Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2011, 13:30

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:38) correct
58% (01:40) wrong based on 33 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price?

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2011, 15:32

IMO - B.

Original cost before weight adjustment: X Cost after 90% weight adjustment: 9/10X 20% profit on 9/10X: (120/100)(9/10)(X) or 108X/100 Mark up on original cost of X: (108X/100)/X-1 = 8/100

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

04 Oct 2011, 10:17

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

upasanadatta wrote:

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price? a)40% b)8% c)25% d)16.66% e)9%

The most natural way to deal with 'weights' questions is by assuming values.

Say the trader's balance shows 100 gms. It is actually 90 gms because it weighs 10% less. Say, the cost price is $90 ($1/gm). Since he gets a profit of 20%, the selling price must be 90+(20/100)*90 = $108

Since the cost price is actually supposed to be $100 (for 100 gms) and the selling price is $108, the mark up is simply 8%. _________________

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2011, 01:32

I am bit confused here.

Question reads “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should.” I guess this means the balance of the trader weighs 90gms when the actual weight is 100gms.

Assuming original cost price = c and marked up selling price =s 90 x s = 100 x (120% x c) ---- Here LHS is the cash made by selling 90gm at selling price ---- Here RHS is what the seller actually intends i.e. selling the 100gm at 120% of original cost price.

90s =120c s/c =12/9 s=1.33c

Hence the original price has to be jacked up by 33.33 % to get the intended profit.

P.S - I am solving purely looking at the question. The underlined portion substantiates my doubt. The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2011, 02:55

Expert's post

MrGolfer wrote:

I am bit confused here.

Question reads “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should.” I guess this means the balance of the trader weighs 90gms when the actual weight is 100gms.

'Balance weighs 10% less than it should'

What this actually means is that if the balance shows 100 gms, it should weigh 100 gms of produce. But it weighs only 90 gms of produce (10% less). So you pay for 100 gms but you get to buy only 90 gms. _________________

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2011, 03:42

I would differ here. Question reads “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should.” which implies “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should [weigh].” i.e. 90gm when it should weigh 100gm. And taking it further "Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price?"

I guess a lot us are working backwards to fit in the answer choice. I guess knowing the source of the question will be great help.

@upasanadatta - Please advise the source of the question.

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2011, 05:25

MrGolfer wrote:

I would differ here. Question reads “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should.” which implies “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should [weigh].” i.e. 90gm when it should weigh 100gm. And taking it further "Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price?"

I guess a lot us are working backwards to fit in the answer choice. I guess knowing the source of the question will be great help.

@upasanadatta - Please advise the source of the question.

I agree with MrGolfer here. I think the profit should be on 100 and not 90. Even I got 33.33%. Source and OE (if possible) please. _________________

Ifmypostdida dancein your mind, send methe stepsthrough kudos :)

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2011, 06:29

upasanadatta wrote:

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price? a)40% b)8% c)25% d)16.66% e)9%

Bad wording. I think the markup is 20% as mentioned in the stem. OR, the question should say; What is the mark up on the SUPPOSED cost price as Karishma mentioned.

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2011, 03:20

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

fluke wrote:

upasanadatta wrote:

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price? a)40% b)8% c)25% d)16.66% e)9%

Bad wording. I think the markup is 20% as mentioned in the stem. OR, the question should say; What is the mark up on the SUPPOSED cost price as Karishma mentioned.

Either way; bad question.

I guess if many people are troubled by the wording, it must be one of those questions where the wording implies different things depending on your background. I wouldn't worry about such a question.

That said, defective balance/weight questions are often worded in one of these ways: 1. The 1 kg weight weighs 10% less. (Here the weight is the metal piece which is supposed to weigh a kg and is put on one pan of the beam balance. So the product you want to buy is in the other pan and you will get only 900 gms though you will pay for 1 kg) 2. The balance weighs 10% less than it should. I think of a spring balance here. It displays 1 kg but weighs only 900 gms of the product. 3. The balance reads 10% more than what it weighs. Here, if the product is 100 gms, the balance reads 110 gms and you pay for 110 gms.

Also, marked price is always on what is visible to all. The defect in the balance is an anomaly and leads to extra profit for the trader. Otherwise, when he marks up, he does that on what the balance reads.

But as I said, if you have learned it differently, don't worry. In GMAT, it will be very clear what the intended meaning is. _________________

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Oct 2011, 08:19

VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

fluke wrote:

upasanadatta wrote:

The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price? a)40% b)8% c)25% d)16.66% e)9%

Bad wording. I think the markup is 20% as mentioned in the stem. OR, the question should say; What is the mark up on the SUPPOSED cost price as Karishma mentioned.

Either way; bad question.

I guess if many people are troubled by the wording, it must be one of those questions where the wording implies different things depending on your background. I wouldn't worry about such a question.

That said, defective balance/weight questions are often worded in one of these ways: 1. The 1 kg weight weighs 10% less. (Here the weight is the metal piece which is supposed to weigh a kg and is put on one pan of the beam balance. So the product you want to buy is in the other pan and you will get only 900 gms though you will pay for 1 kg) 2. The balance weighs 10% less than it should. I think of a spring balance here. It displays 1 kg but weighs only 900 gms of the product. 3. The balance reads 10% more than what it weighs. Here, if the product is 100 gms, the balance reads 110 gms and you pay for 110 gms.

Also, marked price is always on what is visible to all. The defect in the balance is an anomaly and leads to extra profit for the trader. Otherwise, when he marks up, he does that on what the balance reads.

But as I said, if you have learned it differently, don't worry. In GMAT, it will be very clear what the intended meaning is.

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Oct 2011, 01:42

MrGolfer wrote:

I would differ here. Question reads “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should.” which implies “The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should [weigh].” i.e. 90gm when it should weigh 100gm. And taking it further "Still the trader marks up his goods to get an overall profit of 20%. What is the mark up on the cost price?"

I guess a lot us are working backwards to fit in the answer choice. I guess knowing the source of the question will be great help.

@upasanadatta - Please advise the source of the question.

@bb: you see, this is precisely why i didnt mark the official answer....ppl have a tendency to 'backsolve' when the answer is known.. @MrGolfer: My thought process more or less followed the same path as yours....but i agree with Karishma's explanation...and also the fact that the wording is not clear in the question.....the OE is same as Karishma's but but not half as clear. The source is a book meant for MBA entrance exams here in India and not really a GMAT practice material...its name is Quantum CAT by Sarvesh Verma ....bad english but an excellent book otherwise....

Re: The balance of a trader weighs 10% less than it should. Still the [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Oct 2015, 13:57

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________

So, my final tally is in. I applied to three b schools in total this season: INSEAD – admitted MIT Sloan – admitted Wharton – waitlisted and dinged No...

A few weeks ago, the following tweet popped up in my timeline. thanks @Uber_Mumbai for showing me what #daylightrobbery means!I know I have a choice not to use it...

“This elective will be most relevant to learn innovative methodologies in digital marketing in a place which is the origin for major marketing companies.” This was the crux...