Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 08:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3092
Followers: 786

Kudos [?]: 6543 [3] , given: 1012

Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 05:12
3
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

30% (02:37) correct 70% (01:51) wrong based on 1139 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in order to determine whether – and how – to invest more in that film. Many decisions, such as increasing the number of screens that show the film and expanding the marketing campaign, are best made after reaction ca be gathered from audience who actually purchased tickets. Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.
The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of screens and limiting advertising depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.

OA
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Posts: 83
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 200 [0], given: 13

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 06:10
I will go with E.

ohh close but good one missed on this completely, The answer will be A.

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.--this is too strong a statement, if this assumption were to be correct then there would be no point in marketing.
Although it, is strong but it defends the argument.I am at a loss here.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films. --- it just talks about a type of marketing, no relation what so ever with conclusion.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.-irrelevant

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.--This option does not fits in since the argument is about whether to spend in pre-marketing or post-marketing.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.--This seems plausible, fills in the gap that the first weekend is a sure indicator for further investments.
Avantika seems right on this one .Completely missed
_________________

Whatever one does in life is a repetition of what one has done several times in one's life!
If my post was worth it, then i deserve kudos

Last edited by conty911 on 09 Sep 2012, 12:25, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 65
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 14

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 07:17
A
The suggestion is for all releases. So it is assumed that no other way is better
Posted from my mobile device

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 14
GMAT Date: 10-20-2012
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [2] , given: 0

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Sep 2012, 12:10
2
KUDOS
Ans: A.
Also, E is explaining the first statement of the question and not providing with any assumption.
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 11

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2012, 04:26
carcass wrote:
Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in order to determine whether – and how – to invest more in that film. Many decisions, such as increasing the number of screens that show the film and expanding the marketing campaign, are best made after reaction ca be gathered from audience who actually purchased tickets. Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.
The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of screens and limiting advertising depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.

OA after some opinion

Negate option A and the argument falls apart.

+1 A

Thanks,
Ankit
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3092
Followers: 786

Kudos [?]: 6543 [2] , given: 1012

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2013, 03:51
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Sorry. I completely forgot this thread Thanks for PVT

OE

Quote:
The correctanswer choiceeliminates an ALTERNATE PATH TO THE SAME END.
According to the argument, all films should be released conservatively, in order to obtain the
greatest return on marketing investments. The rationale given is that audience reactions can only
be properly gathered and interpreted after the opening weekend; these reactions then serve as the
basis for marketing decisions such as expanding the films release. However, the argument ignores
other possible means to achieve the stated goal of maximum returns onmarketing investments.
Specifically, the argument overlooks the impact of marketing decisions that are made before open-
ing weekend, such as the initial number of screens or the initial size of the advertising campaign;
such decisions could influence the results of the opening weekend. In fact, investing a great deal
in marketing before a film opens might be the best way to generate profits, as in the case of block-
busters or of films predicted to collapse after the opening weekend. Note that several of the incor-
rect answers reinforce a conservative attitude toward releasing a film, but none of them are critical
to the validity of the conclusion, and thus none are assumptions upon which the conclusion
depends.
(A) CORRECT. In order to conclude that all films should have limited releases, it must not be pos-
sible for large pre-release marketing spending to lead to the best returns on investment, no mat-
ter what film is considered. Also, check the LEN: large marketing investments made before the
opening weekerid could eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.
The author's conclusion would fall apart if this were true.
(B) If marketing costs fell, then releasing films might be less risky. However, the conclusion here is
concerned with how to maximize profits. This choice does not address whether a conservative
release plan is the best method to maximize profits.
(C) This is a tempting choice. A premise in the argument says that reactions from commercial
audiences are the most useful indicators in making marketing decisions. Try the LEN strategy:
performance in non-commercial settings is at least somewhat correlated with how the general
public tends to react. Does this destroy the conclusion? No. The non-commercial audience
reactions could be decendy correlated without being the most useful type of audience
reaction.
(D) The author claims that limited releases are the best means to maximize returns on marketing
investments. In other words, the author is predicting something about the expected return on a
marketing investment. At the same time, the author's conclusion does not logically depend on
whether marketing investments have predictable effects or not.
(E) The opening weekend's results may be a strong indicator of future performance, but that does
not allow us to conclude that the given plan will always result in the best financial returns on a
marketing investment. There may be other, better indicators of future performance.

