Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 May 2013, 17:30
Customize  |  Hide

That educators have not anticipated the impact of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

SC 683 - use of It [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2009, 08:27
00:00

Question Stats:

100% (01:11) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
683. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.
(A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault
(B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault
(C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology
(D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology
(E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said


[Reveal] Spoiler:
D


I am not sure why C is not the correct answer... is it because that the 2nd "it" has no clear antecedent? Can someone clarifies this? Thanks.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Re: SC 683 - use of It [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2009, 10:02
The answer from the OA is D, but I don't see why C is a wrong choice..Besides the meaning is changed such that the noun clause " who have not anticipated..." is modifying "educators" instead of serving as a reason for why educators are at fault..
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Posts: 28
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: SC 683 - use of It [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2009, 10:19
richardkliao wrote:
The answer from the OA is D, but I don't see why C is a wrong choice..Besides the meaning is changed such that the noun clause " who have not anticipated..." is modifying "educators" instead of serving as a reason for why educators are at fault..



Hi,
What i think so second it doesn't have clear referent as you mentioned earlier.
because sentences start with "it" usually has "that" to refer.
Hope it makes some sense :)

Thanks
rajnish
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 20
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 5

Re: SC 683 - use of It [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2009, 10:46
Agree, the second it has no clear reference. Thanks@!
Re: SC 683 - use of It   [#permalink] 30 Nov 2009, 10:46
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have GMATPIPO 13 08 Jan 2005, 14:52
New posts That educators have not anticipated the impact of MoscowFuturist 6 17 Apr 2005, 03:21
Popular new posts That educators have not anticipated the impact of mbassmbass04 11 28 Apr 2005, 05:15
Popular new posts Impact craters caused by meteorites smashing into Earth have WinWinMBA 12 10 May 2005, 16:14
Popular new posts OG 50) That educators have not anticipated the impact of x2suresh 18 22 Jun 2008, 15:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

That educators have not anticipated the impact of

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.