Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 03:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 13

Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2009, 23:34
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.
Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward’s argument as a response to Teresa’s argument?
(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 849
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 310 [0], given: 106

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2009, 00:03
IMO E...
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Joined: 01 May 2009
Posts: 115
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 11

### Show Tags

26 Jun 2009, 08:03
I will go with option Option D.
Manager
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 172
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2009, 13:19
acer2knight wrote:
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it cannot compete economically with other means of accomplishing the objectives of spaceflight.
Edward: No mode of human transportation has a better record of reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years. Thus manned spaceflight definitely has a positive future.
Which of the following is the best logical evaluation of Edward’s argument as a response to Teresa’s argument?
(A) It cites evidence that, if true, tends to disprove the evidence cited by Teresa in drawing her conclusion.
(B) It indicates a logical gap in the support that Teresa offers for her conclusion.
(C) It raises a consideration that outweighs the argument Teresa makes.
(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other

What was cut out in the answer (E)? Can you recopy & repaste?

I think (D) is the best choice. E & C are runner ups.
Manager
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 108
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2009, 14:46
I'm with D.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2009
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2009, 14:22
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2009, 04:58
(E) It fails to respond to Teresa’s argument because it does not address the fundamental issue of whether space activities should have priority over other claims on the national budget

is the complete choice E
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2009, 05:00
OA is D.

(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.

Theresa was talking about the cost incurred and she doesnt refer to anything to do with transporting people into space. so how can we say that Edward argument doesnt meet Theresa's point???
Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2009, 13:19
acer2knight wrote:
OA is D.

(D) It does not meet Teresa’s point because it assumes that there is no serious impediment to transporting people into space, but this was the issue raised by Teresa.

Theresa was talking about the cost incurred and she doesnt refer to anything to do with transporting people into space. so how can we say that Edward argument doesnt meet Theresa's point???

I went with D before seeing the OA.

"Manned spaceflight" would be the part of Theresa's statement that has to do with transporting people into space. If it's not economically feasible, then that would be a serious impediment.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 299
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2009, 17:18
i too went for D, E was tricky, but D is clearly better, one is talking about unmanned vs manned flights while edward is talking about reliability of manned flights vs other manned flights
Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2009
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 19:55
Edward disagrees with Theresa by giving an evidence of "reliability: two accidents in twenty-five years"

So I think "C" is the answer
Re: Theresa Vs Edward   [#permalink] 04 Aug 2009, 19:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it 9 30 Sep 2010, 04:22
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it 11 31 Mar 2009, 22:28
8 Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it 10 04 Oct 2008, 12:58
Since 1945 there have been numerous international 11 23 Oct 2007, 01:47
Teresa: Manned spaceflight does not have a future, since it 3 12 Jul 2007, 10:40
Display posts from previous: Sort by