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 367
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 119 [1] , given: 291

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2013, 05:04
1
KUDOS
The key word here are the words 'greater profits' used in A. Once again, I will fixate the importance of reading the entire sentence carefully.
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Posts: 67
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 131

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2014, 22:28
carcass wrote:
Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in order to determine whether – and how – to invest more in that film. Many decisions, such as increasing the number of screens that show the film and expanding the marketing campaign, are best made after reaction ca be gathered from audience who actually purchased tickets. Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.
The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of screens and limiting advertising depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.

OA

B,C,D looks irrelevant E is the restatement of the premise.Hence A
Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 22:19
Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in
order to determine whether-and how-to invest more in that film, Many decisions,
such as increasing the number of screens that show the film' and··expanding
the marketing campaign, are best made after reactions can be gathered from audiences
who actually purchased tickets. Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing
investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small ,number
of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.

The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of
screens and limiting advertising depends upon which of the following assumptions?

(A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually
yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.

(B) New advertising techniques, such as Web-based viral marketing, have not substantially
reduced the average marketing costs for films.

(C) A film's prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not
well correlated with how the general public tends to react to that film.

(D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual
financial returns of films in predictable ways.

(E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the
film's financial performance over its lifetime.

Can someone please explain why answer choice (A) is correct even when the extreme word 'never' is used ?
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 87

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 61

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 22:52
Quote:
Can someone please explain why answer choice (A) is correct even when the extreme word 'never' is used ?

when u are posting ur doubts, it is always courteous to hide the answers!!
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 87

Kudos [?]: 242 [0], given: 61

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 23:00
Quote:
Can someone please explain why answer choice (A) is correct even when the extreme word 'never' is used ?

A is correct to use "never" because the conclusion itself is using an extreme words -----> conclusion is: Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small,number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.
Senior Manager
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 356
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Followers: 69

Kudos [?]: 309 [4] , given: 5

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2014, 23:30
4
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hello Shriti,
A quick tip regarding CR questions.
When it concerns questions that require understanding the assumptions of an argument (Weaken, Strengthen, Assumption) the correct response CAN use words such as "Never", "none", "Most" or "only".

Remember an assumption CAN be an Extreme - exclusionary perspective. NEVER eliminate an option in an assumption based question just because it uses the extreme words.

There is One question type though where you SHOULD watch out with options with extreme / exclusionary words.
That's the inference questions that require you to make an inference based on the data provided. Here option with extreme words are generally wrong!

Hope that clarifies things

Ajeeth Peo
Verbal Trainer - CrackVerbal
_________________

For 5 common traps on CR check here :
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/gmat-critical-reasoning

For sentence correction videos check here -
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/gmat-sentence-correction

Learn all PS and DS strategies here-
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/mastering-quant-on-gmat

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3092
Followers: 786

Kudos [?]: 6543 [0], given: 1012

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 03:51
Merged similar topic. ironcally enough this question was poste by myself

Follow the search butto beforee to post a question. Follow the forum rules

Thank you
_________________
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 544
Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT 1: 0 Q47 V29
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 390 [0], given: 606

Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 06:46
Edited the post to refine the explanation.
Regards.

Conclusion:
to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.

Why?

Premise:
Many decisions, such as increasing the number of screens that show the film and expanding the marketing campaign, are best made after reaction can be gathered from audience who actually purchased tickets.

The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of screens and limiting advertising depends on which of the following assumptions?
B and C are irrelevant.
To me A & D are close but A wins.

Argument is about when to make investment.Lets start from E and D and then we will come to A.

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.
Negation:A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.
If that is true then it impacts the conclusion to limit the screening and initial budget.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.
>>
#1: We are concerned abt when to invest.This option doesn't mentions that.
#2: Even if there is predictable behavior, does it affect conlusion. We dont know as argument doesnt mention any detail to evaluate that.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.
>> Marked items make the option vulnerable to doubt. Even if its not a strong indicator may be its sufficient to make the final call on investment hence argument doesn't fall.Also lifetime performance is too extreme assumption in regard to make sound investment in starting to gain max profit.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 07:27
It was my first post so sorry for mentioning the answer, i will keep that in mind.Thank you for the explanation it helped a lot.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10538
Followers: 919

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2015, 01:08
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2016, 13:24
I see necessary sufficient logic here....
Necessary condition for maximising investment ? small number of screens and limited advertising budget.

if you want to maximise return on investment, then small number of screens and limited advertising budget

Take contrapositive

if large number of screens or large advertising budget then you will minimise return on investment.

