Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 22:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2005, 12:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.
Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?
(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
(C) She uses the word “valueâ€
_________________

hey ya......

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 795
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2005, 15:32
A seems to be the best choice.

In 1st argument, Susan says 'it is justifiabe if it can lead to cure'
In 2nd argument, Susan still says it's ok eventhough it doesn't lead to any cure.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Oct 2005, 15:49
My money on A too, though I was a bit stuck between A and E!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 233
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 01:06
go E go...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Posts: 102
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 01:22
I would go for E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 460
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR# Experimentation on animals [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 06:02
Very close between A and E. I think the primary difference between the two choices is that A is more of the overall position and E delves into the exact flaw.

Therefore, I am going with E.

Please provide OA and OE

[quote="nakib77"]Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.
Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?
(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
(C) She uses the word “valueâ€
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2005, 13:30
I choose A as my answer choice.
But OA is E.
I don't have OE,
Can u guys explain littel more why did you choose E.
_________________

hey ya......

  [#permalink] 13 Oct 2005, 13:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not goalsnr 22 04 May 2008, 16:00
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not vineetgupta 8 10 Nov 2006, 18:56
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not dwivedys 11 09 Aug 2006, 11:01
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not sperinko 5 06 Aug 2006, 07:44
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not wunderbar03 6 28 Apr 2005, 06:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.