The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 20 Jan 2017, 15:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 126
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 15

The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 12:26
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

82% (02:10) correct 18% (01:37) wrong based on 81 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later. Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

If you have any questions
New!
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 785

Kudos [?]: 6528 [0], given: 1012

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 14:36
Sometimes I worder if you have a strategy to attck the question and nont only saying: need explanation of the answer choices.

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

The company worked better before a certain date than after

Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Conclusion: the products before 1990 was better in quality that after 1990

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

The level of resources dedicated by the company to the other manufactures is irrelevant

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

The items built after 1990 is irrelevant. Moreover, we care about quality not the size per se

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

The materials (so the quality of the process to manufact the items) are the same and not better before or after 1990. Correct

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

The average time is irrelevant

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

Completely out od scope

_________________
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 854
Followers: 87

Kudos [?]: 242 [1] , given: 61

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 19:37
1
KUDOS
@CARCASS i disagree with u . i think C is in fact a supporter and i feel that answer of this sud be B

evidence is :The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

conclusion :Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

C is basically giving us reason to believe more into the conclusion that artisans before 1990 were more skilled than artisans after 1990

B ,however , is doing that weakening for it is giving us an alternate reasoning as why sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.and hence a weakener !!!
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 126
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 15

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 01:02
@CARCASS i disagree with u . i think C is in fact a supporter and i feel that answer of this sud be B

evidence is :The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

conclusion :Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

C is basically giving us reason to believe more into the conclusion that artisans before 1990 were more skilled than artisans after 1990

B ,however , is doing that weakening for it is giving us an alternate reasoning as why sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.and hence a weakener !!!

@Aditya...B indeed is the official answer I was caught up between B and D only to realize that D actually strengthen the argument ...Thanks!! for your insight
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 30
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 24

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 03:20
carcass wrote:
Sometimes I worder if you have a strategy to attck the question and nont only saying: need explanation of the answer choices.

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

The company worked better before a certain date than after

Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Conclusion: the products before 1990 was better in quality that after 1990

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

The level of resources dedicated by the company to the other manufactures is irrelevant

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

The items built after 1990 is irrelevant. Moreover, we care about quality not the size per se

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

The materials (so the quality of the process to manufact the items) are the same and not better before or after 1990. Correct

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

The average time is irrelevant

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

Completely out od scope

How does C weaken the conclusion? If the .materials were the same, it supports the conclusion that they were more attentive.

I know that B is about the size, but since we dont have an obvious weaken answer choice, can we not consider it as a possible answer? ..more the no. Of people, more the wear and tear..

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 81
Schools: IIM
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 11

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 05:32
I think B should be the answer.

B tells us that Sailboats made after 1990 spend more time at sea and hence more wear and tear happens so these sailboats do not able to retain the original finish, polish, etc. And therefore attention of manufacturers does not matter. And, so, B weaken the argument.

Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 126
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 15

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 07:03
ranjeet75 wrote:
I think B should be the answer.

B tells us that Sailboats made after 1990 spend more time at sea and hence more wear and tear happens so these sailboats do not able to retain the original finish, polish, etc. And therefore attention of manufacturers does not matter. And, so, B weaken the argument.

Yes ..IMO any option that provides an alternate reason other than " sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently" for increased likeliness of boats manufactured before 1990 to retain its original paint and finish should weaken the conclusion...B rightly does that
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 126
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 15

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 07:13
kapsycumm wrote:
carcass wrote:
Sometimes I worder if you have a strategy to attck the question and nont only saying: need explanation of the answer choices.

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

The company worked better before a certain date than after

Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Conclusion: the products before 1990 was better in quality that after 1990

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

The level of resources dedicated by the company to the other manufactures is irrelevant

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

The items built after 1990 is irrelevant. Moreover, we care about quality not the size per se

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

The materials (so the quality of the process to manufact the items) are the same and not better before or after 1990. Correct

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

The average time is irrelevant

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

Completely out od scope

How does C weaken the conclusion? If the .materials were the same, it supports the conclusion that they were more attentive.

I know that B is about the size, but since we dont have an obvious weaken answer choice, can we not consider it as a possible answer? ..more the no. Of people, more the wear and tear..

Posted from my mobile device

@kapsycumm.. No C doesn't weaken the conclusion or else it would have been a contender for the right answer (Its a weaken the argument question)...it in fact strengthens the conclusion by dismissing an alternate cause that might have caused the difference in quality
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3089
Followers: 785

Kudos [?]: 6528 [0], given: 1012

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 08:12
Well it seems that someone stay s on the front line to highlight a wrong (maybe) response such as a international complotto or conspiracy . It's a simple question on which we can agree or disagree, though, maintaining an attitude composed.

Secondly, a boat could be large and accomodate even if it doesn't have the best quality materials; in the conclusion we are talking of a superior quality of producing a sailboat

Quote:
C is basically giving us reason to believe more into the conclusion that artisans before 1990 were more skilled than artisans after 1990

maybe or not. you can infer this but you do not know exactly if a boat is produced in its entirely in a factory without high skill workers.

it is some time that I have stopped to do mgmat question and I dedicated myself only to official materials.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 30
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 24

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2013, 09:38
ratinarace wrote:
kapsycumm wrote:
carcass wrote:
Sometimes I worder if you have a strategy to attck the question and nont only saying: need explanation of the answer choices.

The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later.

