Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 09:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 279 [4] , given: 2

Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2010, 04:57
4
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

30% (02:38) correct 70% (02:10) wrong based on 9 sessions
Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources they quote stake their professional reputations on what may be called the logic of anecdotes. This is so because the statements reported by such journalists are dissociated from the precise circumstances in which they were made and thus will be accepted for publication only if the statements are high in plausibility or originality or interest to a given audience—precisely the properties of a good anecdote.
Student: But what you are saying, then, is that the journalist need not bother with sources in the first place. Surely, any reasonably resourceful journalist can invent plausible, original, or interesting stories faster than they can be obtained from unidentified sources.

1.The student’s response contains which one of the following reasoning flaws?
(A) confusing a marginal journalistic practice with the primary work done by journalists
(B) ignoring the possibility that the teacher regards as a prerequisite for the publication of an unattributed statement that the statement have actually been made
(C) confusing the characteristics of reported statements with the characteristics of the situations in which the statements were made
(D) judging the merits of the teacher’s position solely by the most extreme case to which the position applies
(E) falsely concluding that if three criteria, met jointly, assure an outcome, then each criterion, met individually, also assures that outcome

2. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the teacher’s argument?
(A) A journalist undermines his or her own professional standing by submitting for publication statements that, not being attributed to a named source, are rejected for being implausible, unoriginal, or dull.
(B) Statements that are attributed to a fully identified source make up the majority of reported statements included by journalists in stories submitted for publication.
(C) Reported statements that are highly original will often seem implausible unless submitted by a journalist who is known for solid, reliable work.
(D) Reputable journalists sometimes do not conceal the identity of their sources from their publishers but insist that the identity of those sources be concealed from the public.
(E) Journalists who have special access to sources whose identity they must conceal are greatly valued by their publishers.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 04 Jun 2010, 09:30
IMO, 1B and 2B.

Tough questions.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 6

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 07 Jun 2010, 10:39
these seem like LSAT CRs (terrifying)

i nervously picked D and A
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2010, 07:56
No idea abt the ans .. can some1 pls post the OA ..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 16

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 08 Jun 2010, 10:11
IMO B and A
_________________

Never give up,,,

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 01 Jul 2010, 09:03
i chose A and A. Noboru please post OA. Very tough and interesting questions.. +1 to u
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Posts: 18
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 03:37
IMO C
what is OA?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 2

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 05:31
That was tough! Spent a good 5 mins and came up with B and A. I am pretty sure abt the first one, but I guessed A over B in the second one.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 2

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 12:22
OA is B and A.
Congrats to mirzohidjon and anandnat.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

2 KUDOS received
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 75
Location: Toronto
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 106 [2] , given: 2

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 19:58
2
This post received
KUDOS
received a pm.

Definitely a head-scratcher!

Question 1:

The teacher is basically telling the student: "if you want to conceal the identity of your source, then the content of the source's claims (ie, the source's story) better be good (ie, plausible and original)--otherwise it won't get published."

The student counters with "well, if that's the case, then why do I even need to bother with a source. why can't I just make stuff up?"

How would the teacher respond in real life? Obviously, the teacher would say "yeah, but that's not what we're talking about here. If you want to talk about 'making stuff up', that's a whole different issue." In other words, the teacher was framing the discussion under what he thought was the shared understanding that "making stuff up" wasn't a valid option for the reporter. The student fails to realize the teacher's intent. So, for question 1, choice B correctly points this out.

---

Question 2:

The teacher is arguing that stories involving stories involving sources whose identities are concealed are accepted for publication only if they are highly plausible and original. Therefore, his argument also amounts to a prescription to enterprising journalist students: if you want to conceal the identify of your source, your story better be plausible and original.

Choice A tells us that journalists' reputation is damaged when they submit for publication stories involving sources whose identities are concealed. Thus, choice A lends merit to the teacher's position.
_________________

Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!

Image

Kaplan Reviews

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [1] , given: 13

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 22:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
In question 2, the correct answer choice precisely paraphrases the very first sentence of the teacher's argument - that the journalists "stake" their reputation when they resort to the practice mentioned in the passage. It's a long convoluted statement: A journalist undermines his or her own professional standing by submitting for publication statements that, not being attributed to a named source, "are rejected" for being implausible, unoriginal, or dull; the real heart of the argument becomes apparent when you hit the phrase "are rejected" because that's when the reputation is staked - and which is what the teacher states originally that journalists "stake" their reputatoin when they do submit articles without naming the source and the articles are rejected unless they are creative etc... - simply submitting the article without a named source that gets accepted somehow (that is fails the creative scrutiny that typically accompanies such submissions) despite not being "anecdotal" is not so much of a big deal - but when it gets rejected for being implausible etc then it does become a big deal.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jun 2010
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 2

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 02 Jul 2010, 23:19
Thanks Dwivedys and Testluv! Though I got Q2 right, i still have a few questions:

1. Is A saying that despite providing plausible, original and timely quotes, it still is considered dull and uninteresting and hence "rejected" because it is not attributed to a source? If this is the case, then it contradicts the second part of the original statement that some quotes too get published despite the source. If not, then it simply is rephrasing the first part of the original statement and hence I don't feel its necessarily adding (or strengthening) the teacher's stand.

2. Could you please explain why B is wrong? I feel B is definitely adding (and strengthening) to the original statement as it is providing some info that is not present in the original statement.

Lastly, yes, I say all this despite choosing A :)
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2010, 00:06
anandnat wrote:
Thanks Dwivedys and Testluv! Though I got Q2 right, i still have a few questions:

1. Is A saying that despite providing plausible, original and timely quotes, it still is considered dull and uninteresting and hence "rejected" because it is not attributed to a source? No it is saying that there is a possibility that it might get rejected in which case the journalists' reputations would be staked. If this is the case, then it contradicts the second part of the original statement that some quotes too get published despite the source. If not, then it simply is rephrasing the first part of the original statement and hence I don't feel its necessarily adding (or strengthening) the teacher's stand.

2. Could you please explain why B is wrong? I feel B is definitely adding (and strengthening) to the original statement as it is providing some info that is not present in the original statement. Just because many instances are accompanied by appropriate quotes does nothing to alter the stance of the teacher - still there may be instances where source is not cited and hence the original situation - viz. reputation being at stake holds.

Lastly, yes, I say all this despite choosing A :)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 334
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 7

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2010, 01:32
B and A it is....head scratcher definitely!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 443
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 112

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2010, 07:48
read the explanation twice !! :)
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 24

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!) [#permalink] New post 09 Sep 2010, 01:29
tough one!! Still a bit confused :?
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TheLaptopSkinVault
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/LaptopSkinVault

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Re: Journalists who conceal (Impossible!!!!)   [#permalink] 09 Sep 2010, 01:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources tenaman10 4 06 Jun 2009, 22:31
School children who are punished by their teachers for not stolyar 11 01 Oct 2007, 05:04
Most lecturers who are effective teachers are eccentric, but ronybtl 7 01 Nov 2005, 16:24
According to the school's principal, no teacher who refuses Pauline 7 30 Jul 2005, 02:10
Questions 17-18 Teacher: Journalists who conceal the WinWinMBA 7 16 Jun 2005, 15:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.