Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 31 Aug 2015, 16:30
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The author of a new art history book argues that students

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 175
Location: Streamwood IL
Schools: Kellogg(Evening),Booth (Evening)
WE 1: 5 Years
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 3

The author of a new art history book argues that students [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2010, 13:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:39) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
The author of a new art history book argues that students whose paintings come to be received as masterpieces achieve greatness by perfecting the technique and vision of their teachers. To support this theory, the author provides a detailed comparison of the works of 15 student-teacher pairs, in each case demonstrating that the teacher’s work is superseded by the student’s.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion reached by the author of the art history book?

The book does not include any side-by-side illustrations comparing the work of students to the work of their teachers.

The author does not consider the fact that, in student-teacher pairs, both artists can produce either masterpieces or low-quality works.

The author does not give sufficient attention to the historical context of each masterpiece produced.

The author chose for inclusion only those artists whom he considered to have surpassed their teachers, and then examined the relationship of their respective paintings.

The author concentrates almost exclusively on the techniques developed by the teachers, and does not give sufficient attention to the execution of technique by the students.
_________________

Rock On

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Its Wow or Never
Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Posts: 208
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V40
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 7

Re: Explain please [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2010, 13:14
atish wrote:
The author of a new art history book argues that students whose paintings come to be received as masterpieces achieve greatness by perfecting the technique and vision of their teachers. To support this theory, the author provides a detailed comparison of the works of 15 student-teacher pairs, in each case demonstrating that the teacher’s work is superseded by the student’s.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion reached by the author of the art history book?

The book does not include any side-by-side illustrations comparing the work of students to the work of their teachers.

The author does not consider the fact that, in student-teacher pairs, both artists can produce either masterpieces or low-quality works.

The author does not give sufficient attention to the historical context of each masterpiece produced.

The author chose for inclusion only those artists whom he considered to have surpassed their teachers, and then examined the relationship of their respective paintings.

The author concentrates almost exclusively on the techniques developed by the teachers, and does not give sufficient attention to the execution of technique by the students.



D acc to me...OA plz!!
P.S. Lots of similar questions in the OG
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you think you can,you can
If you think you can't,you are right.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 175
Location: Streamwood IL
Schools: Kellogg(Evening),Booth (Evening)
WE 1: 5 Years
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 3

Re: Explain please [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2010, 21:46
OA is D.
I got this wrong because I confused superseded with surpassed. So D actually strengthened the arguments. The devil is in the details.
_________________

Rock On

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Explain please [#permalink] New post 03 Jan 2010, 00:29
D is correct .. thanks
Re: Explain please   [#permalink] 03 Jan 2010, 00:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Reviewer: The book Art's Decline argues that European manimgoindowndown 1 08 Mar 2013, 11:13
5 Publisher Big Books proposal to encourage new authors by sushma0805 7 06 Apr 2010, 14:37
The author of a book tracing the relationship of kyatin 6 24 Apr 2008, 21:31
From a book review: The authors blithely claim that there dwivedys 7 18 Nov 2006, 00:10
Most students are bored by history courses as they are ronybtl 7 08 Nov 2005, 06:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The author of a new art history book argues that students

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.