Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Aug 2016, 11:57
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 541
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-values [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2008, 10:14
comebackkid wrote:
Gixxer stated "She fails to make the connection between the two and her argument falls apart".

He is correct but the omission of evidence cited in E causes the argument to fail the Sufficiency Prinicple of argumentation. However, It does not represent a logical flaw.

The Sufficiency Principle of Argumentation states: "One who presents an argument for or against a position should attempt to provide reasons that are sufficient in number, kind, and weight to support the acceptance of the conclusion."

While it is clear Susan fails on this principle, such failure does not equate to a 'logical flaw' which is precisely what the questions asks.


I think a good lesson to learn is that being good at the GMAT means only one thing....you're good at the GMAT. If you read through any reference materials you'll see that they are teaching you to excel on the GMAT and not in real life. The same thing holds true for grammar and some math concepts. It's best to learn what what the GMAT wants. Thats why it would be way more productive taking a prep course instead of taking a math or verbal class.

This one is actaully an LSAT question and here are multiple threads confirming E

11-t15936?hilit=+animal+experimentation

11-t19808?hilit=+animal+experimentation

11-t21159?hilit=+animal+experimentation
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1366
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 506 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR-values [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2008, 10:35
OA is E
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 64
Schools: Duke '13
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 1

Re: CR-values [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2008, 11:54
Thanks for your input, Gixxer.

Can anyone tell me which LSAT the question appeared?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 158
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 31

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2016, 02:07
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not properly value the preservation of human life. Although animal suffering is unfortunate, it is justifiable if it can lead to cures for human ailments.
Melvin: But much animal experimentation involves testing of ordinary consumer products such as soaps, dyes, and cosmetics.
Susan: These experiments are justifiable on the same grounds, since cleanliness, convenience, and beauty are worthwhile human values deserving of support.

Which of the following is the best statement of the logical flaw in Susan’s argument?

A) Her claim that animal experimentation is justifiable if it supports human values contradicts her claim that such experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments.
This option distorts what Susan says. She does not claim that "animal experimentation is justifiable only if it leads to cures for human ailments".
B) She places a higher value on human cleanliness, convenience, and beauty than she does on the preservation of animal life.
Even if this was the case, why would it be a logical flaw? It would just be her opinion.
C) She uses the word “value” in two different senses.
These two uses of the word "value" are not incompatible between each other. Indeed, they are related to each other.
Furthermore, as long as she reasons her argument, she can use as many acceptions of the word "value" as she wants and her argument will still be logical.

D) She assumes that all ordinary consumer products aid in the preservation of human life.
This option also distorts what Susan says. She does not assume that all consumer products aid in the preservation of human life.
E) She fails to show how mere support for human values actually preserves human lives.
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not   [#permalink] 19 Aug 2016, 02:07

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Q. Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not apramanik 2 30 May 2009, 04:12
1 Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not bigfernhead 14 02 Apr 2009, 15:26
1 Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not prasun84 6 14 Nov 2008, 04:30
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not sidbidus 4 18 Jun 2007, 18:58
Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not vineetgupta 8 10 Nov 2006, 19:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Susan: Those who oppose experimentation on animals do not

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.