Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Jul 2014, 13:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 02:04
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970’s than it did in the 1960’s.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1743
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 02:08
my answer choice is E.
_________________

hey ya......

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 02:25
I agree. E uses occasionally rather ambiguously, nevertheless every other option strengthens the argument.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 02:30
It irritates me at times! OA is B!!!!!!!!!!
I find no logic whatsoever for B to be the OA!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 02:55
How can it be B? B requires the test taker to have some sort of financial background; given that as time passes, the value of the minimum wage in present dollars depreciates in accordance with inflation (amongst other factors...) Thereby, saving the small business owners from paying higher wages to the teenagers. What's the OE on this one?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 03:08
Oh there is no OE for this!! Just an OA!!

I guess I should stop doing from this set...many questions, I was surprised by the OAs!!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 04:07
I go with E too. The fact that the unemployment did dipped once means that it's not just the minimum wage that caused the unemployment rate to go up.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 13:29
I just wrote out a detailed expanation for this but I got timed out...and so I'm going to rewrite this.

Okay, here's another way to approach this problem. Let's look at the conclusion and the premise.

Conclusion: Congress should pass a sub min-wage law to keep teenage unemployment from rising.

Premise: (1) Employers can not afford to hire teenagers. (2) Since the 1960's, teenage unemployment rate has been rising.

Now, we are looking for an answer that will WEAKEN this argument, so anything to the extent that said that the new law will not help teenage unemployment levels from declining will be perfect.

Let's exam the answer choice:

A. supports the conclusion that a min sub wage law is necessary. so, we can eliminate.

B. this works because it goes against the conclusion by saying that teenage unemployment went up even when min wage is constant. If the logic that they use to support this works, then teenage unemployment should not have went up but should have remain constant.

C. Does not work, out of scope.

D. Does not work, 1970's was not mentioned.

E. Occassionally decline is arbitary, it could have increase somewhere down the line.

In all, B makes the strongest argument. Hope this helps...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 15:43
Nice explanation above, I thought B too..it follows there is no relation between salary increase or decrease and unemployment rate...
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 804
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2005, 16:47
B. this works because it goes against the conclusion by saying that teenage unemployment went up even when min wage is constant. If the logic that they use to support this works, then teenage unemployment should not have went up but should have remain constant.

Not clear at all! :oops:
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

  [#permalink] 13 Sep 2005, 16:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the surbab 8 05 Apr 2007, 10:31
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the AK47 6 22 Jan 2007, 21:46
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the iced_tea 11 24 Sep 2006, 11:07
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the rkatl 8 25 Aug 2006, 10:15
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the jpv 9 02 Aug 2005, 18:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.