Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Apr 2014, 01:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 379
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2006, 16:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

51% (02:34) correct 48% (01:35) wrong based on 81 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:


Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.


Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 09:26, edited 2 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1419
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2006, 18:06
I would say D... the argument isn't about the leather, but about the waste the results from the process

A cost comparison is important
B switching equipment is important
C regulations of the new waste type are important
D out
E chemical properties of both are important to consider
Director
Director
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 587
Location: Munich,Germany
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : Tanco [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2006, 18:25
freetheking wrote:
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?


OA later~ :?


C for me.

A -matters because if the cost of using pottasium chloride is higher than salt , then its going to have a higher impact on profits
B- important, because if the equipment is not suitable then the company has to purchase new equipment
D-if the leather quality does not match then it could impact sales
E -could again impact leather quality which would affect sales

C- because it talks about regulations with respect to the by-product of pottasium and not pottasium itself. Had there been concern of environmental regulations about using pottasium then it could be possible that the company might have to spend additional amounts to meet those regulations.
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2924
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2006, 18:47
C

A. cost of salt vs KCl (Chemical formula of potassium chloride :wink: :wink: ) is improtant to gauge the profit
B. Quantity of salt vs KCl is improtant to gauge the profit
D. Quality of leather produced using salt vs KCl is improtant to gauge the profit
E. Chemical properties of salt vs KCl are improtant for the quality of leather
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 474
Location: united states
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Jul 2006, 19:15
C for me as well.. as explained by shahnandan and ps_dahiya.
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 246
Location: Italy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : Tanco [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 04:27
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
has to be considered in order to not affect profits

B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride? we should consider this one

C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride? is the one left out so this is my answear

D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used? also this one need to be considered

E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so? has to be assumed we do not whant changements
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 379
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Jul 2006, 17:59
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so

Are we talking about chemical properties??
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

SVP
SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2006, 23:10
Will go with E .

The quality of leather, reuse of existing machines, constrsints on waste disposal and cost of using a different chemical all have some bearing onthe profits of the company.

The chemical properties involved need not be the same.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 379
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2006, 23:11
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

:done
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 332
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2006, 12:35
freetheking wrote:
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

:done


At first, felt that D is better.. Closer evaluation gives E..
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 115
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 Jul 2006, 09:55
E.
Easy pesy
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2011, 06:21
Yeah, E seems quite obvious, but why others are wrong, could you explain me?

Because when doing CR, we can't risk of targeting one answer is 100% correct, we need to cancel others in order to make sure the targeted answer is right, don't you think?

The correct answer is E, but why others are wrong???



freetheking wrote:
OA is E
IMO, chemical properties doesn't matter in this case.

:done
2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Posts: 65
Location: Korea, Republic of
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 08-16-2012
GPA: 3.05
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [2] , given: 36

GMAT Tests User
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink] New post 30 Apr 2012, 17:05
2
This post received
KUDOS
Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?

I don't understand the OA.

If chemical properties are considered 'out of topic', isn't 'equipment' from (B) considered 'out of topic' as well?
If Potasium chloride's chemical properties don't work as effective as a common salt, wouldn't that decrease the profit? Because pottasium is not effective, the company should purchase more potassium?

Please help..
_________________

Luck is the additional surplus on the way to one's constant effort.

Director
Director
Status:
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 525
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 54

Kudos [?]: 232 [0], given: 9

Re: CR , but except [#permalink] New post 30 Apr 2012, 23:30
uledssul,

The equipment from option (B) is relevant - it is important for the firm to determine if the equipment that they have been using with common salt will also work with potassium chloride. If it does not, then the company will have to spend more in fixing/upgrading/replacing the equipment.

On the other hand, for option (E), the similarity of the chemical properties that make potassium chloride effective with those that make common salt effective are irrelevant - what matters is whether those properties do the job, i.e. preserve animal hides. As long as this is being done, that is all that the manufacturer will care about.

The answer is therefore (E).
_________________

Free profile evaluation by top b-school alumni: email us at info@gyanone.com
Personalized 1-on-1 GMAT coaching: www.gyanone.com/1-on-1-gmat/

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 7

Re: [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2013, 11:54
when i went through this question none of the answers seemed correct.

for the OA correct answer E i would contest that it "WOULD" be important to look into the chemical properties because if KCl somewhere down the line caused corrosion or ruined the leather product the companies will end up having to refund the customers money which will end up costing them money had they not looked into this issue to begin with.

xsports wrote:
E.
Easy pesy

Last edited by Narenn on 06 Oct 2013, 09:49, edited 1 time in total.
All similar threads have been merged.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Posts: 402
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 81

GMAT Tests User CAT Tests
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2014, 00:32
freetheking wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:


Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?


I think E is not correct..becase question stem is asking that..what wud "impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt"

so company shd luk chemical properties because if there wud be any difference in properties to preserve animal hides b/w potasium chloride and salt it may effect the qulity of leather?

anyone will clear my doubt?
_________________

Bole So Nehal.. Sat Siri Akal.. Waheguru ji help me to get 700+ score !

Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Nov 2013
Posts: 37
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 6

Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2014, 11:16
sanjoo wrote:
freetheking wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 54
Page: 138
Difficulty:


Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides. New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt. Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:

A. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
B. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
C. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
D. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
E. Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so?


I think E is not correct..becase question stem is asking that..what wud "impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt"

so company shd luk chemical properties because if there wud be any difference in properties to preserve animal hides b/w potasium chloride and salt it may effect the qulity of leather?

anyone will clear my doubt?

You are thinking too much !!! Chemical properties and quality have no connection !! It is possible to create a good quality product using different material. so E is quite broad and irrelevant. Just a tip in CR just answer from what is given !! NEVER make additional assumptions and connections ;) Hope i was able to make it clear .
Re: Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of   [#permalink] 28 Feb 2014, 11:16
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Though now eaten in large quantities around the world and Puilunchristin 7 19 Jan 2006, 17:54
New posts Though now eaten in large quantities around the world and haas_mba07 3 08 Sep 2006, 05:06
New posts 3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Textile products such as Italian shoes and leather in the US AtifS 7 16 Mar 2010, 23:46
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies. New Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of uledssul 0 30 Apr 2012, 23:30
New posts 1 The conventional process for tanning leather uses large lMarial 2 22 Nov 2013, 12:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.