Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Apr 2014, 23:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2011, 13:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

100% (01:48) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 8 sessions
Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.


Hi,

I read a few forums on this question but yet haven't found a reason why A is wrong and C is better. Is the issue with the word "Dramatically" cause I can easily come up with many reasons to dispute C too.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Status: In Mexico.... NO PM's :-)
Affiliations: UA-1K, SPG-G, HH-D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 11818
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 1983

Kudos [?]: 6414 [0], given: 3565

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR Question [#permalink] New post 16 Jul 2011, 18:54
Expert's post
Discussed many times: technological-improvements-and-reduced-equipment-82828.html

Please post more descriptive subject!
_________________

Founder of GMAT Club

Just starting out with GMAT? Start here... | Want to know your GMAT Score? Try GMAT Score Estimator
Need GMAT Book Recommendations? Best GMAT Books

Co-author of the GMAT Club tests

Have a blog? Feature it on GMAT Club!

Re: CR Question   [#permalink] 16 Jul 2011, 18:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have OlegC 5 12 Jul 2004, 07:22
New posts Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have kimmyg 6 13 Sep 2005, 04:33
Popular new posts 5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have cool_jonny009 11 16 Feb 2006, 20:28
Popular new posts Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have mailtheguru 10 30 Jul 2006, 11:59
Popular new posts 3 Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have lexis 15 08 May 2008, 11:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.