Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 May 2013, 21:11
Customize  |  Hide

The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2012
Posts: 4
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 1

CAT Tests
The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position [#permalink] New post 23 Feb 2013, 10:54
00:00

Question Stats:

42% (01:45) correct 57% (00:58) wrong based on 0 sessions
The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting .
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

can u please shed more light on how d is wrong here.

thanks in advance,

keerthi
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1083
Followers: 512

Kudos [?]: 1064 [0], given: 131

Re: VERBING VS VERB [#permalink] New post 25 Feb 2013, 21:53
keerthisaran wrote:
The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting .
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

can u please shed more light on how d is wrong here.

thanks in advance,

keerthi


Hi Keerthi,

In choice C, the comma + verb-ing modifier "not reflecting" modifies the preceding clause. So either this modifier will present additional information about the how aspect of the verb or will present the result of the action in the preceding clause.

If it presents the how aspect of the verb in the preceding clause, then this modification does not make sense to say that the offer was meant by not reflecting a commitment.

If this modifier presents the result of the preceding clause then the sentence will mean that the offer was meant resulting into not reflecting the commitment. In both cases the modification is illogical.

Choice D on the other hand presents the characteristics of the offer in parallel structure - the verbs and makes complete sense.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________

Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions)
Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
ImageImageImageImage

Re: VERBING VS VERB   [#permalink] 25 Feb 2013, 21:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts The attorney turned down the law firms offer of a position gmatblast 5 04 Jul 2004, 12:46
New posts The attorney turned down the law firm s offer of a position christoph 3 16 Mar 2005, 11:10
New posts The attorney turned down the law firms offer of a position macca 4 16 Sep 2005, 08:17
Popular new posts The attorney turned down the law firms offer of a position gmacvik 12 07 Jan 2006, 09:24
Popular new posts The attorney turned down the law firms offer of a position tarek99 12 15 Mar 2008, 11:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The attorney turned down the law firm's offer of a position

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.