scope. I am unable to choose between A & E.

The scope is incorrectly identified... It's not investment in patents but investment in development of something that could be patented...so there is no role of a financial institution here...hence A is far from a final answer.
you've already shortlisted the correct one,E it is.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 340

Kudos [?]: 1764 [1] , given: 82

Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 09:52
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
ankit546 wrote:
Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer's productivity.

Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I chose A on the following lines.

Scope of the Argument:

1. Investments in Patents
2. Productivity
3. Patent Laws

According to the scopes, options B, C, and D become out of scope. I am unable to choose between A & E.

Hi Ankit,

This is a conclusion question, and the correct answer to a conclusion "Must be True" according to the stimulus. An answer choice for which we have to assume anything extra can be safely eliminated.

The correct answer to these questions could be of two types:

i) Restatement of a premise already mentioned in the stimulus
ii) A logical result of combining tow or more premises

Lets consider both the answer choices A and E

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.

Here you have to make an assumption that the financial institutions are investing in manufacturing companies. In real life this is a common thing but, the manufacturer could also invest its own profits into research and development of new products. This will not benefit financial institution. So this choice will not be "Must be True" based on the stimulus.

If the choice would have been worded as under it would have been correct:

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit manufacturers. --> this must be true as per the passage.

Strict patent laws --> Protect manufacturers

manufacturers protected --> they get encouraged to invest in R&D

Investment in R&D --> increased productivity

Logical conclusion: Strict patent laws --> increased productivity

Now (E)

(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

This choice is a logical conclusion that we derived above. No new assumption has to be made for this to be true. Therefore it "Must be True" based on the premises given in the stimulus.

Hope it helps,
_________________

Current Student
Status: All in for MBA
Joined: 27 Mar 2012
Posts: 38
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.39
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 34

Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2013, 10:55
Vercules wrote:
ankit546 wrote:
Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer's productivity.

Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.
(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.
(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.
(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.
(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

I chose A on the following lines.

Scope of the Argument:

1. Investments in Patents
2. Productivity
3. Patent Laws

According to the scopes, options B, C, and D become out of scope. I am unable to choose between A & E.

Hi Ankit,

This is a conclusion question, and the correct answer to a conclusion "Must be True" according to the stimulus. An answer choice for which we have to assume anything extra can be safely eliminated.

The correct answer to these questions could be of two types:

i) Restatement of a premise already mentioned in the stimulus
ii) A logical result of combining tow or more premises

Lets consider both the answer choices A and E

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.

Here you have to make an assumption that the financial institutions are investing in manufacturing companies. In real life this is a common thing but, the manufacturer could also invest its own profits into research and development of new products. This will not benefit financial institution. So this choice will not be "Must be True" based on the stimulus.

If the choice would have been worded as under it would have been correct:

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit manufacturers. --> this must be true as per the passage.

Strict patent laws --> Protect manufacturers

manufacturers protected --> they get encouraged to invest in R&D

Investment in R&D --> increased productivity

Logical conclusion: Strict patent laws --> increased productivity

Now (E)

(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacturers.

This choice is a logical conclusion that we derived above. No new assumption has to be made for this to be true. Therefore it "Must be True" based on the premises given in the stimulus.

Hope it helps,

Thanks a lot guys.

Hi Vercules,

For the option A, I had taken into consideration that only financial institutions will invest. Now the answer seems much clearer.
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 116
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 48

Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2015, 22:06
Request you to not to post answers/queries/views in question window. This prevents us to analyze the question. The whole purpose of GMAT Club forums is wasted doing so. You have response windows to do all such things.
Re: Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from   [#permalink] 29 Aug 2015, 22:06
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 A new law gives ownership of patents-documents providing 11 19 Jul 2012, 11:02
Intellectual property laws protect patent holders from 12 09 Jul 2010, 12:06
11 A new law gives ownership of patents documents providing 40 03 Jun 2010, 07:12
3 Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from 10 14 Jan 2010, 10:13
A university should not be entitled to patent the inventions 14 26 Oct 2006, 12:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by