Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 May 2016, 14:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Tepper vs Johnson

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2012, 16:03
I have offers from CMU-Tepper and from Cornell-Johnson.

Background:
Engineering

Short term goals:
Operations management (oil and gas)

Long term goals:
Entrepreneurship (oil and gas, construction)

I believe Tepper offers better quality education, especially in operations.
Johnson on the other hand has a very good network and name.

What do you think ?
Director
Status: Go Blue!
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 685
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GRE 1: 336 Q169 V167
GPA: 3.22
WE: Information Technology (Manufacturing)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 249

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2012, 20:04
I'd pick Tepper based on the strength and reputation of their operations concentration.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 51
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 2.42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

04 Jun 2012, 21:54
I think it's important that you think about your long term goals again. If you choose Cornell you will receive that general management experience needed for entrepreneurship and long term network. However, if you choose Tepper then you will have the same quant type engineering education.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

Follow my Blog as I attempt to pay it forward !!!
http://mbatechfinance.tumblr.com/

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 02:53
Tepper is a stronger brand IMO, but not by much.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

VP
Status: Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 1345
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 73

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 04:52
Is there scholarship money on the table? That would tip the scales for me in this case. Overall I think Johnson is the more highly regarded program, but not by leaps and bounds. If I remember correctly when I was researching Johnson I thought I saw an operations concentration. I really don't know much about Tepper, but I know it's a really good program. I think Johnson offers a bit more cache longterm and may have a broader network especially at higher levels of an org (this is just a guess). Where do you feel a better fit? If it's equal between the schools, then I'd likely go to Johnson. I might could be biased though since I am a CU alum. GO BIG RED!!

Posted from my mobile device
_________________

The Brain Dump - From Low GPA to Top MBA (Updated September 1, 2013) - A Few of My Favorite Things--> http://cheetarah1980.blogspot.com

Director
Status: Go Blue!
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 685
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GRE 1: 336 Q169 V167
GPA: 3.22
WE: Information Technology (Manufacturing)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 249

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 08:56
I agree with the sentiments that Johnson is more highly regarded for business in general, however, I think it's important to stress the goal of operations management.

Operations, especially in oil & gas, has a strong pairing affinity with engineering and information systems. Carnegie Mellon is one of the top engineering and computer science universities in the world, and Tepper is one of the top operations schools in the country often sharing the best reputation with MIT Sloan. A lot of operations is pure analytics, and if you know much about corporate analytics, then you know it lives or dies by the strength and quality of information systems. Tepper is one of the rare schools in the country that has an extremely strong information systems concentration available as part of its MBA program.

The biggest operations case competition in the country is hosted at Tepper. Tepper is one of just five North American schools that participates in AT Kearney's Global Prize Competition (3 of the 5 are M7), and there's also a consulting course that works on a real project with AT Kearney.

This is one of those scenarios in which career fit truly trumps an edge card in overall brand.
VP
Status: Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 1345
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 73

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 09:36
method wrote:
I agree with the sentiments that Johnson is more highly regarded for business in general, however, I think it's important to stress the goal of operations management.

Operations, especially in oil & gas, has a strong pairing affinity with engineering and information systems. Carnegie Mellon is one of the top engineering and computer science universities in the world, and Tepper is one of the top operations schools in the country often sharing the best reputation with MIT Sloan. A lot of operations is pure analytics, and if you know much about corporate analytics, then you know it lives or dies by the strength and quality of information systems. Tepper is one of the rare schools in the country that has an extremely strong information systems concentration available as part of its MBA program.

The biggest operations case competition in the country is hosted at Tepper. Tepper is one of just five North American schools that participates in AT Kearney's Global Prize Competition (3 of the 5 are M7), and there's also a consulting course that works on a real project with AT Kearney.

This is one of those scenarios in which career fit truly trumps an edge card in overall brand.

I agree that Tepper is probably the better school for immediate career fit. However, do you think that Johnson might be the better school in the long term? Is this a choice between the school that will prepare you for your post MBA job vs. the school that will prepare you to lead a division or organization 10 years from now? I am not too familiar with Tepper from a general management/leadership curriculum perspective. I know that Johnson has a really robust GM curriculum and is really big on leadership initiatives. Yo no se. I think it's a toss up.
_________________

The Brain Dump - From Low GPA to Top MBA (Updated September 1, 2013) - A Few of My Favorite Things--> http://cheetarah1980.blogspot.com

Director
Status: Go Blue!
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 685
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GRE 1: 336 Q169 V167
GPA: 3.22
WE: Information Technology (Manufacturing)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 249

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 11:16
cheetarah1980 wrote:
I agree that Tepper is probably the better school for immediate career fit. However, do you think that Johnson might be the better school in the long term?