The company worked better before a certain date than after

Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Conclusion: the products before 1990 was better in quality that after 1990

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

The level of resources dedicated by the company to the other manufactures is irrelevant

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

The items built after 1990 is irrelevant. Moreover, we care about quality not the size per se

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

The materials (so the quality of the process to manufact the items) are the same and not better before or after 1990. Correct

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

The average time is irrelevant

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

Completely out od scope

How does C weaken the conclusion? If the .materials were the same, it supports the conclusion that they were more attentive.

I know that B is about the size, but since we dont have an obvious weaken answer choice, can we not consider it as a possible answer? ..more the no. Of people, more the wear and tear..

Posted from my mobile device

@kapsycumm.. No C doesn't weaken the conclusion or else it would have been a contender for the right answer (Its a weaken the argument question)...it in fact strengthens the conclusion by dismissing an alternate cause that might have caused the difference in quality

Sorry, I meant to say "strenghten"..but, you get the point

Carcass..I apologize if my post was too strong. I was replying from my phone.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 288
Location: India
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 137 [0], given: 75

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2013, 21:38
The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later. Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently. [CONCLUSION]

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.
ofs.

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.
Not because of quality difference (as stated in the conclusion) but may be because of usage pattern (more time at sea, more people per use) , sailboat may not retain the original finish..etc..
C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.
NOTE: The word "significantly" . This means May be sailboat manufacturers were using slightly different material. And may be just this slight difference improves the quality

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.
Generic statement. OFS : "average time". [/color]

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.
OFS: Replacement or re-sale
_________________

YOU CAN, IF YOU THINK YOU CAN

Manager
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 80
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1

Re: The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc." [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2013, 23:45
ratinarace wrote:
The brochure for “Sailboat Sellers Inc.” indicates that sailboats manufactured before 1990 are more likely to have retained their original finish, polish, and detailing than those manufactured in 1990 or later. Therefore, sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher-quality, durable sailboats before 1990 than was the case subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, would serve to cast doubt on this conclusion?

A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats is generally much higher than that for most other manufactured goods.

B) Sailboats built after 1990 are generally larger, spend more time at sea, and accommodate more people per use than those built before 1990.

C) The materials used by sailboat manufacturers before 1990 were not significantly different from those used after 1990.

D) The average time to manufacture a sailboat has declined significantly since 1990.

E) Re-finishing, polishing, and detailing a sailboat is very costly, leading many owners to trade in their sailboats for a replacement or buy a new one as opposed to repairing the original.

i will analyse the arguement first before going to the evaluation..the finding of the brochure is that sailboats manufactured before 1990 were of high qaulity and more durable than those manufacture after 1990..the arguement further makes a conclusion that before-1990 sailboats were particularly better than the after-1990 sailboats ..the only way we can cast doubt on this conclusion is to show that nothing has necessarily changed in the making of the boats from before 1990 and after and hence the sailboats must be of the same qaulitx value..only C is favourable for an option..c directly states that the same material that was used to build the high quality and durable sailboats before 1990 is the one that has remained for use until after 1990
VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 37

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 70

Re: The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Mar 2013, 03:44
Its easy if we keep it simple....
Conclusion: Sailboat manufactured prior to 1990 were stronger ones than the newer ones...

So B must be the answer.
Archit
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 276
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Other
GPA: 2.44
WE: Project Management (Telecommunications)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 734 [0], given: 325

Re: The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2013, 21:50
Archit143 wrote:
Its easy if we keep it simple....
Conclusion: Sailboat manufactured prior to 1990 were stronger ones than the newer ones...

So B must be the answer.
Archit

Here's the OE-

The conclusion of the argument is that sailboat manufacturers were more attentive to producing higher quality, durable sailboats before 1990. This conclusion is based on the fact that sailboats manufactured before 1990 were more likely to retain their original finish, polish, and detailing. In order to weaken this conclusion, we should look for a reason, aside from shoddy manufacturing, that would lead sailboats built after 1990 to lose their finish at a higher rate than those built before 1990. Alternatively, the correct answer could provide another reason, aside from high-quality manufacturing, that sailboats built before 1990 retain their original finish at a higher rate.

(A) The level of resources dedicated to the manufacturing process of sailboats relative to other manufactured goods is not relevant to the argument or the conclusion.

(B) CORRECT. This answer choice provides a reason that sailboats built after 1990 may wear out more quickly than those built before 1990. If the newer sailboats are larger, accommodate more people, and spend more time at sea, it may be that they experience more wear and tear than sailboats that are smaller, have fewer passengers, and spend more time docked. Thus, the difference may lie in the use of the sailboats, and not their manufacturing.

(C) The fact that the materials used by sailboat manufacturers were constant does not affect the conclusion, as it is possible to be more attentive to producing higher quality sailboats while using substantially the same materials. For example, a manufacturer could use more of the same material in order to improve the construction.

(D) A decrease in manufacturing time could potentially serve to strengthen the conclusion, not weaken it, though the decrease could be a result of technological advances as much as a decline in manufacturing standards.

(E) The relative costs of re-finishing a sailboat as opposed to buying a new one or replacing it are not relevant to the conclusion.
Re: The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that   [#permalink] 21 Oct 2013, 21:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 All-included tour package brochure: 10 28 Jun 2015, 02:56
8 Brochure of an opposition political organization: 10 09 Aug 2013, 21:30
1 Adam won this year s local sailboat race by beating Lenin , 5 16 Nov 2012, 06:30
2 Seller s commercial: Aviator Magazine reported that our 5 23 Feb 2011, 10:44
3 Maria won this year s local sailboat race by beating Sue, 8 06 Jul 2007, 02:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by