A large advertising budget is sufficient to guarantee minimum return on investment.
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2015
Posts: 21
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: ISB '18, IIMA , IIMB
GPA: 3.53
WE: Engineering (Other)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 8

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2016, 07:26
A and Eare close to becorrect.
Now E onl reiterates what is alreay said in question statement. it is not assumption.So answer is A which is "assumption".
Remaining answers are not correct for obvious reasosns.
Manager
Status: You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 148
Location: India
saurav: suman
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Schools: LBS '19, IESE '19, IE
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 149

Re: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2016, 20:38
carcass wrote:
Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in order to determine whether – and how – to invest more in that film. Many decisions, such as increasing the number of screens that show the film and expanding the marketing campaign, are best made after reaction ca be gathered from audience who actually purchased tickets. Therefore, to maximize returns on their marketing investments, studios should initially release all their films on a small number of screens and with a limited advertising campaign.
The plan to maximize returns by initially releasing films on only a small number of screens and limiting advertising depends on which of the following assumptions?

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments.

B) New advertising technique such as web-based viral marketing, haven’t substantially reduced the average marketing cost for films.

C) A film’s prior performance in noncommercial settings, such as festivals, is not well correlated with how the general public tends to react to than film.

D) Across the movie industry, marketing investments do not influence the eventual financial returns of films in predictable way.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime.

OA

Here option A must be correct
neagte option A
Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend SOMETIMES eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments
from the negated statement we can see the conclusion falls apart hence A is our answer because Conclusion uses "SHOULD".
_________________

You have to have the darkness for the dawn to come.

Give Kudos if you like my post

Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Posts: 51
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 43

Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2016, 10:15
Good Question!
I was between A & E, and finally choose E. However, E is not only a partial restatement of one of the premises, but also an extreme situation (lifetime) . So A is correcT.

My analysis is below...

Argument Structure
Conc: To maximize R on MK investments, release all films on few screens and with a limited Ads.
P1: Executives examine how a film performs on its opening weekend in order to determine whether – and how – to invest + in film.
P2: Many decisions, (Increasing the number and expanding the MKT), are best made after reaction is gathered from audience who purchased tickets.

Pre-thinking
The author is trying to find the find the assumption behind the conclusion that the best way to maximize Returns on MKT investment would be to release all films and real ease them with limited Ads. Then they examine the performance on the opening weekend and decide the strategy to follow to maximize Returns.
In order to find the assumption I will falsify the conclusion:
In which scenario the release of all films on few screen and with a limited Ads won't help to maximize Returns on MK investments? Well, if you could better maximize the return deciding for a different strategy: large investment in MKT before the release.
So the assumption would we the negation of this scenario: Large investment in MKT before the release of film won't maximize returns on MKT investments.

Options B, C, and D are OFS.

A) Large marketing investments made before the opening weekend never eventually yield greater profits than small initial marketing investments. Correct!
Aligned with pre-thinking. If negated, the resulting scenario will break the conclusion apart.

E) How a film performs during its opening weekend is a strong indicator of the film’s financial performance over its lifetime. Incorrect!
This option is a a partial restatement of P1. Also, assuming that a film performance during its opening weekend is an strong indicator of the film's financial performance over its lifetime is too extreme. This unseated premise is not necessary for the conclusion to be true. The basis of the conclusion is an strategy: that studios should release all their films in a small number of screen and with limited campaign in order to maximize profits. So the assumption should be wether this strategy works. For example, perhaps they release all films in a small number of screen and with limited campaign, resulting in an bad financial performance. This outcome was probably because there was not enough time to market the film and lot of people were not aware of it it. So it doesn't mean that this result would be a strong indicator of a failure over the film's lifetime. What if they strongly market the film before the release weekend? More people would be aware, and therefore a lot of people would buy tickets.

Hope it helps!
Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs on   [#permalink] 15 Nov 2016, 10:15

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
18 #Top150 CR: Studio executives carefully examine how a film performs 6 07 Dec 2015, 00:40
13 A major film studio announced the release date of a movie 67 08 Oct 2008, 18:12
A major film studio announced the release date of a movie 8 22 Jan 2009, 11:00
A major film studio announced the release date of a movie 7 29 Dec 2008, 01:59
A major film studio announced the release date of a movie 12 16 Sep 2008, 17:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by