Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 18:53

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Television executives recently announced that advertising

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Television executives recently announced that advertising [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 13:01
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Television executives recently announced that advertising time on television will cost 10 to 15 percent more next fall than it cost last fall. The executives argued that in spite of this increase, advertisers will continue to profit from television advertising, and so advertising time will be no harder to sell next fall than it was last fall.

Which one of the following, if true, would most support the television executives' arguement?

A) Most costs of production and distribution of products typically advertised on television are expected to rise 3 to 7 percent in the next year
B) The sytem for rating the size of the audience watching any given television advertisement will change next fall
C) Next fall advertising time on telelvision will no longer be available in blocks smaller than 30 seconds
D) The amount of television advertising time purchased by providers of services is increasing.
E) A recent survey has shown that the average number of hours people spend watching television is increasing at the rate of 2 percent every 2 months.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 355
Location: USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 13:34
I feel that only choices C and E seem relevant, and I will choose E.

To solve this CR, we are required to choose the answer choice that best supports the claim that "in spite of this increase, advertisers will continue to profit from television advertising"

Choice A neither supports not weakens the argument made by the TV executives.
Choice B is irrelevant.
Choice D is out, because it does not address the executive's claim.

Choice C - If TV spots less than 30 seconds are not available, then advertiser's will be spending more on ads, and I am not sure, whether the TV executives are referring to this increase in spending. As I am probably making an unstated assumption, lets skip this choice.

Choice E is the safest. If the number of people watching TV is increasing, then it will mean that, advertisers are reaching a larger audience. Thus when compared to last year, an advertiser will be paying a little less per member of the audience next year (despite the increase), when compared to the amount per audience member last year. I did a bit of math, to support my argument.
If there were 100 members watching TV programs last fall, then the rate of increase will result in 126 members watching TV programs, by the start of next fall, when the advertisers are only paying 110 to 115% of what they spent last year.

Thus E.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 13:51
Darth_McDaddy wrote:
I feel that only choices C and E seem relevant, and I will choose E.......Thus E.


E. agree with you...............
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 14:13
E is the best here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 15:00
IMO D is the only choice that has any chance, everything else looks like a long shot.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 Aug 2005, 16:17
The only relevent choices are D and E.

d can be easily refuted. The time is being purchased by service providers, but how are they going to profit from it...The advertisers are spending money but this choice does not show any return over their investment.

E is directlt relevent. E says, the advertisement is reaching more and more poeple who are the consumers... If the population of people watching tv is increasing, so would be the profits of advertisers.

E is my choice.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2005, 05:07
i am hesitant between D & E
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 284
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2005, 19:16
E provide more direct support for the point that more expensive advertisement charges will not deter advertisers to buy air time.
E explains it logically: people are watching more and more TV, therefore, TV ads as a way to reach consumers is become more and more important - thus spending some more on ads is well justified.

In contrast,

D) The amount of television advertising time purchased by providers of services is increasing.

mentions the fact that currently the advertising time is selling well, but we don't know why - it could be a short-time phenomenon that will disapperar before next fall.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2005, 16:05
IMO D again though the answer looks too direct to be right, E assumes just because people watch TV for longer time the advertisers will pay more.
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2005, 09:27
E because increase in the number of viewers implies benefits from
advertising and hence worth to spend more on it
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2005, 17:47
The OA is E. If the AC "A" were paraphrased as follows, wouldnt it strengthen the argument:

The cost of products typically advertised on telelvison are expected to rise 3 to 5% in the next year.

I mis-read AC A as the aforementioned. Do you all think that if AC A was phrased as above it would strenghten the argument [the implicit logic was that the "increase" in cost of advertising is passed on to the consumer via the "increase" in price of product. Therefore advertising time will be no harder to sell next fall than it was last fall]

Let me know what you guys think.

OA is E.

Darth, i dunno if i agree with your math though. 126 > 110 therefore it strengthens.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 04:59
Any thoughts on my comments?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Aug 2005, 21:15
Bump...
  [#permalink] 11 Aug 2005, 21:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 The executive committee of the shopping mall announced sang5650 13 14 Apr 2010, 22:16
The executive committee of the shopping mall announced noboru 23 06 Aug 2009, 06:07
A recent study reveals that television advertising does not vaivish1723 1 30 Jun 2009, 22:46
Television executives recently annonced that advertising joemama142000 7 06 Dec 2005, 01:38
A recent study reveals that television advertising does not eastcoaster9 12 16 Sep 2005, 09:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Television executives recently announced that advertising

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.