I don't because I believe the foundation for long-term success is laid in the short-term. If I'm hiring for operations, and I take both a Johnson graduate and a Tepper graduate, and it turns out that the Tepper one possesses and displays superior operations management skills, then shouldn't I be more inclined to promote the Tepper graduate over the long-term?

If I was hiring for something highly technical like data-driven marketing, I'd want someone from Booth over HBS. Yes, HBS has the golden reputation, but the person from Booth, assuming they tailored their curriculum to it, would probably run circles around an HBS candidate in short-term job performance. Then when a promotion becomes available, guess who looks better?

The brand card is just not enough. It's not enough in the short-term or the long-term when dealing with specific, technical fields in my opinion.
VP
Status: Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 1345
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Sales (Consumer Products)
Followers: 108

Kudos [?]: 415 [0], given: 73

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 11:27
method wrote:
cheetarah1980 wrote:
I agree that Tepper is probably the better school for immediate career fit. However, do you think that Johnson might be the better school in the long term?

I don't because I believe the foundation for long-term success is laid in the short-term. If I'm hiring for operations, and I take both a Johnson graduate and a Tepper graduate, and it turns out that the Tepper one possesses and displays superior operations management skills, then shouldn't I be more inclined to promote the Tepper graduate over the long-term?

If I was hiring for something highly technical like data-driven marketing, I'd want someone from Booth over HBS. Yes, HBS has the golden reputation, but the person from Booth, assuming they tailored their curriculum to it, would probably run circles around an HBS candidate in short-term job performance. Then when a promotion becomes available, guess who looks better?

The brand card is just not enough. It's not enough in the short-term or the long-term when dealing with specific, technical fields in my opinion.

Oh I totally feel you, but I'm not sure that's always the way things work. I've seen people who are technical wizards get passed by the folks who are proficient yet exude "executive presence" and "leadership potential." Personally, I think those things while important are also kind of nebulous and can be developed over time. But catering to how things often go (not how they should) there's def a reason why those HBS grads have climbed many a ladder on case method alone.* I think this tends to rear its head the most when moving from middle to senior management or executive levels.

*Not saying I agree with it, but IJS
_________________

The Brain Dump - From Low GPA to Top MBA (Updated September 1, 2013) - A Few of My Favorite Things--> http://cheetarah1980.blogspot.com

Director
Status: Go Blue!
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 685
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GMAT 1: 740 Q47 V45
GRE 1: 336 Q169 V167
GPA: 3.22
WE: Information Technology (Manufacturing)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 147 [0], given: 249

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2012, 12:04
cheetarah1980 wrote:
Oh I totally feel you, but I'm not sure that's always the way things work. I've seen people who are technical wizards get passed by the folks who are proficient yet exude "executive presence" and "leadership potential." Personally, I think those things while important are also kind of nebulous and can be developed over time. But catering to how things often go (not how they should) there's def a reason why those HBS grads have climbed many a ladder on case method alone.* I think this tends to rear its head the most when moving from middle to senior management or executive levels.

*Not saying I agree with it, but IJS

Excellent points for consideration for sure.
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2012, 15:06
Thank you all for your replies.

I have an additional question: Do you feel that Cornell students have more of a managerial character than those at Carnegie Mellon ?
Manager
Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Posts: 95
Location: United States (SC)
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: Cornell (Johnson) - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2012, 20:52
MBAEntrepreneurship wrote:
Thank you all for your replies.

I have an additional question: Do you feel that Cornell students have more of a managerial character than those at Carnegie Mellon ?

I don't know if I can answer your question, but as a future Johnson student, I do want to acknowledge that there is a specialized "Semester in Strategic Operations" immersion that ironically I plan on taking. In my opinion it is very robust, but what do I know.

I don't think you can go wrong with either school, but would obviously love to have another Ops guy at Johnson!
VP
Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 1181
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2012
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 408 [0], given: 19

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2012, 07:04
Expert's post
Are either programs strong in oil and gas recruiting? Are any Texas schools on the table for you as well?

IMO, if your long term goal is to start your company in oil and gas/construction, you probably don't need an MBA. You can get business through the oil and gas network. You can get the network either by working in the field, or if go to a school with strong oil & gas connections.
Re: Tepper vs Johnson   [#permalink] 13 Jun 2012, 07:04
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Thoughts: Tepper vs Johnson ($$??) vs Kenan-Flagler ($$$$) 1 05 Apr 2015, 18:46 Johnson vs Tepper vs Mendoza 7 26 Mar 2014, 15:32 23 Fuqua vs Johnson vs Tepper vs Owen vs UNC 24 19 Dec 2013, 14:34 Johnson v Tepper v McCombs 4 16 Dec 2013, 22:09 Tepper VS. Vandy wih$$\$ 5 28 Apr 2012, 07:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by