Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 17:57

Going on right now!

Live Q&A Session with HKU Admissions Team | Join the chat room to participate.


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic:

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 15

GMAT ToolKit User
Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2011, 06:43
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: Are we detecting a greenhouse effect, and related to this, is it exacerbated by "homogenic factors," i.e., human actions? Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?

Within scientific communities and associated scientifically informed circles, the answers have to be somewhat more ambiguous, particularly when rigorous questions concerning evidence are raised. Were scientific truth to be a matter of consensus, and some argue that scientific truth often turns out to be just that, then it is clear that there is beginning to be a kind of majority consensus among many earth science practitioners that the temperature of the Earth, particularly of the oceans, is indeed rising and that this is a crucial indicator for a possible greenhouse effect.

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere. And the fact of the matter is that "whole earth measurements" are still rare and primitive in the simple sense that we simply do not have enough thermometers out. Secondly, even if we had enough thermometers, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years. Thirdly, even if we know that the earth is now heating up, has an ever increasing ozone hole, and from this strange weather effects can be predicted, how much of this is due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like? Is it really the case, as Science magazine claimed in l990, "24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin"?
17. In this passage the author is primarily interested in
(A) Whether scientific truths are simply a matter of consensus
(B) Determining how well established the greenhouse effect is and to what degree it is worsened by human actions
(C) Whether the hot spot El Niño is balanced elsewhere by cold spots
(D) Determining if most scientists would be inclined to give a positive answer to the question of whether there is a greenhouse effect and if it is worsened by human actions
(E) Making a simple synchronic whole earth measurement more than a blip in the diachronic history of Ice Age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


18. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the greenhouse effect?
(A) 24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin.
(B) There is a greenhouse effect that is exacerbated by homogenic factors.
(C) The ozone hole is increasing due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like.
(D) One can determine if mean oceanic temperatures have risen globally in the last several decades only if measurements of ocean temperatures are precise.
(E) Hot spots, such as the El Niño cycle, should not be counted as a factor in the greenhouse effect.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


19. It can be inferred from the passage that
(A) We cannot be certain that strange weather effects are a result of the earth heating up and an ever-increasing ozone hole.
(B) The greenhouse effect is the most widely discussed topic in the scientifically informed circles.
(C) If the temperature of the oceans has ceased to rise at an ever-increasing rate, then the rate of global warming has increased.
(D) Strange weather effects have been shown to be due to the diachronic effects of hydrocarbon burning and not to increases in CFC.
(E) Strange weather effects are caused by the increase use of CFCs, CO2, and similar gasses.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


20. The author’s claim that, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years would be strengthened if the author
(A) Indicated the minimum number of thermometers necessary for a whole earth measurement.
(B) Described the factors that precipitated the start of a new ice age.
(C) Compare synchronic whole earth measurements with diachronic whole earth measurements.
(D) Proved that the mean number of years required to detect significant changes in weather patterns is greater than thirty.
(E) Specified the exact location and quantity of thermometers placed by scientists around the globe.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Operations (Non-Profit and Government)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 2

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2011, 12:21
17 B
18 E
19 C
20 B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 182
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 118

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2011, 01:50
17 B
18 D
19 A
20 D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2011, 05:43
17.B
18.E
19.A
20.D

OA's please.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 15

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2011, 05:51
You can see the OA below. nikhilsrl hit all correct

17 B
18 D
19 A
20 D
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Happy to join ROSS!
Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Posts: 279
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Ross '14 (M)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 48

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 14 Feb 2011, 22:57
Gents,
I am struggling to chose between 18D/18E. Reading this part:

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere.

IMHO, against 18D we have the fact that the text mentions 'accuracy not only for samples, but for the whole Earth'
And against 18E we have strong 'should not' in the answer choice...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 201
Concentration: Real Estate, Finance
Schools: MIT (Sloan) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 501 [0], given: 70

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 18 Feb 2011, 08:53
17 B
18 E
19 A
20 D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2010
Posts: 94
Location: india
WE 1: 1.3
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 15

Reviews Badge
Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2011, 09:53
17-b
18-d
19-a
20-d
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 182
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 118

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 20 Feb 2011, 22:03
Hello Vorskl,

This is my take on 18.

As per the passage para 3 - "Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere". So the author does not say that Hot spots should not be counted, rather it should not be counted by itself, we should also consider other cold spots. For this reason we can cancel 18 E.

