Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Sep 2014, 20:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2006, 18:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.
Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?
(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
(C) She uses the word “valueâ€
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-animal experimentation [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2006, 19:04
[quote="vineetgupta"]Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.
Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?
(A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
(B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
(C) She uses the word “valueâ€
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Nov 2006, 22:55
C
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 51
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 07:04
I choose C because initially Susan said that we can experiment on animals because it can cure diseases (so it's valuable for human being) and in the second she add to this value cleanliness etc, while before she said about another value, so she confuses two different values.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Oct 2005
Posts: 728
Location: Madrid
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 08:15
cute_smiley wrote:
I choose C because initially Susan said that we can experiment on animals because it can cure diseases (so it's valuable for human being) and in the second she add to this value cleanliness etc, while before she said about another value, so she confuses two different values.

Agree it is C
BTW really cute smile)
_________________

IE IMBA 2010

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 372
Schools: Kellogg School of Management
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 3

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 08:30
In the first part of Susan's argument she states that people who oppose experimentation on animals do not value preservation of human life. So this means that the experimentation on animals must preserve human life.

In ther second part she responds to M's question by saying that using cosmetics helps support human values. She has not made any attempt to link parts 1 and 2..so E which states that she fails to explain how supporting human values to preservation of human life looks like the best answer.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 09:05
Thanks guys...the OA is E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 127
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 13:52
Do have an OE for this. I feel like E is a little outside the scope of this argument.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Nov 2006, 20:55
cute_smiley wrote:
I choose C because initially Susan said that we can experiment on animals because it can cure diseases (so it's valuable for human being) and in the second she add to this value cleanliness etc, while before she said about another value, so she confuses two different values.


What you said about "values" is right. But can that usage be a logical flaw?
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

  [#permalink] 11 Nov 2006, 20:55
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not bigfernhead 13 02 Apr 2009, 14:26
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not dwivedys 11 09 Aug 2006, 11:01
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not sperinko 5 06 Aug 2006, 07:44
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not nakib77 6 12 Oct 2005, 12:50
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not ywilfred 7 10 Sep 2005, 04:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.