Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

well, they do present some "trick" questions. for ex, in case of a DS question, involving a few variables like a<x<b, etc, everything would look easy except that it wouldn't have mentioned that x is an integer (i hope you get the example). so how is tht different from this? where do we draw the line?

Whenever you see a DS question you may expect the answer to be in form of a value or yes/no.

In the mentioned question, using (1), even if the coin is fair, we can only predict that probability of heads is 1/2 or 5 out of 10 turns. but, the value (1/2) is practically based on large number of coin flips. It may happen that first 10 flips result in to 10 heads or no heads at all.

Thus, (1) is insufficient. (differentiating between the probability and actual results)

Using (2), we get a straight forward answer: heads = 5/8 N so 5/8 of flips were heads.

Whenever you see a DS question you may expect the answer to be in form of a value or yes/no.

In the mentioned question, using (1), even if the coin is fair, we can only predict that probability of heads is 1/2 or 5 out of 10 turns. but, the value (1/2) is practically based on large number of coin flips. It may happen that first 10 flips result in to 10 heads or no heads at all.

Thus, (1) is insufficient. (differentiating between the probability and actual results)

Using (2), we get a straight forward answer: heads = 5/8 N so 5/8 of flips were heads.

Thus, answer is (B)

Regards,

That doesn't exactly answer my question. I know how to solve it, however, the assumption is the coin is fair. If that's not given, then E should be the answer.

In GMAT, you don't need to take any assumption in DS question. In a particular info is required it would be mentioned. Now in this question it doesn't matter whether the coin is unfair, since the choices don't require this assumption.

in (1), we can never tell about no. of heads, in (2), 3/8N are tails so other 5/8 should be heads.

Let me know if this is helpful.

Regards,

synecdoche wrote:

cyberjadugar wrote:

Hi,

Whenever you see a DS question you may expect the answer to be in form of a value or yes/no.

In the mentioned question, using (1), even if the coin is fair, we can only predict that probability of heads is 1/2 or 5 out of 10 turns. but, the value (1/2) is practically based on large number of coin flips. It may happen that first 10 flips result in to 10 heads or no heads at all.

Thus, (1) is insufficient. (differentiating between the probability and actual results)

Using (2), we get a straight forward answer: heads = 5/8 N so 5/8 of flips were heads.

Thus, answer is (B)

Regards,

That doesn't exactly answer my question. I know how to solve it, however, the assumption is the coin is fair. If that's not given, then E should be the answer.

"X flipped a coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N=10 (2) 3/8N came up tails. "

Do you just answer B or do you try to be extra smart and ask whether it's a fair coin? (And hence, answer E)

The GMAT will always make clear whether the coin is fair or not (for example it can be given that the probability of heads is 0.4 and the probability of tails is 0.6). So, you shouldn't worry about that issue.

Having said that, Kaplan also makes it clear in the original question, which is: Susan flipped a fair coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N = 24 (2) The number of flips that came up tails was 3/8*N

Clearly, the first statement is not sufficient. Even though expected number of heads is 12 out of 24 but we don't know how many heads there were actually.

As for the second statement: since 3/8 of the flips came up tails then the remaining 5/8 of the flips must have been heads (provided N>0).

"X flipped a coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N=10 (2) 3/8N came up tails. "

Do you just answer B or do you try to be extra smart and ask whether it's a fair coin? (And hence, answer E)

The GMAT will always make clear whether the coin is fair or not (for example it can be given that the probability of heads is 0.4 and the probability of tails is 0.6). So, you shouldn't worry about that issue.

Having said that, Kaplan also makes it clear in the original question, which is: Susan flipped a fair coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N = 24 (2) The number of flips that came up tails was 3/8*N

Clearly, the first statement is not sufficient. Even though expected number of heads is 12 out of 24 but we don't know how many heads there were actually.

As for the second statement: since 3/8 of the flips came up tails then the remaining 5/8 of the flips must have been heads (provided N>0).

Hope it's clear.

Nice explanation Bunuel, if we assume that this is real GMAT question, and there is no indication that n>0 or it does not equal to 0, should we pick C as answer? _________________

If you found my post useful and/or interesting - you are welcome to give kudos!

"X flipped a coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N=10 (2) 3/8N came up tails. "

Do you just answer B or do you try to be extra smart and ask whether it's a fair coin? (And hence, answer E)

The GMAT will always make clear whether the coin is fair or not (for example it can be given that the probability of heads is 0.4 and the probability of tails is 0.6). So, you shouldn't worry about that issue.

Having said that, Kaplan also makes it clear in the original question, which is: Susan flipped a fair coin N times. What fraction of the flips came up heads? (1) N = 24 (2) The number of flips that came up tails was 3/8*N

Clearly, the first statement is not sufficient. Even though expected number of heads is 12 out of 24 but we don't know how many heads there were actually.

As for the second statement: since 3/8 of the flips came up tails then the remaining 5/8 of the flips must have been heads (provided N>0).

Hope it's clear.

Nice explanation Bunuel, if we assume that this is real GMAT question, and there is no indication that n>0 or it does not equal to 0, should we pick C as answer?

Even though it's quite natural to assume that N must be more than zero, the real question would state it somehow to eliminate this ambiguity. _________________