As per the passage para 3 - "Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth.". So this supports 18 D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 27 Feb 2011, 18:37
B
D
C
D

OA please...
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 16
GMAT 1: Q V0
GMAT 2: Q V0
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2011, 23:58
I don't understand the logic in the 17th OA. The author states that there is no firm evidence to prove that there is a greenhouse effect, doesn't he?
I picked D for 17th.
So can anyone help me solve this particular question?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Greenhouse effect RC [#permalink] New post 05 Apr 2011, 06:27
MitSuRuGi wrote:
I don't understand the logic in the 17th OA. The author states that there is no firm evidence to prove that there is a greenhouse effect, doesn't he?
I picked D for 17th.
So can anyone help me solve this particular question?


I think the author already mention "Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?"

The author is not determining.
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1748
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 192 [1] , given: 299

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: [#permalink] New post 16 Oct 2013, 11:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
craky wrote:
Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic: Are we detecting a greenhouse effect, and related to this, is it exacerbated by "homogenic factors," i.e., human actions? Most would be inclined to give a positive answer to both of these questions. But, if pushed, what would be the evidence, and how well grounded would it be for such affirmations?

Within scientific communities and associated scientifically informed circles, the answers have to be somewhat more ambiguous, particularly when rigorous questions concerning evidence are raised. Were scientific truth to be a matter of consensus, and some argue that scientific truth often turns out to be just that, then it is clear that there is beginning to be a kind of majority consensus among many earth science practitioners that the temperature of the Earth, particularly of the oceans, is indeed rising and that this is a crucial indicator for a possible greenhouse effect.

Most of these scientists admit that the mean oceanic temperature has risen globally in the last several decades. But this generalization depends upon how accurate measurements may be, not just for samples, but also for the whole Earth. Hot spots, for example the now four year old hot spot near New Guinea which is part of the El Niño cycle, does not count by itself because it might be balanced by cold spots elsewhere. And the fact of the matter is that "whole earth measurements" are still rare and primitive in the simple sense that we simply do not have enough thermometers out. Secondly, even if we had enough thermometers, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years. Thirdly, even if we know that the earth is now heating up, has an ever increasing ozone hole, and from this strange weather effects can be predicted, how much of this is due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like? Is it really the case, as Science magazine claimed in l990, "24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin"?
17. In this passage the author is primarily interested in
(A) Whether scientific truths are simply a matter of consensus
(B) Determining how well established the greenhouse effect is and to what degree it is worsened by human actions
(C) Whether the hot spot El Niño is balanced elsewhere by cold spots
(D) Determining if most scientists would be inclined to give a positive answer to the question of whether there is a greenhouse effect and if it is worsened by human actions
(E) Making a simple synchronic whole earth measurement more than a blip in the diachronic history of Ice Age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
B


18. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the greenhouse effect?
(A) 24% of greenhouse encouraging gases are of homogenic origin.
(B) There is a greenhouse effect that is exacerbated by homogenic factors.
(C) The ozone hole is increasing due to homogenic factors, such as CFCs, CO2 increases, hydrocarbon burning, and the like.
(D) One can determine if mean oceanic temperatures have risen globally in the last several decades only if measurements of ocean temperatures are precise.
(E) Hot spots, such as the El Niño cycle, should not be counted as a factor in the greenhouse effect.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


19. It can be inferred from the passage that
(A) We cannot be certain that strange weather effects are a result of the earth heating up and an ever-increasing ozone hole.
(B) The greenhouse effect is the most widely discussed topic in the scientifically informed circles.
(C) If the temperature of the oceans has ceased to rise at an ever-increasing rate, then the rate of global warming has increased.
(D) Strange weather effects have been shown to be due to the diachronic effects of hydrocarbon burning and not to increases in CFC.
(E) Strange weather effects are caused by the increase use of CFCs, CO2, and similar gasses.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A


20. The author’s claim that, a simply synchronic whole earth measurement over three decades is but a blip in the diachronic history of ice age cycles over the last tens of thousands of years would be strengthened if the author
(A) Indicated the minimum number of thermometers necessary for a whole earth measurement.
(B) Described the factors that precipitated the start of a new ice age.
(C) Compare synchronic whole earth measurements with diachronic whole earth measurements.
(D) Proved that the mean number of years required to detect significant changes in weather patterns is greater than thirty.
(E) Specified the exact location and quantity of thermometers placed by scientists around the globe.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D



Was between 1 B and 1D and picked the wrong one
Also was between 4 A and 4D and again picked the wrong one.

Gees, could someone please share some thoughts on why I messed up?
Will throw some Kudos out there for a nice explanation
Thanks
Cheers,
J :)
Re: Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic:   [#permalink] 16 Oct 2013, 11:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous ardk 1 06 Jul 2011, 08:09
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous garimavyas 1 12 May 2011, 23:22
1 Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous vineetgupta 24 04 Dec 2006, 11:43
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous jyotsnasarabu 12 12 Nov 2006, 09:22
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous faifai0714 10 10 Oct 2006, 17:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Take a very commonplace, often discussed and critical topic:

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.